ITEM: |
CONSENT
CALENDAR |
||||
|
|||||
3. |
AUTHORIZE EXPENDITURE OF
BUDGETED FUNDS FOR WATER YEAR 2005 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
November 15, 2004 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David A.
Berger, |
Program/ |
1.2 Water Supply |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: 1-2-1 A. 1. |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
|
Cost Estimate: |
$74,950 |
||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee reviewed this item at its November 3, 2004 meeting and recommended approval. |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: The Board will consider whether or not to
amend an existing contract with Padre Associates, Inc. to assist staff with
implementation of the planned Water Year (WY) 2005 Seaside Basin ground water
injection testing program (also know as aquifer storage and recovery, or
ASR). Specifically, this authorization
will allow for a continuation of the injection testing at the District’s Santa
Margarita Test Injection Well (SMTIW), located on former
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the General Manager to amend the Padre contract for assistance in conducting WY 2005 ASR testing in an amount not-to-exceed $74,952. This includes a “baseline” amount of $68,138 as described in Exhibit 3-A and a $6,814 (10%) contingency that would only be used if authorized in writing by the MPWMD General Manager, based on written justification. In addition, it is recommended that the Board direct staff to solicit participation from Cal-Am to participate in completion of some or all of the optional tasks described in Exhibit 3-A. At its November 3, 2004 meeting, the Administrative Committee voted 2 to 0 recommend approval.
BACKGROUND: The SMTIW was installed in 2001 and
improvements to the Cal-Am system to deliver injection water to the well were
completed in 2002. The amount of water
injected during testing through WY 2004 totaled 505 acre-feet (AF) at this
facility. In August 2003, the California
Department of Health Services (CDHS) first issued approval to recover the
injected water back into the Cal-Am distribution system for delivery to users
on the
In addition, previous testing has found that the recovered water has been a blend of the Carmel River system injectate and native ground water, and that the recovered water retained some chemical imprints of the Carmel River system water even after 100% of each seasons’s injected volume was removed. This suggests that injection in the Seaside Basin is capable of “conditioning” the aquifer even after a greater volume is removed than was injected, and that injection reduces the occurrence of hydrogen sulfide present in the native ground water, which is an ancillary benefit of the ASR program. All water quality results from the WY 2004 recovery testing have not yet been received and reviewed. Once received, they will be included in the summary report of the WY 2004 ASR testing results, which should be available for Board review in January 2005.
3-A October 26, 2004 Proposal for Hydrogeologic and Engineering Services, Santa Margarita Test Injection Well, Water Year 2005 Program
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2004\2004boardpacket20041115\ConsentClndr\03\item3.doc
J.
Oliver, 10/26/04, 3 pages