EXHIBIT 1-A |
|||
DRAFT MINUTES Regular
Meeting Board of
Directors Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District July 20, 2009 |
|||
The meeting was called to
order at 7:05 PM in the District Conference Room. |
|
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL |
|
Directors Present: Kristi Markey, Chair --
Division 3 Alvin Edwards – Division 1 Judi Lehman – Division 2 Bob Brower – Division 5 David Potter – Directors Absent: None General Manager present: District Counsel present: David C.
Laredo |
|
|
|
The assembly recited the
Pledge of Allegiance. |
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
The following comments were
received during Oral Communications. (1) George Riley requested that the
District undertake a recalculation of the future water needs estimates
submitted by the jurisdictions and cited in the Draft EIR on the Coastal
Water Project. (2) Gary Koifman suggested that an alternative to constructing
one desalination plant in Moss Landing would be to dock refurbished, antique ships
in |
|
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
On a motion by Director
Pendergrass and second by Director Lehman, the Consent Calendar was approved
unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0. |
|
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|
Approved. |
|
1. |
Consider Adoption of Minutes of the June 15, 2009
Regular Board Meeting |
Approved. |
|
2. |
Consider Adoption of
Memorandums of Understanding Between the Monterey Peninsula Water Management
District and the General and Management Staff Bargaining Units |
Approved. |
|
3. |
Consider Adoption of Revised
Charge to the Ad Hoc Legislative Advocacy Committee and Confirm the
Appointment of Alternates to the Committee |
||
Approved. |
|
4. |
Consider Authorization of
Staff to Proceed with Filing an Application for a Department of Water
Resources Construction Loan to Fund the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project
Expansion |
||
Approved. |
|
5. |
Consider Expenditure of
Budgeted Funds to Contract with DHDettman to Provide Advice on Emergency
Repairs for the Sleepy Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility, and Other Facility
Support Tasks |
||
Approved. |
|
6. |
Consider Expenditure of
Budgeted Funds for Amendment to Database Programming Contract to Accommodate
Changes for Ordinance No. 139 Implementation and Functionality Improvements |
||
Approved. |
|
7. |
Authorize Expenditure of
Budgeted Funds to Contract with Spot Water Management to Conduct Certified
Landscape Irrigation Auditor Training |
||
Approved. |
|
8. |
Consider Expenditure of
Funds to Contract with RMC to Fund Continuation of the Ongoing Water for |
||
Approved. |
|
9. |
Consider Adoption of
Treasurer's Report for May 2009 |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
PRESENTATIONS |
|||
Mr. Anthony reported the
following. (1) Well No. 2 in the Bishop Water Distribution System was
recently refurbished. By combining
production from active wells in both the Bishop and Ryan Ranch systems,
sufficient water could be produced to meet firm capacity at Ryan Ranch. In
order to achieve this production level, Cal-Am still needs authorization from
the District to connect a new distribution line to the Bishop system. (2) Cal-Am installed 4,000 acoustic
listening devices on water meters; however, approximately 20 percent of them
malfunctioned. In response, the 4,000
devices will be replaced beginning in August.
(3) Mr. Anthony will be
meeting with David Goff to review results of the study he prepared on
Cal-Am’s unaccounted for system losses, and discuss the efforts Cal-Am has
made to replace faulty water meters. (4) Cal-Am has replaced three |
|
10. |
Monthly Report from California American Water
General Manager, Craig Anthony |
||
|
|
|
|
||
Henrietta Stern, Project
Manager, presented the report. An
outline of Ms. Stern’s presentation is on file at the District office and can
be viewed at the District’s website. |
|
11. |
Water
Supply Project Alternatives Update |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
12. |
Water Conservation Program Report |
||
|
|
GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT |
|||
|
|
13. |
Status Report on |
||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ATTORNEY’S REPORT |
|||
Mr. Laredo stated that he
provided a status report on items 3.A through 3.G, no reportable action was
taken. The Board also discussed item
4, no reportable action was taken. |
|
14. |
Report
on 5:30 PM Closed Session of the Board |
||
|
|
|
3. |
Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code 54945.9 (a)) |
|
|
|
|
A. |
Application
of California American Water Company to the Public Utilities Commission
Application No. 04-09-019 – Coastal Water Project |
|
|
|
|
B. |
Application of California –American Water Company for an Order Authorizing a Special
Conservation Program and Modifications to its Rate Design in its Monterey
District, and Authorization to Increase its Rates for Water Service in its
Monterey District –
Conservation Program (Applications No. 07-12-010, 08-02-018) |
|
|
|
|
C. |
Application of |
|
|
|
|
D. |
SWRCB Cease and Desist Order WR 2008-00XX-DWR |
|
|
|
|
E. |
|
|
|
|
|
F. |
Sierra Club, Carmel River
Steelhead Association v. California American Water, Gary Locke, Department Of
Commerce, Dr. Jane Lubchenko (NOAA), and Rodney McInnis (NMFS), (U.S.
District Court, Northern District. Case No. 09 2870) |
|
|
|
|
G. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Conference with Labor
Negotiators (Gov. Code §54957.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
Agency
Designated Representative: |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrepresented
Employees: Confidential Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTORS’ REPORTS (INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS ON
TRIPS, CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS) |
|||
Director Brower reported
that he and Director Markey participated in the July 9, 2009 joint meeting of
the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency Board of Directors and
the Ad Hoc Water Committee regarding development of agreements associated with
planning a regional water supply project.
Director Brower noted that he attended the July 13, 2009 Public
Participation Hearings conducted by the California Public Utilities
Commission on the Coastal Water Project.
Director Lehman reported that she attended all four sessions conducted
on July 13 and 14. Ms. Lehman
expressed support for revising estimates of the jurisdictions’ future water
needs. Director Doyle agreed. She asked if District staff could develop a
theory on why water consumption in the District has been reduced. Is it attributed to the economic
turndown? And if so, will water use
increase again as the economy improves? |
|
15. |
Oral Report on Activities of County, Cities, Other
Agencies/Committees/ Associations |
||
|
|
PUBLIC HEARINGS |
|||
Motion 1 -- Director
Brower offered a motion, that was seconded by Director Potter, to receive
water permit applications for projects within the Hidden Hills area served by
Cal-Am that were submitted to Monterey County for processing or have been
assigned a PLN number on or before March 20, 2009. Only applications for projects that require
a water permit, or setting a new meter for that project, will be accepted. Applications for lot-line adjustments and
subdivisions would not be received by the District. In addition, the General Manager’s decision
that California-American Water is in violation of Rule 40-D will remain in
effect until the General Manager has determined, with credible expert
analysis, that the system can and will remain in compliance. Motion 2 -- Director
Pendergrass offered a substitute motion that District staff should receive
water permit applications for projects within the Hidden Hills area served by
Cal-Am through August 1, 2009. In
addition, the District should negotiate with Cal-Am on resolving the alleged
violation. There was no second to the
motion. Motion 1 was adopted
unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0. Chair Markey requested that the Water
Demand Committee discuss the possibility of future action regarding
modifications to Rule 40-D. |
|
16. |
Consider Appeals of General Manager’s March 20, 2009
Decision Regarding Hidden Hills Unit of California American Water
Distribution System – Notice of Violation of District Rule 40-D and
Suspension of Receipt of Applications For New or Intensified Water Use |
||
Appeal denied with
additional direction that if the project had been submitted to During the public hearing
on this item, Gary Wiegand expressed disagreement with implementation of a
water permit moratorium in the Hidden Hills area. He proposed that the Pro Rata Expansion
Capacity (PREC) in the Hidden Hills area should be raised, and a
corresponding reduction be made to the Bishop Water Company PREC. He requested that the option to adjust the
PREC be incorporated into the Hidden Hills PREC Solutions Matrix. |
|
|
A. |
Gary E. Wiegand |
|
Appeal denied with
additional direction that if the project had been submitted to During the public hearing
on this item, Doug Meador addressed the Board. He agreed with comments made by previous
speakers. He requested that the Board
allow his project to move forward. He suggested that if the water permit
moratorium were to continue, District staffing levels should be decreased due
to a reduction in workload. |
|
|
B. |
James Douglas Meador and LuAnn Meador |
|
Appeal denied with
additional direction. Refer to Motion
1.
The request to accept applications for projects that were in process
with The following comments were
directed to the Board during the public hearing on this item. (1)
Craig Anthony referred to Exhibit 16-C of the staff report, a letter from
Cal-Am dated July 14, 2009. He also
submitted three charts for Board review:
Monterey Main System Production January 2008 through December 2009;
Monterey Main System Consumption January 2008 through June 2009; Hidden Hills
1818 Consumption January 2008 through June 2009; and Hidden Hills Production
January 2008 through June 2009. The
charts are on file at the District office and can be viewed on the District’s
website. He recommended that all
pending water permit applications be approved; and that the District accept
quarterly reports from Cal-Am on efforts to bring the Hidden Hills water
distribution system into compliance. (2) Gary Koifman, resident of Bay Ridge, submitted a letter dated
July 20, 2009, requesting that the District accept his application for an
appeal of the policy suspending receipt of applications for new or
intensified water use. (3) Paul Bruno, resident of |
|
|
C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
At 9:30 PM the meeting recessed and reconvened at
9:40 PM |
|
|
|
||
|
|
ACTION ITEMS |
|||
Staff was directed to
submit the proposed rules to the Policy and Technical Advisory Committees for
review before the Board conducts first reading. No comments were directed to the Board
during the public comment period on this item. |
|
17. |
Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Water Credits
Associated with Mandatory District Conservation Requirements Resulting from
Proposed Updates to Regulation XIV, Water Conservation |
||
|
|
|
|
||
Director Markey offered
a motion that was seconded by Director Brower to: (1) approve Resolution No. 2009-10 amending
Table 4 of Rule 25.5; (2) applicants that have obtained a permit to install
half-gallon per flush toilets may replace them with high-efficiency toilets,
or modify their water permits to install high-efficiency toilets; (3)
replacement of the half-gallon per flush toilets, or modification of a water
permit will trigger a deed restriction amendment, and the applicant must pay
the fees associated with that change; and (4) the applicant will not be
required to undertake additional
conservation savings to off-set the change in water use capacity. Director Lehman offered
an amendment that was approved by Directors Markey and Brower, that District
staff be encouraged to review the efficiency of other approved low-water use
technologies, and determine if any evidence exists that would prompt
reconsideration of their use within the District. The amended motion was approved on a vote
of 6 – 1. Directors Markey, Brower,
Lehman, Doyle, Pendergrass and Potter voted in favor of the motion. Director Edwards was opposed. Don Goodhugh addressed the
Board during the public comment period.
He asked the Board to modify the rules so that his water permit could
be finalized, and construction of his new home could commence. |
|
18. |
Provide Policy Direction to Staff on Water Permits
Utilizing Half-Gallon Per Flush Toilets |
||
Approved. Refer to
motion shown above. |
|
|
A. |
Approve Resolution No. 2009-10 Amending Table 4 of
Rule 25.5: Ultra-Low Consumption Appliance Credits |
|
Refer to direction provided
in the motion shown above. |
|
|
B. |
Provide Direction Regarding Compliance with Water
Permit Conditions Requiring Half-Gallon Per Flush Toilets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no discussion of
the Informational Items/Staff Reports. |
|
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
|||
|
|
19. |
Letters Received |
||
|
|
20. |
Committee
Reports |
||
|
|
21. |
|
||
|
|
22. |
Water
Conservation Program Report |
||
|
|
23. |
Monthly
Allocation Report |
||
|
|
24. |
Monthly
|
||
|
|
25. |
Monthly
Water Supply Status Report |
||
|
|
26. |
Quarterly
Water Supply Project Status Report |
||
|
|
27. |
Quarterly
Irrigation Program and Riparian Projects Report |
||
|
|
28. |
|
||
|
|
29. |
Quarterly
Water Use Credit Transfer Status Report |
||
|
|
|
|
||
The meeting was adjourned
at 10:15 PM. |
|
ADJOURNMENT |
|||
___________________________________
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2009\20090817\ConsentCal\01\item1_exh1a.doc