WATER SUPPLY PLANNING
COMMITTEE
ITEM: |
DISCUSSION
ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
7. |
UPDATE ON CARMEL RIVER BASIN
(CARMEL VALLEY ALLUVIAL AQUIFER) SGMA PROCESS |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
April 5, 2016 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: N/A |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: On
February 29th, the General Manager sent an inquiry jointly to
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) staff, describing
an inherent conflict in how DWR and SWRCB view the Carmel River Alluvial
Aquifer and how it will be affected by the Sustainable Groundwater Management
Act (SGMA). We had mentioned it briefly to DWR staff on a few occasions,
but at this time summarized the issue in a single page, attached as Exhibit 7-A.
The Water Management District’s conclusion is that what DWR refers to as
the Carmel Valley Groundwater Basin in Bulletin 118 has been determined to be
surface water by the SWRCB. This led to several questions:
·
Should
the Carmel River aquifer be exempt from SGMA?
·
What is
the best way to exempt it – by letter from DWR or by removal from Bulletin 118?
·
If by
removal from Bulletin 118, should it be done through the DWR Basin Boundary
Modification Request System by formal request by March 31st, or some
other method?
·
Would a
meeting between DWR, SWRCB, and the District (the GSA) be necessary to discuss
this matter?
On March 16, 2016 DWR staff stated “I don't think Monterey would have to
take any action. Although I doubt we will deal with this through a basin
adjustment, DWR would have the ability to make any adjustments without having
Monterey submit since this is a special technical issue.” We also learned that there was one other
basin in the State with a similar issue, and 4-5 others with similar problems
for a portion of the basin.
We also informed DWR that their Bulletin 118 boundary for the Carmel
River Basin were outdated and inconsistent with current knowledge. DWR indicated that it is currently updating
the Department defined modifications to basin boundaries (Administrative
Adjustments) and will include the District’s changes as part of that set. On March 29th, the District
forwarded GIS shapefiles and SWRCB Order 95-10 describing the geologic setting
as surface water flowing in a known and definite channel underground.
We have been told to expect a letter or notification from DWR that the
Carmel River Basin is exempt from SGMA and will not require a Groundwater
Sustainability Plan.
EXHIBIT
7-A Summary of The Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer issues with SGMA
U:\staff\Board_Committees\WSP\2016\20160405\07\Item-7.docx
U:\dstoldt\Board Subcommittee Items and Exhibits\2016\WSP 4-5\Item 7.docx