ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEM/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
24. |
WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM
REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2011 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
March
21, 2011
|
Budgeted:
|
N/A
|
||
|
|||||
From: |
|
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Gabriela
Ayala |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review:
N/A
|
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A
|
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
I. MANDATORY WATER CONSERVATION RETROFIT PROGRAM
District
Regulation XIV requires the retrofit of water fixtures upon Change of Ownership
to Ultra-Low Flush Toilets (ULF) (1.6 gallons-per-flush), 2.0
gallons-per-minute (gpm) Showerheads, and 2.2 gpm faucet aerators. Rain Sensors
are also required for all automatic Irrigation Systems. Property owners must certify the Site meets
the District’s efficiency requirements by submitting a Water Conservation
Certification Form (WCC). A Site
inspection to verify compliance is conducted when five years have passed since
a previous inspection.
Information
is obtained weekly from Realquest.com on properties transferring
ownership within the District. The information
is entered into the database and compared against the properties that have
submitted WCCs. Properties not in
compliance with Regulation XIV are identified.
Details on 81 property
transfers that occurred in February 2011 were entered into the database.
The District
received 49 WCCs between February 1 and February 28, 2011. Data on ownership, transfer date, and status
of conservation requirements were entered into the database.
In February, 58 inspections were performed to verify compliance with Rule 144 (Retrofit upon Change of Ownership or Use). Of
the 58 inspections performed, 46 (79%) were in compliance. Eleven
of the properties that passed inspection involved more than one visit to verify
compliance with all conservation requirements.
District inspectors are noting that a large percentage of toilets are being replaced with High Efficiency Toilets (HET). These retrofits are occurring as a result of remodels and new construction, and as the toilet of choice for Rule 144 compliance. State law mandates the sale and installation of HET by January 1, 2014, with a phase-in period that began in 2010.
Water savings
from retrofits triggered by Rule 144 that were verified in February 2011 are
estimated at 1.221 acre-feet
annually (AFA). Water savings from voluntary retrofits that
exceeded requirements (Ultra-Low Flush Toilets to HET), 17 toilets, is estimated at 0.416
AFA. Year-to-date estimated savings occurring as a result of Rule 144 is 2.858
AFA.
There was one Water Waste complaint reported by
the public, and staff made several verbal contacts in the field after observing
Water Waste. Follow up letters were sent
as needed to correct the Water Waste.
II.
WATER
DEMAND MANAGEMENT
District
staff processed and issued 52 Water Permits in February 2011. Four Water
Permits were issued using Water
Entitlements (Macomber, Pebble Beach Company, Griffin Estates, Quail Meadows,
Water West, etc). The remainder of the
Water Permits issued involved neither a debit to a Jurisdiction’s Allocation,
nor a debit to a Public Water Credit Account.
District Rule 23 requires a Water Permit application for all properties
that propose to Expand or modify water use on a Site, including New
Construction and Remodels.
All Water
Permit Applicants have received a disclaimer informing them of the Cease and
Desist Order against California American Water and the possibility that MPWMD will
be reporting Water Permits details to California American Water. Disclaimers will continue to be provided to
all permit recipients with property supplied by a California American Water
Distribution system.
District Rule 24-3-A allows the addition of a second bathroom to an
existing Single-Family Dwelling on a Single-Family Residential Site. Of the 52 Water Permits issued in February, 12 were issued under this provision.
B.
Permit
Compliance
District
staff completed 56 Water Permit
final inspections in February 2011. Thirteen
of the final inspections failed due to unpermitted fixtures. Of the 35 properties that were in compliance, 22 passed on the first visit. In
addition, 8 pre-inspections were
conducted in response to Water Permit applications received by the District.
District
staff prepares deed restrictions that are recorded on the property title to
provide notice of District Rules and Regulations, enforce Water Permit
conditions, and provide notice of public access to water records. In March 2001, the District Board of
Directors adopted a policy regarding the processing of deed restrictions. Specifically, an extensive quality control
process was put into place, and the District is now responsible for thoroughly
reviewing and recording these documents.
In the month of February, the District prepared 28 deed restrictions. Of the
52 Water Permits issued in February,
17 (40%) required deed restrictions. District staff provided deed restriction
Notary services for 58 Water Permit
Applicants.
Early in January 2011, funding
for the Rebate Program that was authorized by the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) in 2009 ran out! The
Rebate Program was temporarily halted while California American Water applied
for an additional $250,000 for Rebates from the CPUC. On February 8, 2011, the CPUC approved the
additional funding and MPWMD reinstated the Rebate Program for all applications
other than Lawn removal Rebates.
At the February 24, 2011, Board
meeting, Resolution 2011-04 was adopted lifting the suspension of the Lawn
Rebate program. Revised guidelines were considered by the Board but are not in
effect pending the adoption of a revised ordinance. The Draft Ordinance will be
considered by the Board at the March 21, 2011 meeting.
Participation
in the Rebate Program is detailed in the following charts. Table 1 indicates the program summary for California
American Water Company; Table 2
indicates the program summary for Seaside Municipal and Non-California American
Water users.
Prior to the January Board meeting, the District performed no pre-inspections and 7 final inspections for Lawn Rebates to
document removal of Lawn and replacement with low water using plants or permeable
surfaces or installation of Synthetic Turf. In the month of February, the
District prepared 18 deed restrictions
associated with the approval of Lawn removal.
Table 1 – Rebate Program Summary-California American Water Customers
Table
2 –Rebate Program Summary-Non-California American Water Customers