EXHIBIT
11-B
DRAFT
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT (MPWMD)
FINDINGS of APPROVAL
CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION TO AMEND CAL-AM WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM TO ANNEX SHOWE PARCEL; APN 197-081-025
Adopted by MPWMD Board on May __, 2005
Unless otherwise noted, all evidence is on file and available for public review at the District office, 5 Harris Court, Bldg. G, Monterey (Ryan Ranch)
It
is hereby found and determined as follows:
1. FINDING: Applicant California American Water (Cal-Am) is the owner
of the Cal-Am water distribution system (WDS), a regulated public utility. Co-applicant Lombardo & Gilles is
attorney for Mr. Jon Showe, owner of property located at 32835 Carmel Valley
Road, Carmel Valley. The Showe parcel
(APN 197-081-025) is 10.0 acres in size and currently includes a single-family
residence, guest quarters, tennis court, handball court, pool, miscellaneous
outbuildings and irrigated landscaping.
The parcel is not within the Cal-Am service area, but since
approximately 1947 has received Cal-Am water via an active water meter and
connection. An active, registered non-potable well exists on the property and
is used to irrigate vegetation on the parcel.
EVIDENCE: Application #20050209SHO received February 9, 2005, site map and supporting application materials and correspondence. Aerial photographs with GIS layer of parcel boundaries. Database of Monterey County Assessors parcels and ownership. MPWMD well reporting records.
2.
FINDING: Construction and remodeling projects
on the home occurred prior to 1978, the year MPWMD was created. Uses on the property appear to comply with
applicable Monterey County land use regulations. No additional construction
requiring an MPWMD permit via a Monterey County use permit is recorded after
1978.
EVIDENCE: Monterey County building inspection records contained in
application materials. MPWMD water
connection permit records and database.
3. FINDING: Applicants have applied for a permit
to amend the Cal-Am WDS boundary to annex parcel APN 197-081-025 to ensure
consistency between the Cal-Am service area boundary and parcels actually
served. Cal-Am water service has been in place since approximately 1947.
EVIDENCE: Application #20050209SHO and supporting materials.
4. FINDING: Monterey County Health Department well construction
permit #W-1370 was issued January 13, 1978 for the non-potable well on parcel
APN 197-081-025. The well was first
registered with MPWMD in 1981. Annual
reporting has been spotty in recent years, requiring MPMWD staff to make water
production estimates. An updated Well
Registration Form is required to ensure compliance with MPWMD well regulations.
EVIDENCE: Monterey
County Health Department permit #W-1370; State DWR Well Completion Report
#______; MPWMD well reporting database and supporting files; e-mail memorandum
dated May 3, 2005 from Tom Lindberg, MPWMD Associate Hydrologist.
5. FINDING: The application to amend the Cal-Am WDS, along with supporting materials, is in accordance with District Rules 21 and 22.
EVIDENCE: Application #20050209SHO received February 9, 2005, site map and supporting application materials and correspondence.
Required Findings (MPWMD Rule 22-B)
6. FINDING: The approval of the permit would not result duplication
of water service as the subject property has been served by Cal-Am since
approximately 1947. Approval of the
permit, with the specified conditions, would result in a service area boundary
that is consistent with the actual properties served by Cal-Am.
EVIDENCE: Map of Cal-Am service area with
identified parcel locations submitted by applicant. MPWMD Conditions of Approval for Permit
#M05-03, Condition #9.
7. FINDING: The approval of the permit would not result in water
importation or exportation to or from the District, respectively.
EVIDENCE: The referenced parcel is located wholly
within the MPWMD as shown on District boundary location maps on file at the
District office.
8. FINDING: Approval of the application would not result in
significant adverse impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated by
conditions attached to the permit. The
Carmel River flows year-round in the reach nearest the subject parcel and has
high quality fish habitat. Nearby Cal-Am
wells (Russell Well Nos. 2 and 4) serve the parcel following treatment at
Cal-Am’s Carmel Valley Filter Plant. No
measurable effect on the environment would occur as the parcel already has a
multi-decade history of Cal-Am use. No
increase to the Cal-Am production limit occurs as a result of approval of the
application. Approval enables
consistency between the Cal-Am service area boundary and actual properties
served, and facilitates more accurate water use tracking and management for the
benefit of the environment.
EVIDENCE: MPWMD streamflow records for Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer (CVAA) Subunit 1; MPWMD fish habitat quality assessments; Cal-Am hydraulic map of service area as well as quarterly Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) governing water production. Application materials describing Cal-Am water service since 1947. MPWMD well reporting records. CEQA Notice of Exemption signed May __, 2005 citing CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order 95-10 limiting Carmel River diversions. MPWMD Permit #M05-03, Condition #3, which does not increase existing Cal-Am water production limit, and Condition #8, which requires water conservation to reduce water use.
9. FINDING: The application adequately identifies the claim of right
for the source of water supply and provides supporting verification. The SWRCB
has identified 3,376 AFY as the recognized Cal-Am right to divert water from
the Carmel River, and identifies in-basin consumers as having a high priority.
EVIDENCE: Cal-Am water rights and state policies
are described in detail in SWRCB Order WR 95-10 and Decision #1632, both issued
in July 1995.
10. FINDING: The
application demonstrates existence of a long-term reliable source of water
supply for the proposed uses. Cal-Am is
certified by the State Department of Health Services to deliver water to more
than 39,000 customers. See Finding #9
above for Cal-Am recognized water rights for in-basin users within Carmel River
Basin.
EVIDENCE: Cal-Am water service and water quality
records and evaluations on file at the State Department of Health Services,
Monterey office. SWRCB Order WR 95-10
and Decision #1632, both issued in July 1995.
11. FINDING: The
source of Cal-Am supply for the subject parcel has been the Carmel River or the
CVAA Subunit 1 since approximately 1947.
Though other CVAA subunits farther downstream are impacted by Cal-Am and
other water distribution systems, CVAA Subunit 1 is known to have high-quality
fish habitat and year-round water flow.
Thus, the cumulative effects of issuance of a permit to continue to
serve the subject parcel would not be expected to result in significant adverse
impacts to the species and habitat dependent on those sources of supply.
EVIDENCE: MPWMD streamflow records for Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer (CVAA) Subunit 1; MPWMD fish habitat quality assessments; Cal-Am hydraulic map of service area as well as quarterly Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) governing water production. Application materials describing Cal-Am water service since 1947. MPWMD well reporting records. CEQA Notice of Exemption signed May __, 2005 citing CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order 95-10 limiting Carmel River diversions. MPWMD Permit #M05-03, Condition #3, which does not increase existing Cal-Am water production limit, and Condition #8, which requires water conservation to reduce water use.
12. FINDING: The
source of Cal-Am supply for the subject parcel is derived from the Monterey
Peninsula Water Resources System. The
subject parcel does not overlie the CVAA, but water delivered by Cal-Am is
derived from the CVAA. A non-potable
well draws water from non-alluvial upland sources to irrigate vegetation on the
property.
EVIDENCE: MPWMD map showing boundaries of Carmel Valley Alluvial
Aquifer; MPWMD well records for parcel APN 197-081-025.
13. FINDING: Approval
of the application would bring the property into the Cal-Am service area,
including use of Cal-Am water for emergency fire protection. Temporary water
service could be provided by trucked-in water pursuant to MPWMD Rule 173 if the
Cal-Am system experienced a failure or other non-fire emergency situation. An existing onsite non-potable well could
continue to meet outdoor irrigation water needs. No permanent intertie between
the Cal-Am WDS and any other system is allowed.
EVIDENCE: Map of Cal-Am service area; MPWMD well
reporting records. MPWMD Permit #M05-03
Conditions of Approval, Condition #12.
14. FINDING: A
back-flow protection device to prevent contamination of the Cal-Am system will
be installed as a condition of this permit due to the existence of an active
non-potable well on the parcel.
EVIDENCE: MPWMD Permit #M05-03 Conditions of
Approval, Condition #13.
Minimum Standards for Granting a Permit
(MPWMD Rule 22-C)
15. FINDING: The application adequately identifies the responsible party (system owner and operator) as California American Water.
EVIDENCE: Permit application #20050209SHO.
16. FINDING: The
application meets the definition of a “multiple-parcel connection system” and
therefore must comply with California Title 22 water quality standards. Cal-Am water meets Title 22 standards.
EVIDENCE: Permit application #20050209SHO; State
Department of Health Services records on file at its Monterey office.
17. FINDING: The
location of the source of supply for the water distribution system is
known. The Cal-Am water source for
customers in the area of the subject parcel is the CVAA, Subunit 1, drawn from
nearby wells.
EVIDENCE: Description of Cal-Am system available
at Cal-Am office. Quarterly MOA/water
supply strategy and budget describing best management practices for sources of
Cal-Am supply.
18. FINDING: The
Carmel River has been determined to be “fully appropriated” from May 1 through
December 31 from a water rights perspective, and environmental effects to
federally listed species exist. However,
the CVAA is not in a hydrologic state of overdraft, particularly in the area of
the subject parcel (CVAA Subunit 1), where year-round flow of the Carmel River
occurs every year. Thus, approval of
the application would not create an overdraft or increase an existing overdraft
of a groundwater basin. Also, conditions
of approval do not increase allowed Cal-Am production to serve the subject
parcel. See also Findings 11 and 12.
EVIDENCE: See citations in Findings 11 and 12. MPWMD Permit #M05-03, Condition #3. SWRCB Order 98-08, November 19, 1998.
19. FINDING: The
approval of the application would not adversely affect the ability of existing
systems to provide water to users due to conditions of approval that do not
allow increased production to serve the subject parcel.
EVIDENCE: MPWMD Permit #M05-03, Condition #3.
Compliance with CEQA
20. FINDING: In
the review of this application, MPWMD has followed those guidelines adopted by
the State of California and published in the California Administrative Code,
Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. The
MPWMD, as a lead agency under CEQA for this action, determined that this action
is Categorically Exempt under Category 1, Existing Facilities. The subject residence has received Cal-Am
water since approximately 1947 and is a properly approved structure with
appropriate permits from Monterey County.
EVIDENCE: CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, Section
15301. Notice of Exemption for
Application to Amend Cal-Am WDS dated May __ , 2005.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2005\2005boardpackets\20050516\PubHrgs\11\item11_exh11b.doc