EXHIBIT 23-E
Final
MINUTES
MONTEREY PENINSULA WATER
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
10:00 A.M. Regular Meeting at
Mid-Carmel Valley Fire Station Community Room
April 9, 2009
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: John
Dalessio, Vince Frumkin, Tom House, Larry Levine,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Rogers (excused absence)
PUBLIC PRESENT: Monica
Hunter (Planning and Conservation League), Tom Skiles (Monterey County Water
Resources Agency), William “Bill” Phillips (Monterey County Water Resources
Agency), Joyce Ambrosius (National
STAFF
PRESENT:
2.
PUBLIC COMMENT
– Monica Hunter announced an upcoming meeting on May 28, 2009 of the Coast and
Ocean Regional Roundtable for
John Dalessio described a recent
Supreme Court decision that would allow a private water company, such as
California American Water, to partner with a public agency to own a
desalination plant in
3.
CONSENT
CALENDAR – there were no items on the Consent Calendar
4.
UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON
John Dalessio suggested contacting one of the universities in the area to see if there is an interest in partnering on a grant application. He also suggested that any grant application include a proposal to create jobs by including a training program within the project scope.
Vince Frumkin stated that training staff to write grant applications is more effective than hiring consultants.
5.
DISCUSSION ON
There are two proposed alternatives that would meet the Division of Safety of Dam’s requirements for Cal-Am to address concerns at San Clemente Dam about dam safety during a maximum credible earthquake or during the probable maximum flood. These alternatives are dam buttressing (Cal-Am’s proposed project) and the Dam Removal and River Reroute Project (Reroute). Joyce said that California American Water (CAW) was concerned about potential liability from the Reroute project and that the Coastal Conservancy, Planning and Conservation League (PCL), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and CAW had been unable to resolve this issue. When the State budget crisis occurred in late 2008, contract work to evaluate this issue was halted. At about the same time, CAW chose to stop work on the Reroute alternative and move forward with the dam buttressing alternative.
A preliminary analysis by NMFS of the buttress alternative indicates that this alternative would receive a jeopardy opinion for impacts to steelhead [Essentially, a jeopardy opinion states that a proposed project would likely result in unacceptable harm to a listed species protected under the Endangered Species Act]. A jeopardy opinion must contain reasonable and prudent alternatives to protect the listed species, but those alternatives must be economically and technologically feasible.
Monica Hunter stated that PCL would like to see the public-private partnership on the Reroute alternative continue in order to keep the costs down for ratepayers and to enhance the environment. She said that there was a possibility that without the partnership continuing, the removal project would have to be completed without any public funds.
Concerning Los Padres Dam fish passage, Joyce said that CAW agreed to fund analysis and construction of improvements for downstream juvenile passage over the dam during spring flows. CAW will also investigate alternatives to improve upstream migration of adults and downstream migration of juveniles and kelts [adult spawners returning to the ocean].
Joyce said that the draft
steelhead recovery plan for
Joyce briefly described the 2006
Settlement Agreement between CAW and NMFS in which CAW agreed to fund projects
to mitigate impacts to steelhead from
6. STAFF REPORTS –
a.
b.
c. Mr. Hampson reported on the progress of a study by CSUMB to determine storage capacity at Los Padres Reservoir.
7.
ITEMS TO
BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDAS
Committee members scheduled July 16, 2009 for the next meeting and requested that the following items be placed on a future agenda:
a.
Continue
report on adult steelhead rearing program
b.
San
Clemente Dam update
c.
Potential
to buy out
8. ADJOURNMENT
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2009\20091116\InfoItems\23\item23_exh23e.doc