ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
17. |
|
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
March 20, 2006 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David A.
Berger, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|
|
|||
Prepared
By: |
Beverly
Chaney / |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
Dave Dettman |
|
|
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance:
N/A |
|||||
AQUATIC HABITAT AND FLOW
CONDITIONS: During February 2006,
During February 2006, the mean daily streamflow recorded at the District’s Carmel River Sleepy Hollow Weir gaging station averaged 131 cubic feet per second (cfs), and ranged from 42 to 1,750 cfs.
There were 3.73 inches of measurable rainfall in February as recorded by Cal-Am at San Clemente Dam (SCD), near the long-term February average of 4.39 inches at this site. The rainfall total for Water Year 2006 to date is 16.11 inches, 103% of the long-term October-February average of 15.57 inches.
WSE at the
ADULT STEELHEAD COUNTS AT
This is the lowest end-of-February total since District staff installed the automatic fish counter in 1994. The average end-of-February total since 2000 is 242 fish. This is especially troubling considering the steep downward trend in total annual number of adult fish passing over SCD since the 2001 season, when 804 fish were counted. In 2005, only 328 fish were counted, but the end-of-February 2005 count was 220, nearly twice the 2006 number. At that rate, less than 250 adults will migrate over SCD in 2006. Several large late February/early March storms brought the river flow back up from very low levels and should allow more adults to migrate upstream and over the dam to their upper spawning grounds.
|
|
SLEEPY HOLLOW STEELHEAD
REARING FACILITY (Facility): On July
14, 2005, staff began accepting rescued steelhead from the lower
District Staff began releasing
fish from the Facility back into the
All released fish were in
excellent physical condition, and many had transformed into smolts. The overall survival rate of fish held at the
Facility in 2005 was 57%. This is a
very favorable result when compared to the survival of wild fish in the lower
The percentage of fish
that died from disease, stress, or handling was moderate in 2005 (25%), with
some bays experiencing much greater mortality than others (13-37%). This could be a function of when and where
the fish were rescued from the river, as the habitat in some reaches was much
worse than in others, so the rescued fish from that reach were more stressed
and disease prone to start with. The
percentage of “unaccounted for” fish in the rearing channel was much less in
2005 (18%) than it was in 2004 (52%).
“Unaccounted for” fish are recorded as mortalities and are most likely
due to the disparity in growth of some individual fish, which reach smolt size,
or greater, approximately 6-10 inches, while other fish remain small. These larger fish can reduce the overall
survival by preying on smaller juvenile steelhead in the channel. The number of “unaccounted for” fish was
significantly reduced this year by thoroughly grading the fish into three size
classes before stocking them in the channel, and by the use of the weirs that
kept the groups separated.
The 2005 results are shown below for young-of-the-year (YOY), and larger, 1+ juvenile fish held in the rearing channel (RC), and the extra-large 1+ juvenile fish held in Tank 3 (T-3).
SHSRF Fish Summary
- July 13, 2005 to March 3,
2006* |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tank # |
# Fish
Added |
Morts (Disease) |
Morts (Unaccounted for) |
Total
Released |
%
Survival |
|
Notes |
R C |
24,373 |
6,176 |
4,366 |
13,831 |
56.8 |
|
YOY (4 –
14” FL at release) Segregated
by bays. |
T-3 |
84 |
4 |
0 |
80 |
95.0 |
|
Extra
Large 1+ fish. Rescued
in September |
Totals |
24,457 |
6,180 |
4,366 |
13,911 |
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaccounted
for fish were most likely eaten by other, larger fish. *Provisional
data. |
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2006\2006boardpackets\20060320\InfoItems\17\item17.doc