TO: Chair Pendergrass, Vice Chair
Edwards and General Manager Berger
FROM: David C. Laredo, General Counsel
RE:
__________________
This
memo provides a summary of modifications made to the previous Concept Draft
Ordinance (October 1, 2007 version) that proposed establishment of a Sand City
Water Entitlement based upon the City’s Desalination Water Supply Project. Provided for your use are both a redlined and
clean draft of Ordinance No. 132 that is proposed for first reading based upon
the recommendation of the Rules and Regulations Review Committee.
Many
of the policy issues presented in the context of this draft ordinance are
similar to those previously addressed in Ordinance No. 109 that enabled expansion
of the CAWD/PBCSD reclamation project and creation of the water entitlement for
that circumstance.
The
draft ordinance incorporates several modifications from that previously
provided to the Board in the concept version.
The draft includes updated references to the Water Distribution System
Permits issued at the October meeting for both the Sand City Desalination
Facility
(WDS Permit No. M07-02-L4) and the CAW Water System (WDS Permit No. M07-03-L4).
Several references to the Desalination Water Supply Project have been
made in the draft ordinance to recognize that the Board has now acted to issue
these permits (e.g. Statement of Purpose at Section Two, and Finding 18).
Finding
18 now also clarifies that the Project shall address both problems associated
with the
The
draft ordinance allows the Board to affirm, by Finding 11, that the Water
Entitlement is separate and distinct from
Both
the concept and draft versions of the ordinance required recipients of the Sand
City Water Entitlement to comply with water conservation rules set forth in
MPWMD Regulation XIV and water rationing rules set forth in MPWMD Regulation XV. The draft version, however, has been amended
to clarify that MPWMD shall not impose a moratorium on issuance of Water Use
Permits authorized pursuant to this ordinance.
This provision is consonant with the manner in which recipients of the
Pebble Beach Entitlement shall be treated under Ordinance No. 109 in the event
a connection moratorium was to be enacted.
It
should be noted that the strike out text in Sections Four and Five of the
ordinance do not indicate a change from the concept version. That text shows changes that shall be made to
the existing District Rules and Regulations, and are consistent with the
proposals set forth in the original concept version.
Section
Six adds definitions that were not included in the earlier concept draft.
Sections
Seven and following incorporate general implementation language, a severability
clause, and clarify the effective date for the ordinance.
David C. Laredo
General Counsel
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2007\2007boardpackets\20071119\PubHrgs\14\item14_exh14a.doc