ITEM: |
ACTION
ITEMS |
||||
|
|||||
18. |
Review and Comment on Draft
Memorandum of Understanding to form the |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
March 19, 2007 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David A.
Berger, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Same |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: On February 21, 2007 chairpersons and their
designees of water agency governing boards and city councils met to
discuss the current draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) prepared by a
working group of senior managers from those entities (Exhibit 18-A). The draft MOU proposes an inter-agency
committee structure, comprised of a
governing board representative from each signatory entity, which would
be charged with developing a regional strategy for resolving water supply and
water quality problems on the
1) A broad consensus among board and council representatives was apparent to consider forming a Regional Water Solutions Task Force comprised of local policy-makers, for the reasons described in the draft MOU.
2) The draft MOU should be agendized for presentation and discussion by all effected councils and boards, preferably within the next 45 days.
3) Members of the managers working group were requested to solicit feedback from their respective governing board on the draft MOU. This feedback should include a response to the suggestion made by several participants in the February 21 meeting that a $5,000 requested (but not required) contribution be made by each signatory entity, in order to defray the cost of analytical expertise the Task Force may need to develop a regional water supply strategy. This amount would cover any potential technical resource needs, in addition to the Task Force facilitation service and economic analysis offered by the Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) of the California Public Utilities Commission, plus in-kind assistance provided by participating agencies. At the present time, such resource needs have not been identified, but the managers group intends to consult with DRA on the question.
4) The council/board leadership group will meet again to review feedback on the draft MOU, preferably around April 15, but not later than May 30. The meeting purpose would be to finalize the proposed MOU that would be submitted to the governing boards of all interested entities for formal consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the District Board review and provide feedback on the draft MOU.
BACKGROUND: On April 19, 2005 the
Elected and appointed leaders of effected city
councils and water agency governing boards met on April 10, 2006 to review
various governance proposals drafted by the mangers working group. Each of these proposals was intended to
create a comprehensive, coordinated regional strategy for addressing:
1) the
Since last April 10, the senior
managers working group has met several times to obtain further information on
various water supply projects proposed within the region, in order to help
gauge the level of analytical work and strategy facilitation support that the
inter-agency policy advisory committee would require, and how to secure
resources for that support. In the
course of that effort, a team of officials and consultants from the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) engaged the managers group on the status of
efforts within the county to address the water supply problem on a regional
level. This CPUC team is charged with
preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) in order for the CPUC to
consider the Coastal Water Project (Project) submitted by California American
Water (CAW), as well as alternatives state law requires be studied in the
EIR. The Project application consists of
a desalination facility co-located on the Moss Landing energy plant site, with
a proposed maximum yield basically only intended to satisfy the state’s 1995
order to replace 70% of the water the company pumps from the
Late last year, a separate and independent
arm of the CPUC, the Division of Ratepayers Advocates (DRA), approached the
managers group regarding its proposal to engage Monterey Peninsula and north Monterey
County water districts, municipalities and other effected local agencies in a
series of meetings, the purpose of which would be to assist DRA in its analysis
of a possible regional alternative to CAW’s proposed Project. DRA anticipates that the outcome of its
proposed meetings would be a regional strategy that integrates water supply and
water management program alternatives, which potentially would have greater
benefit to CAW ratepayers and other entities outside the
www.mpwmd.dst.ca.us/asd/board/boardpacket/2007/20070125/item17.htm
The managers concluded that
DRA’s proposal appeared to be fully consistent with the April 10, 2006
leadership group consensus that water supply and water quality problems facing
the
EXHIBITS
18-A Monterey Bay Regional Water Solutions Leadership Task Force Memorandum of Understanding (draft version 4)
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2007\2007boardpackets\20070319\ActionItems\18\item18.doc