EXHIBIT 1-B |
|||
DRAFT MINUTES Special Meeting
and Closed Session Board of
Directors Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District March 25, 2010 |
|||
The meeting was called to
order at 6:07 PM in the District Conference Room. |
|
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL |
|
Directors Present: Bob Brower, Vice Chair –
Division 5 Judi Lehman – Division 2 Kristi Markey – Division 3 David Pendergrass – Mayoral
Representative Directors Absent: None General Manager present: District Counsel present: David C.
Laredo |
|
|
|
The assembly recited the
Pledge of Allegiance. |
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
No comments were directed
to the Board during Oral Communications. |
|
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
On a motion by Director
Lehman and second of Director Potter, the Board approved item 1 and pulled
item 2 for separate consideration. The
motion was approved on a vote of 6 – 0.
Directors Brower, Doyle, Lehman, Markey, Pendergrass and Potter voted
in favor of the motion. Director
Edwards was absent for the vote. |
|
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|
Director Edwards arrived at
6:10 PM just as discussion began on this item. On a motion by Director
Markey and second of Director Potter, the Board voted unanimously to approve
the letter as presented with the following changes. (1) The response to Finding 6.7 should be
modified to state, “The MPWMD agrees with Finding 6.7, based on information
provided to date. The Regional Project
may provide the most benefit at the lowest cost, but additional cost analysis
should be completed.” No mention should be made of the environmental impacts,
because the project alternatives are very similar. (2) The General Manager was authorized to
add details that would support the response to Finding 6.2. Directors Brower, Doyle, Edwards, Lehman,
Markey, Pendergrass and Potter voted in favor of the motion. |
|
1. |
Consider
Approval of Response Letter to 2009 |
Approved. Director Potter suggested that District
staff contact Ron Holly, in the office of the Monterey County
Auditor/Controller regarding economic and cost issues related to the
projects. |
|
2. |
Consider Expenditure of Funds to Contract for
Professional Services to Evaluate Economic and Cost Allocation Issues
Associated with the Proposed Coastal Water and Regional Water Supply Projects |
|
|
|
|
The meeting was adjourned to
closed session at 6:20 PM. |
|
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION |
|
|
|
Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
(Gov. Code 54946.9 (a)) |
|
|
|
A. |
Application of California
American Water Company to the Public Utilities Commission Application No.
04-09-019 – Coastal Water Project |
|
|
B. |
Application of California
American Water Company to PUC Application No. 10-01-012—Mitigation Cost
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
|
The meeting was adjourned
at |
|
Adjourn |
___________________________________
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2010\20100419\ConsentCal\01\item1_exh1b.doc