EXHIBIT 19-E
FINAL MINUTES
Technical Advisory
Committee of the
Monterey Peninsula
Water Management District
The meeting was called to order at 9:30 AM.
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Sean Conroy
City of Monterey Chip Rerig
City of Pacific Grove Patricia Wotan
City of Sand City Steve Matarazzo
City of Seaside Diana Ingersoll, Chair
County of Monterey Luis Osorio
Monterey Peninsula
Airport District Ben Stuth
City of Del Rey Oaks Ron Langford
David A. Berger, General Manager
Stephanie Pintar, Water Demand Manager
Arlene Tavani, Executive Assistant
District Counsel Present:
David C. Laredo
No members of the public were present to comment.
1.
Receive Minutes of August 14, 2007 and
November 6, 2007 Committee Meetings
The minutes were received by the committee as
presented.
2.
Consider Recommendation to MPWMD Board on
Revision to Committee Charge Regarding Election of Chair
On a motion by Rerig and second by Conroy,
the committee voted to recommend that the Board adopt the amendment to the
charge as presented. The motion was
approved unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0.
3. Review Contingency Implementation Plan
for Stages 4 through 7 of the Expanded Water Conservation and Standby Rationing
Plan
On a motion by Matarazzo and second by Rerig, the committee voted to
recommend to the Board of Directors that the Contingency Implementation Plan be
approved and that it allow a four-month delay before a moratorium is
implemented in the event Stage 5 or 6 is declared at any time other than the
May Board meeting. The motion was
approved unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0.
4. Discuss Proposed Draft Ordinance –
Adding a Process for Sub-Potable Water Use Credits to the District’s Rules and
Regulations
Chair Ingersol stated
that the consensus of the committee was to recommend to the Board that a joint
meeting of the Technical Advisory and Policy Advisory committees be convened to
review the proposed ordinance and discuss two issues: (1) proposed rule that would require 25% of
the previous potable water use to be permanently set aside as conservation
savings; and (2) cost-sharing to fund an EIR on the transfer of sub-potable
water credits.
5. Review and Comment on Proposed Draft
Concept Ordinance – Amend Process by which the District Enforces its Rules and
Regulations
The committee discussed
the concept ordinance. The following
comments were received: (1) Rerig: The City of Monterey does have an
administrative enforcement process. City
staff serve as hearing officers. Payment schedules can be established for
persons that request it. He expressed support for the concept ordinance, and
advised that the public should be informed about why the ordinance is
necessary. (2) Matarazzo: The City of
Del Rey Oaks does have an administrative enforcement process. When a citation is issued, the offender must
pay the fine. If the fine is not paid,
the issue goes to court. (3) Ingersol expressed
support for the concept ordinance.
Informational Items
6. Report on Proposed Ordinance No. 132 –
Add a New Rule 23.6 to Establish a Water Entitlement for Sand City and Amend
Rules 11, 21 and 23.1 to Reflect the Process for Issuing Water Use Permits
General Manager Berger reviewed the ordinance and responded to questions
from the committee.
7. Review and Discuss Proposed Amendment
to Table 2: Non-Residential Water Use
Factors
Water Demand Manager Pintar reviewed Table 2 and responded to questions
from the committee.
Adjournment
The meeting was
adjourned at 11 AM.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2008\2008boardpackets\20080519\InfoItems\19\item19_exh19e.doc