1.
Management Objectives
The
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (District) desires to maximize the
long-term production potential and protect the environmental quality of the Carmel River
and Seaside Groundwater Basins.
In addition, the District desires to maximize the amount of water that can be
diverted from the Carmel River Basin and injected into the Seaside Groundwater
Basin while complying with the
instream flow requirements recommended by the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) to protect the Carmel
River steelhead
population. To accomplish these goals, a water supply strategy and budget
for production within California American Water’s (CAW) Main
and Laguna Seca Subarea water distribution systems is reviewed quarterly to
determine the optimal strategy for operations, given the current hydrologic and
system conditions.
2.
Quarterly Water Supply Strategy: January - March 2010
On
December 3, 2009, staff from the District, CAW, the California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG), and NMFS met and discussed the proposed water supply
strategy and related topics for the remainder of December 2009 and the
January-March 2010 period. Currently, flow in the Carmel River
is unregulated, with both San Clemente Reservoir Los Padres Reservoir spilling,
and Los Padres Reservoir is temporarily at more than 100% of effective storage
capacity, i.e., 1790 vs. 1775 AF with the notch’s flashboard in place.
Flow in the Carmel
River is continuous to
the lagoon, and the lagoon mouth is open. Rainfall during Water Year 2010
to date at San Clemente Dam in the upper watershed has totaled 5.33 inches or
187% of the long-term average to date at this site, and 25% of the long-term
annual average of 21.3 inches. Further, unimpaired runoff at San Clemente
Dam for WY 2010 through November has totaled approximately 7,196 AF or about
396% of the long-term average to date for this site, and 10% of the long-term
annual average of 68,627 AF.
Carmel
River Basin Given these conditions, early rains in October 2009,
and early season runoff projections, it was agreed that “below normal
year” inflows would be initially assumed to assess CAW’s operations during the
January through March 2010 period. To meet customer demand, CAW
would operate its wells in the Lower
Carmel Valley
in a downstream-to-upstream sequence, as needed. For the quarterly
budget, it was agreed that CAW would produce no groundwater from its wells in
the Upper Carmel Valley
during January through March 2010. If sufficient flow in the Carmel River
at the District’s Don Juan Bridge gage in Garland Park, i.e., five consecutive
days of 20 or more cubic feet per second (cfs), continues to occur to justify
operations allowed under the less restrictive high-flow period, CAW could
operate these wells if needed. In addition, it is projected that CAW
would produce approximately 1,215, 1,198, and 1,368 AF of groundwater from its
wells in the Lower Carmel Valley during January, February, and March 2010, respectively.
Table 1 shows projected monthly
releases and diversions from Los Padres and San Clemente Reservoirs for the
October 2009 through March 2010 period.
It
was also agreed that releases from Los Padres Reservoir would be increased
during December, if necessary, so that flow in the Carmel River at both the
District’s Sleepy Hollow Weir gage below San Clemente Dam, and the District’s
gage at Highway 1 would be sufficient to allow Phase 1 ASR injection operations
in December, and to potentially provide minimal upstream passage flows for
steelhead. This increase would provide additional flow and habitat in the
lower Carmel River
for juvenile steelhead that have been released from the District’s Sleepy
Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility into the Carmel River
and Lagoon. District staff began releasing juveniles from the facility on
November 6, 2009 and finished on December 1, 2009.
Lastly,
it was assumed that 265, 330, and 370 AF of water would be diverted from the
Carmel River Basin and injected into the Seaside Groundwater Basin during the
during January, February, and March 2010, respectively. Because of the
uncertainty in predicting future rainfall and runoff amounts, this assumption
is subject to change.
Seaside Groundwater
Basin It was also agreed
that, subject to rainfall and runoff conditions in the Carmel
River, CAW would cease production from
the Coastal Subareas and allow the Seaside
Basin to naturally
recharge. It was also agreed that CAW would produce 11, 10, and 14 AF of
groundwater from its wells in the Laguna Seca Subarea of the Seaside Basin
for customers in the Ryan Ranch, Bishop, and Hidden Hills systems during
January, February, and March 2010, respectively. It is recognized that,
based on recent historical use, CAW’s actual production from the Laguna Seca
Subarea during this period will likely exceed the proposed monthly targets,
which are based on CAW’s allocation specified in the Seaside Basin Adjudication
Decision. For example, in the January through March 2009 period, CAW
produced 29, 21, and 26 AF from the Laguna Seca Subarea to meet customer demand
in the Ryan Ranch, Bishop, and Hidden Hills systems. In this context, the
production targets represent the maximum monthly production that should occur
so that CAW remains within its adjudicated allocation for the Laguna Seca
Subarea. Under the amended Seaside Basin Decision, CAW is allowed to use
production savings in the Coastal Subareas to offset over-production in the
Laguna Seca Subarea.
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2009\20091214\PubHrg\22\item22_exh22c.doc