EXHIBIT 2-Cinteroffice memorandum

to:                 Rick Dickhaut

from:           stephanie pintar

subject:     rebate program proposal/history

date:            may 13, 2005

cc:                  david berger

SUMMARY

At the May 3, 2005 Board budget workshop, the Board asked for additional information about the District’s rebate program.  Specifically, the Board targeted two budget items that were identified as reductions in the Water Demand Division.  Staff’s proposal was to reduce the rebate account by $25,000, of which 50 percent is reimbursable by Cal-Am, and to eliminate a proposed rebate advertising budget of $25,000.  The advertising budget was marked as 100 percent reimbursable by Cal-Am:  Other project expenses were added that used the reimbursable funds available and re-implementing the rebate advertising fund at this time would require full District funding.  It should be noted that according to Cal-Am, there will be an advertising program this summer that will promote water conservation and the rebate program.  District staff will have input in the advertising approach.

history

The District’s rebate program began in December 1997 with rebates for the voluntary installation of ULF toilets.  That program was expanded in December 2003 to include rebates for dual-flush toilets, ultra-low consumption dishwashers and washing machines, on-demand hot water systems and cisterns.  Since 1997, the rebate program has rebated $667,642 and has resulted in the voluntary replacement of 6,851 toilets, 25 dishwashers, 43 washing machines, 2 hot water systems and one cistern. 

Advertising of the program has been limited since its inception and is likely the reason for declining participation in recent years.  During the first year of the program, the District funded newspaper ads featuring “Mr. Head” (right) in addition to providing some degree of public outreach to promote the program.  Since 1998, there has been no advertising of the program, other than word-of-mouth and retailer promotion.  The following chart shows the amount of rebates issued between 1997 and 2005.  Fifty percent of the toilet rebate is reimbursed by Cal-Am.

 

 

THE FUTURE

Water Demand Division staff are hoping to propose a further expansion of the rebate program during the second half of FY 2005-2006.  The following items, among others, would be considered in the rebate expansion plan.  Water savings associated with all possible rebate items are discussed on the attached “Summary of Potential Water Savings for New Water Efficient Products.”

·         High Efficiency commercial clothes washers;

·         Evapotranspiration driven irrigation controllers;

·         Water softener replacements (possibly as a joint project with local wastewater agencies);

·         Waterbrooms;

·         Flow control valves in commercial settings;

·         Cooling tower retrofits;

·         Pre-rinse spray valve replacements;

·         Irrigation system hardware upgrades;

·         X-ray machine upgrades.

The proposed FY 2005-2006 program budget for Water Conservation includes $125,000.  Rebates are approved as long as funding is available.  In the event that current funding is expended, applications will be held on a waiting list pending future funding.  Without promotion of the program, it is unlikely that the full amount of funding budgeted for FY 2005-06 will be expended, even with an expansion of the program at mid-year.  As a proposed expansion of the rebate program is not anticipated prior to mid-FY 2005-2006, a mid-year budget adjustment could be contemplated if additional conservation funds are available from Cal-Am.


Summary of Potential Water Savings for New Water Efficient Products*

 

Product

Water Savings Potential

Other Known Benefits

Source of Performance Test/Study(s)

ET Controllers

Up to 59% landscape irrigation savings

63 to 71% irrigation run-off reduction (significant environmental benefit)

Santa Barbara County ET Controller Program Report & Irvine Ranch Water Dist. ET Controller Study

Waterbrooms

63% water savings in cleaning operations on hard surfaces, when required by law

Up to 75% less labor compared to hose or pressure washing

City of Anaheim Public Utilities Watermiser Waterbroom Pilot Study

Zero-Water Consumption Urinals

Average savings of 43,680 gallons per fixture per year (0.134 acre-feet per fixture per year)

Significant sewer and water/sewer-related energy use reduction

Federal Energy Management Program & Dept. of Defense Energy & Engineering Division

Pre-Rinse Spray Valves

Annual average for “very small to “small” food establishments:

0.153 acre-feet (significantly higher for greater-volume users)

Annual average for “very small to small” food establishments:  Gas-heated water – 335 therms

Electric-heated water – 7,600 kWh

California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC) & SBW Study

Water Softener Retrofit from Timed-Regeneration to Demand Initiated Regeneration

55 to 63% water savings

Reduced discharge of salt into the

wastewater collection system, which has a negative impact on  wastewater plant

effluent.

Metropolitan Water District/USBR Salinity Management Study – Water Softener Issues

Cooling Tower Conductivity Controllers

Up to 64% water savings (up to 800,000 annually in case studies with larger towers)

Significant reduction in labor, energy, chemical use, and sewage cost

Water Smart Technology – (Group of California municipalities and water agencies)

Water Meters for Sub-metering in Apartments/Multi-family dwellings

11-27% Water Use Reduction

Significantly reduced sewer costs

National Multiple Family Submetering and Allocation Billing Program Study

Irrigation System Hardware Upgrades

Various results, depending on age and condition of existing system

Reduced irrigation run-off, fertilizer/pesticide pollution, and labor reduction

Many sources available (CUWCC, MWD, AWWA, ITRC, IA etc.)

High-Efficiency Commercial Clothes Washers

35-50% water use reduction

Up to 50% of sewer and energy use/cost

Contra Costa Water District, CPUC, & LightWash Program

X-Ray Film Processor Recirculation System

98% of related water use eliminated (i.e. average processor uses 788,400 gallons per year; upgrade reduces wash-water effluent to 13,530 gallons per year

Drastic subsequent sewage and energy savings

Metropolitan Water District

Flow Control Valves for Commercial Use

Reduce water flow by up to 85%, while eliminating loss due to vandalism or aerator damage

Lower water, sewer, and energy bills

US Clean Sweep

SOMAT Waste Reduction Technology

Approx. 81% reduced water consumption for commercial kitchen garbage disposal

Reduced labor by at least 40%, reduced hauling cost due to 80% waste reduction etc.

Presidio of Monterey Study & Manufacturer Specifications

 

*All rebated products will be required to meet specific water saving specifications set forth by the District

U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2005\2005boardpackets\20050526\02\item2_exh2c.doc