EXHIBIT 1-A |
||||
DRAFT MINUTES Regular
Meeting Board of
Directors Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District April 19, 2010 |
||||
The meeting was called to
order at 7:03 PM in the District Conference Room. |
|
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL |
||
Directors Present: Bob Brower, Vice Chair –
Division 5 Judi Lehman – Division 2 Kristi Markey – Division 3 David Pendergrass – Mayoral
Representative Directors Absent:
None General Manager present: District Counsel present: David C.
Laredo |
|
|
||
The assembly recited the
Pledge of Allegiance. |
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE |
||
|
|
|
||
No comments were directed
to the Board during Oral Communications. |
|
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
CONSENT CALENDAR |
||
On a motion by Director
Edwards and second of Director Pendergrass, the Consent Calendar was
approved, except for item 3 that was pulled for separate consideration. The motion was approved unanimously on a
vote of 7 – 0. |
|
1. |
Consider Adoption of Minutes of the March 15, 2010
Regular Board Meeting and the Special Board Meetings of March 25, 2010 and
April 5, 2010 |
|
Approved. |
|
2. |
Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 2010-04 Declaring May as Water Awareness Month |
|
Chair Doyle deferred the
item to the May 17, 2010 Board meeting, and requested that the Legislative
Advocacy Committee review the item prior to May 17. |
|
3. |
Consider Adoption of Resolution No. 2010-05 Expressing Support for the Safe, Clean and
Reliable Drinking Water Supply Act of 2010 |
|
Approved. |
|
4. |
Consider Expenditure of Budgeted Funds to Install
Two |
|
Approved. |
|
5. |
Consider Expenditure of Budgeted Funds to Contract
for Temporary Help in the Water Demand Division |
|
Approved. |
|
6. |
Consider Approval of Treasurer's Report for February
2010 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
PRESENTATIONS |
||
An outline of Mr. Anthony’s
report is on file at the District office and can be viewed on the District’s
website. He noted that on slide 5 the
title should be corrected to read, “Five Year Average (2005-2009).” Mr. Anthony stated that over the past five
years, 88 percent of residential water use within the California-American
Water (Cal-Am) system has been in Tier 1 and Tier 2. |
|
7. |
Monthly Report from California American Water
General Manager, |
|
Henrietta Stern, Project
Manager, presented the report. An
outline of Ms. Stern’s presentation is on file at the District office and can
be viewed at the District’s website. In
response to a question from the Board, |
|
8. |
Update on Development of Water Supply Project
Alternatives Including Recycled Water |
|
|
|
9. |
Water Conservation Program Report |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT |
||
Mr. Fuerst stated that at a
future meeting, he would provide the Board with a chart illustrating water
use reductions achieved within the |
|
10. |
Status Report on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Manager Fuerst
reported that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) has scheduled evidentiary
hearings on the settlement and implementing agreements for May 10 through May
14, 2010 in |
|
11. |
Status Report and Discussion of CPUC
Proceedings Relating to |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ATTORNEY’S REPORT |
||
District Counsel Laredo
reported that the Board received status reports on all agenda items and
provided general direction. No
reportable action was taken. |
|
12. |
Report
on 5:PM Session of the Board |
|
|
|
|
Conference with Legal
Counsel – Existing Litigation (Gov. Code 54956.9 (a)) |
|
|
|
|
A. |
Application
of California American Water Company to the Public Utilities Commission
Application No. 04-09-019 – Coastal Water Project |
|
|
|
B. |
Application of California
American Water Company to PUC Application No. 10-01-012 –Mitigation Cost
Reimbursement |
|
|
|
C. |
Application of California
American Water Company regarding Reimbursement Balancing — CPUC Application No. 09-04-015 |
|
|
|
D. |
|
|
|
|
E. |
MPWMD v. State Water
Resources Control Board; Superior Court Case No. 1-10-CV-163328 |
|
|
|
F. |
|
|
|
|
G. |
|
|
|
|
H. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTORS’ REPORTS (INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS ON
TRIPS, CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS) |
||
No comments from the
Directors. |
|
13. |
Oral Report on Activities of County, Cities, Other
Agencies/Committees/ Associations |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
PUBLIC HEARINGS |
||
Director Edwards offered
a motion that was seconded by Director Pendergrass, to approve the staff
recommendation to Adopt Findings of Approval for Application #200912090CE,
and authorize issuance of MPWMD Permit #M12-04-L4 with the Conditions of
Approval. The motion was amended
with the consent of Director Edwards as follows. (1) Condition of Approval No. 13 – sentence
# 4 should be amended to read: Permittee
may apply in writing to the MPWMD board for extensions to the 120-day time
limit, each to be approved by the board upon a finding of good cause, and
each to be limited to a period of 120 days. (2) Condition of Approval No. 13
– add a sentence that reads: Applicant
shall adopt and implement CC&R's to require individual units to
reduce water use by 50% during periods that the CSD relies upon trucked water
due to interruption in desalination plant water production. (3)
Condition of Approval No. 13 – add to the end of sentence #5 that refers to
Rule 173 (trucked in water) the words:
"provided however, that the number of trucks used to transport
water shall be minimized to the extent practicable." The amended motion was
adopted unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0. Anthony Lombardo,
representing the applicant, addressed the Board during the public hearing on
this item. A summary of his comments
is on file at the District office and can be viewed on the District’s
website. In response to questions from
the Board he stated that the desalination plant would be constructed during
the first phase of the project. In the
event of a disruption in desalination plant production, mandatory water
conservation at the site would be required and in some circumstances businesses
and residents would be required to vacate the premises. Water could also be trucked to the site,
but the applicant preferred to not set a limit on the number of trucks that
could serve the project. He preferred
that Conditions of Approval for the application not be amended to limit the
amount of water available to the project, if the desalination component were
not operational. |
|
14. |
Consider
Application to Create Ocean View Community Services District Water
Distribution System -- APN 001-021-010 et al; Cannery Row, City of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Action Items were
submitted to the Board for consideration. |
|
ACTION ITEMS |
||
|
|
|
|
|
There was no discussion of
the Informational Items/Staff Reports. |
|
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
||
|
|
15. |
Letters Received |
|
|
|
16. |
Committee
Reports |
|
|
|
17. |
|
|
|
|
18. |
Water
Conservation Program Report |
|
|
|
19. |
Monthly
Allocation Report |
|
|
|
20. |
Monthly
|
|
|
|
21. |
Monthly
Water Supply Status Report |
|
|
|
22. |
Quarterly
Water Supply Project Status Report |
|
|
|
23. |
Quarterly
Irrigation Program and Riparian Projects Report |
|
|
|
24. |
|
|
|
|
25. |
Quarterly
Water Use Credit Transfer Status Report |
|
|
|
|
||
The meeting was adjourned to
closed session at 9:10 PM. |
|
ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION |
___________________________________
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2010\20100517\ConsentCal\01\item1_exh1a.doc