EXHIBIT 9-D
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT
DRAFT
FINDINGS of APPROVAL
CONSIDER APPLICATION TO AMEND
TO ANNEX 12 RESIDENTIAL
LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH CARMEL VALLEY RANCH
Service area: APN 416-522-020
MPWMD Application #20071212CVR-L4,
Permit #M08-02-L4
Adopted by MPWMD District Board on
September ___, 2008
Unless noted otherwise, all cited documents and
materials are available for review at the MPWMD Office,
It
is hereby found and determined as follows:
1. FINDING:
EVIDENCE: Application #20071212CVR-L4, site map and application materials dated December
12, 2007. Additional application materials
submitted January 29, 2008. Monterey
County Resolution #06-366 and approval documentation associated with PLN020280
dated December 19, 2006. Responsible Planning Advocates v.
2. FINDING: Roughly one-half of the subject parcel is presently
within the CAW service boundary. The
application requests approval to annex the portion of the parcel not already
served by CAW within the boundaries of the proposed 12-lot subdivision to
facilitate service to the 12 single-family residential lots that comprise 113.4
acres of the 218-acre parcel; remaining acreage is zoned as open space or
roads, and will not be serviced by CAW.
EVIDENCE: Permit application materials as specified
in Finding #1; map of CAW service area.
3. FINDING: No new wells or water supply facilities regulated by
MPWMD are associated with this permit application. The
EVIDENCE: Permit application as specified in
Finding #1. Letter from Monterey County
Water Resources Agency dated January 30, 2008.
MPWMD Board Packet for August 18, 2008, Item 23, Exhibit 23-A.
4. FINDING: Applicant has applied for a permit to amend the CAW
system to annex the portion of parcel APN 416-522-020 not already served by CAW
to enable water service by CAW to 12 residential lots previously approved by
Monterey County in 2006.
EVIDENCE: Permit application materials as specified
in Finding #1.
5. FINDING: The application does not entail an increase in the total
CAW production limit from the
EVIDENCE:
6. FINDING: The application to amend the CAW water distribution system, along with supporting materials, is in accordance with District Rules 21 and 22.
EVIDENCE: Permit application materials as
specified in Finding #1.
Required Findings (MPWMD Rule 22-B)
7. FINDING: The approval of the permit would not cause unnecessary duplication
of water service with any existing system.
The project would be served by CAW, the primary water purveyor in
EVIDENCE: Map of CAW service area; MPWMD Permit #M08-02-L4, Conditions of Approval #1 through #4.
8. FINDING: The approval of the permit would not result in water
importation or exportation to or from the District, respectively. [Rule 22-B-2]
EVIDENCE: The referenced property is located
wholly within the MPWMD as shown on District boundary location maps.
9. FINDING: Approval of the application would not result in
significant adverse impacts to “Sensitive Environmental Receptors” as defined
by MPWMD Rule 11, including the Carmel Valley Alluvial Aquifer (CVAA). As noted in Finding #5, there would be no change
to current CAW production limits, and no net increase in allowed water use associated
with Carmel Valley Ranch because water earmarked for previously approved, but
undeveloped, residential lots within Carmel Valley Ranch was re-allocated to
the proposed 12-lot project in 2006; also 11 lots previously zoned for
development were re-zoned to open space.
MPWMD permit conditions require that water use for the 12 lots remain
within the 8.807 AFY allotment. [Rule
22-B-3]
EVIDENCE: Permit application materials as
specified in Finding #1, including Monterey County File PLN020280 and associated
Resolution 06-366; MPWMD Permit
#M08-02-L4, Condition of Approval #3.
10. FINDING: The
water rights associated with the application are those of CAW. The SWRCB has identified 3,376 AFY as CAW’s
recognized rights to divert water from the
EVIDENCE: SWRCB Order 95-10 and Decision #1632,
both issued in July 1995.
11. FINDING: The
application demonstrates existence of a long-term reliable source of water
supply for the proposed use of up to 8.807 AFY for domestic use. Water would be provided by CAW, a public
utility certified by the State Department of Public Health, which has the physical
ability to serve the parcel. The 8.807
AFY allotment from
EVIDENCE: CAW service records and water quality
evaluations on file at the State Department of Public Health,
12. FINDING: CAW’s
primary source of water supply to serve lots in
EVIDENCE: Permit Application materials as
specified in Finding #1, including County File PLN020280 and associated County
Board Resolution 06-366. MPWMD
Permit #M08-02-L4, Condition of Approval #3. SWRCB Order 95-10 as amended by subsequent
Orders. Annual interagency Memorandum of
Agreements regarding CAW reservoir releases and flow rates; quarterly water
supply strategy and budget for CAW operations in the
13. FINDING: The
source of supply for the subject parcel is derived from the Carmel Valley
Alluvial Aquifer and the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System because the
source of water is the CAW distribution system. The source of supply is also within the
jurisdiction of the SWRCB, and has not been determined to be tributary to the
source of supply for any other system.
The subject parcel does not overlie the CVAA but water delivered by CAW
is derived from the CVAA. [Rule 22-B-7]
EVIDENCE: MPWMD map showing boundaries of project
site and jurisdiction of SWRCB superimposed on
14. FINDING: MPWMD
Permit #M08-02-L4 does not allow
a permanent intertie to any other water distribution system. The subject parcel and future lots will be connected
to and served by the integrated CAW system, including water for emergency fire
protection. Temporary water service via trucked-in water
pursuant to MPWMD Rule 173 could occur if the CAW system experienced a fire or
other non-fire emergency situation. [Rule 22-B-8]
EVIDENCE: Map of CAW service area available at
District office; MPWMD Permit # M08-02-L4,
Condition of Approval #13. MPWMD Rules
and Regulations.
15. FINDING: A
back-flow protection device to prevent contamination of the CAW system is not determined
to be necessary as CAW is the supplier. [Rule
22-B-9]
EVIDENCE: Map of CAW service area; MPWMD Permit # M08-02-L4, Condition of Approval #14.
Minimum Standards for Granting a Permit
(MPWMD Rule 22-C)
16. FINDING: The
application adequately identifies the responsible parties as California
American Water, the water system owner and Carmel Valley Mortgage Borrower,
LLC, a
EVIDENCE: Permit application specified in Finding
#1, and Grant Deed for parcel.
17. FINDING: The
application meets the definition of a “multiple-parcel connection system” and must
therefore comply with California Title 22 water quality standards; CAW is a
regulated public utility. [Rule 22-C-2]
EVIDENCE: Permit application as specified in
Finding #1. MPWMD Permit #M08-02-L4, Conditions
of Approval #1, #2, #3, and #15; California Administrative Code, Title 22.
18. FINDING: The
application identifies the location of the source of supply for water
distribution system (integrated CAW system, primarily from wells in
EVIDENCE: Permit application as specified in
Finding #1, including location map. MPWMD
Permit #M08-02-L4, Condition of Approval #4.
19. FINDING: The
EVIDENCE: MPWMD hydrologic monitoring data and
annual reports; MPWMD Permit #M08-02-L4,
Condition of Approval #3. SWRCB Order 95-10 as amended by subsequent
Orders, including Order 98-08 issued November 19, 1998.
20. FINDING: The
approval of the application would not adversely affect the ability of existing
systems to provide water to users due to conditions of approval that do not
allow increased CAW production to serve the subject parcel. CAW water rights in relation to other CVAA
users have been assessed by the SWRCB and limited by that agency. [Rule 22-C-5]
EVIDENCE: SWRCB Order 95-10 as amended by
subsequent Orders. MPWMD Permit #M08-02-L4, Condition of Approval #3.
Compliance with
21. FINDING: In
the review of this application, MPWMD has followed those guidelines adopted by
the State of
Copies
of the Monterey County CEQA documents adopted on December 19, 2006 have been
provided to MPWMD Board members for review prior to the public hearing on this
matter. The MPWMD Board has considered
the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration previously prepared and
approved by the
EVIDENCE: CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15096. County File PLN020280 and associated County
Board Resolution 06-366. MPWMD Notice of
Determination dated September __, 2008.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2008\2008boardpackets\20080922\PublicHrgs\09\item9_exh9d.doc