FINAL
MONTEREY
PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 19, 2007 – September 30, 2007
February 8,
2008, Update
THREE-YEAR
GOAL: Establish
respectful and effective relationships among the District, CAW, public,
jurisdictions and the Water Master
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1. On Aug. 30, 2007 |
Board |
Hold a special meeting with the
CAW General Manager to learn about the operation and regulation of CAW
Monterey Division (see suggestion #1 from attached document approved by the
Board on 2/22/07). |
ü |
|
|
Meeting conducted August 30,
2007 at 7 PM in the District Conference Room.
Meeting was cablecast beginning 9/8/07 on Channels 25 and 28. |
2.
By Mar.
17, 2008 |
General Manager (lead) and the Public
Information Coordinator |
Develop and implement a
procedure to implement suggestions #3 and #4 from the document approved on
2/22/07 for improving understanding and cooperation between CAW and MPWMD
(see attachment at the end of this record). |
|
|
ü |
Public Outreach Committee will
meet Feb/March to discuss. Target
completion date adjusted. |
3.
By Mar. 17, 2008 |
Public Outreach Committee (Board
Member |
Develop a Public Outreach Plan
to educate the public on District activities and regulation changes. |
|
|
ü |
Public Outreach Committee will meet
Feb/March to review plan prior to presentation to the Board. Target completion date adjusted. |
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
4.
|
General Manager (lead) and Board
Members |
Make a presentation to each
jurisdiction regarding water issues affecting the jurisdictions. |
ü |
|
|
Final presentation completed on
9/11/07. |
5.
|
Water Demand Manager (lead) and
TAC |
Document and implement a process
for educating the jurisdictions and the public on changes to District permit
regulations. |
ü |
|
|
Process was developed and
communicated to the Technical Advisory Committee on May 1, 2007. Minor amendments were made at the 11/3/07
Public Outreach Committee meeting. |
6.
|
Senior Hydrogeologist |
Initiate work under the initial
contract with the |
ü |
|
|
Contract work under Phase 1
implementation of the MMP was completed in 12/07. Phase 2 budgets approved by
Watermaster Board on 10/17/07. Phase 2 contract authorized by Watermaster
Board in December 2007. Phase 2
contract executed in February 2007. |
THREE-YEAR
GOAL: Determine and participate
in long-term water supply solution(s)
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1. Ongoing |
General Manager and District
Counsel (co-leads) |
Continue active participation in
CA PUC Coastal Water Project (CWP)
process, including environmental review
and Division of Ratepayer Advocates processes. |
|
ü |
|
Chair and staff are regular
participants on monthly REPOG meetings, and staff attended technical
sub-groups. |
2. Ongoing |
Senior Hydrogeologist |
Provide technical support or
guidance to the MRWPCA for its Groundwater Replenishment Project in the |
|
ü |
|
Staff is participating in project
coordination meetings, and providing follow-up review of technical and
planning documents. |
3.
|
General Manager |
Present to the Board for
consideration an MOU for participation in the Monterey Bay Regional Water Solutions
Task Force to evaluate regional water solutions. |
ü |
|
|
Board adopted draft MOU at its
June 18, 2007 meeting. Representatives
of jurisdictions/ agencies involved in formation of the Monterey Bay Regional
Water Authority adopted final draft MOU on 7/23/07. Distributed to jurisdictions/agencies for
final approval. |
4.
|
General Manager |
Present to the Board the Community
Advisory Committee Report on projects listed in the matrix of water supply
alternatives. |
ü |
|
|
Community Advisory Committee
conducted final meeting and approved report to the Board on 9/11/07. Board received the report on 9/17/07. |
FUTURE:
By Mar. 17, 2008 |
District Engineer (lead) and
Project Manager |
Refine the matrix of water
supply alternatives (using the quantified supply target) to incorporate results
of the revised Bookman-Edmonston/GEI report evaluating desalination projects. |
|
|
ü |
BE/GEI final report to be
received by Board on 2/28/08, and Matrix to be presented at 3/17/08
meeting. Target completion date
adjusted. |
THREE-YEAR
GOAL: Complete
ASR Phase 1 and expanded ASR Project(s)
ASR PHASE 1 OBJECTIVES:
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1.
|
District Engineer |
Secure SWRCB water rights permit
for Phase 1 ASR project (if not, ASR team will prepare for water rights
hearing). |
ü |
|
|
Protests by CDFG and NMFS
withdrawn and hearing cancelled in Sept. 2007. SWRCB Water Rights Division
staff issued amended permit for Phase 1 ASR Project on 11/30/07. CDFG signed off on permit condition
related to streambed alteration agreement on 2/4/08. |
2.
|
Senior Hydrogeologist |
Complete Well #2 for Phase 1 ASR,
including final facilities design and contractor selection. |
ü |
|
|
Staff and consultant work on
initial facilities design completed in 10/08.
Prepared design plans for initial facilities construction; awarded
construction contract in 1/08. Work currently
underway. |
3.
|
Senior Hydrogeologist |
Determine the feasibility of a
dual-well injection test and report the results to the General Manager. |
ü |
|
|
ASR coordination agreement
drafted. MCWD Board approved MOA on 11/14/07.
Inter-agency agreement approved by MPWMD Board in 12/07. MCWRA action pending to enable
implementation. |
4.
|
Senior Hydrogeologist, in cooperation
with CAW |
Facilitate determination and
schedule for completion of necessary infrastructure improvements to the CAW
system to ensure they are in place to support Phase 1 ASR. |
ü |
|
|
ASR coordination meeting held
with CAW 4/18/07 and 10/2/07. CAW
submitted basis of design report to CPUC on 11/15/07. |
5.
By Feb. 25, 2008 |
District Counsel |
Confirm water storage rights
with the Watermaster. |
|
|
ü |
Opinion by District Counsel has
been prepared. District staff will
notify and make presentation to Watermaster.
Target completion date adjusted. |
EXPANDED ASR PROJECT(S) OBJECTIVES:
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1.
By Sept. 2008 |
Team Water Rights (General
Manager-lead, General Counsel, District Engineer, Water Resources Manager, Senior
Hydrogeologist and Senior Fisheries Biologist) |
Complete negotiations with CAW
for joint ownership of water rights, to obtain future ASR and other water
rights permit(s). |
|
|
ü |
Limited progress since December
2006. Focus has been securing water
rights for Phase 1 ASR Project. Target
completion date adjusted to allow time for expanded ASR Project(s) to be
defined and to negotiate agreements, and follow-through on legal issues raised
in 12/13/07 joint MPWMD and CAW meeting with SWRCB staff. |
2.
By April
21, 2008 |
Water Resources Manager, in
cooperation with CAW |
Develop a project description and
yield estimate for expanded ASR and present to the Board. |
|
|
ü |
Staff provided comments on a
draft Technical Memorandum describing a Conceptual Development Plan for an
Expanded ASR Project. Coordination and
assistance to CAW consultants continues. Target completion date adjusted.
|
THREE-YEAR
GOAL: Enhance
revenue from external resources
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1.
|
General Manager (lead) and Water
Demand Manager |
Complete reimbursement agreement
for the Conservation Program with CAW. |
ü |
|
|
Draft agreement sent to CAW 4/22/07;
CAW comments received; CAW reviewing revised, final draft. Board adopted agreement on 9/17/07. |
2.
|
District Engineer |
Complete and submit to the Board
for action the IRWMP (Integrated Regional Water Management Plan) to compete
for State grant funds. |
ü |
|
|
Board reviewed Draft IRWMP and
received initial public comment on 7/18/07.
Approved MOU to form water management group to implement IRWMP. Board approved final IRWMP 11/19/07. |
3.
|
Water Resources Manager |
Apply for 100% NMFS/CAW
settlement agreement funding of the Water Intake Retrofit Project at the Sleepy
Hollow Fish Rearing Facility. |
ü |
|
|
$684,000 included in FY 2007-08
budget. NMFS funding request sent
1/30/08. |
4.
|
Chief Financial Officer (lead), Administrative
Committee and the Board |
Secure funding through a debt
issuance for ASR Phase 1. |
ü |
|
|
Board approved staff
recommendation to fund on a pay-as-you-go basis on 11/19/07. |
5.
By May 31, 2008 |
Chief Financial Officer (lead), General Counsel and the
Administrative Committee |
Monitor the future CPUC rate
increase requests and project potential impact on MPWMD. |
|
|
ü |
CAW briefing staff on next General
Rate Case key assumptions continuing.
Target completion date adjusted.
|
THREE-YEAR
GOAL: Enhance
and protect the water resources of the
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
1. Beginning immediately and ongoing |
Board Member David Potter (lead)
and the District Engineer |
Provide support data and
participate in the Big Sur Land Trust (BSLT) Carmel River Parkway Project. |
|
ü |
|
Staff participating in project
development. BSLT staff gave
presentation to the Board on 8/20/07. |
2.
|
Water Demand Manager |
Present to the Board for
direction the amendment of Rule 23 to reflect new metering technology. |
ü |
|
|
In-line metering technology is available
through CAW, making it unnecessary to change Rule 23 to reflect this
technology. |
3.
By Mar. 17, 2008 |
Water Resources Manager (lead) and
the Water Demand Manager |
Present to the Board for their
discussion a possible environmental trigger related to stream flow that would
require existing conservation measures during low-flow years. |
|
|
ü |
Technical report on
establishment of environmental trigger related to streamflow to be presented
to Board on 3/17/08. Target completion
date adjusted. |
4.
By Feb.
28, 2008 |
General Counsel |
Present to the Board for
direction an ordinance to amend the process by which the District enforces
its rules and regulations. |
|
|
ü |
Rules & Regulations Review
Committee reviewed concept ordinance for third time on 1/7/08, based on Board’s
re-referral for further refinements and clarifications. Committee to review final draft on 2/19/08.
Board first reading set for 2/28/08.
Target completion date adjusted accordingly. |
WHEN
|
WHO
|
WHAT
|
STATUS |
COMMENTS |
||
|
|
|
DONE |
ON TARGET |
REVISED |
|
5.
By April 21, 2008 |
Water Demand Manager (lead) and
Water Resources Manager |
Present to the Board for its consideration
an ordinance that will include all areas of the |
|
|
ü |
Water Demand Committee will
review draft ordinance in March for presentation to Board in April. Target
completion date adjusted accordingly. |
6.
|
Water Demand Manager (lead) and Water Resources Manager, working with CAW
and the Seaside Municipal Water System, and in consultation with the
Watermaster |
Present to the Water Demand
Committee a draft contingency plan to implement Stages 5-7 of the Expanded
Conservation and Standby Rationing Plan in case of drought. |
ü |
|
|
Preliminary meetings with CAW
are underway. Water Demand Committee
reviewed item on 9/11 and 10/4/07, and Board accepted draft plan
1/24/08. |
List of
Suggestions for Improving Understanding and Cooperation between
Adopted February 22, 2007
1. Conduct a televised workshop on August 30,
2007 that would provide
2. Mr. Leonard invited the District Board members
to tour CAW facilities to increase their understanding of the complicated
system they are regulating. The Board
should make a visit to San Clemente Dam and view the siltation that has
occurred. Directors should also see the
3. CAW could inform the District before it begins infrastructure improvements, such as replacement of a water main in a sensitive area. The District would then be prepared to make statements in support of the work when warranted. This would alleviate confusion among members of the public as to whether or not the District was in someway responsible for the project.
4. CAW and the District should jointly develop press releases on projects they are developing cooperatively.
5. For issues that have potential as publicly reported disagreements, CAW and the District commit to discussion in order to reach a common understanding of the facts, and mutual recognition of divergent perspectives.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2008\2008boardpackets\20080213\strategicplan.doc