ITEM: |
DISCUSSION ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
24. |
WORKSHOP ON PROPOSAL BY
WATER PLUS FOR PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
July 18,
2011 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|
|
|||
From: |
Darby
Fuerst, |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|
||
|
|
|
|||
Prepared
By: |
Darby
Fuerst |
Cost
Estimate:
|
N/A
|
||
|
|||||
General
Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: Water Plus, a local ratepayer advocacy group, has requested that the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD or District) Board convene a public workshop to review Water Plus’ proposal that the District purchase Cal-Am, an investor owned public utility that is the largest water purveyor in the Monterey Peninsula area. A copy of the Water Plus’ proposal dated April 6, 2011 is included as Exhibit 24-A. Water Plus has also requested that the Board, following the workshop, conduct a District-wide advisory vote asking whether or not the voters within the District “support the purchase of Cal-Am by a public agency to ensure local ratepayer control over the cost and supply of water on the Monterey Peninsula”.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board should receive the presentation by the Water Plus representatives regarding the group’s proposal that MPWMD purchase Cal-Am, ask questions, allow public comment and questions, and following Board discussion, provide direction to staff. As a discussion item, no action is required at this time.
IMPACT ON STAFF RESOURCES: District staff contacted the Monterey County Elections Department to obtain an estimate of the cost to conduct a District-wide advisory vote in November 2011. The estimated cost to conduct a District-wide advisory vote in November 2011 would be approximately $85,000. This cost would be in addition to the $169,000 that has been budgeted to conduct Director elections in Divisions 3, 4, and 5 in November 2011.
EXHIBITS
24-A Water Plus Proposal to the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2011\20110718\DiscussionItem\24\item24.docx