|
||||
EXHIBIT 1-A DRAFT MINUTES Regular
Meeting Board of
Directors Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District September 19, 2011 |
||||
The meeting was called to
order at 7:00 p.m. in the District Conference Room. |
|
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL |
||
Directors Present: Robert S. Brower, Sr., Chair
-- Division 5 Dave Potter, Vice Chair –
Monterey County Board of Supervisors Brenda Lewis – Division 1 Judi Lehman – Division 2 Kristi Markey – Division 3 David Pendergrass – Mayoral
Representative Directors Absent: None General Manager present: David J.
Stoldt District Counsel present: David Laredo |
|
|
||
The assembly recited the
Pledge of Allegiance. |
|
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE |
||
|
|
|
||
The
following comments were directed to the Board during Oral
Communications. (1) Dick Heuer, former MPWMD Board member, requested that the
District investigate all “serious” water supply alternatives, including
feasibility of obtaining approval for construction of a dam on the Carmel
River. Mr. Heuer’s statement is on
file at the District office and can be viewed on the District’s website. (2)
Bill Cleary urged the Board to reconsider the New Los Padres Dam
project. He stated that desalination
is only viable in areas that have no fresh water to capture. (3)
Marc Beique opined that the District should enter into negotiations with
the National Marine Fisheries Service and the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB) to reconsider the New Los Padres Dam project. Mr. Beique’s statement is on file at the
District office and can be viewed on the District’s website. (4)
Roland Martin disagreed with the Board’s August 15, 2011 decision to not
analyze the WaterPlus proposal for public purchase of California American
Water (Cal-Am). He expressed support
for reconsideration of the New Los Padres Dam project. Mr. Martin’s statement is on file at the
District office and can be viewed on the District’s website. (5)
Lou Panetta requested that the Board evaluate the new Los Padres Dam
Project as a water supply alternative.
(6) George Riley,
representing Citizens for Public Water, encouraged Cal-Am to accelerate completion
of water audits. He proposed enactment
of Stage 2 conservation rules. In
addition, he stated that the SWRCB should process the Table 13 water rights
applications incrementally, in order to reduce the amount of water that must
be replaced by a new water supply project. (7) Buck Jones urged the
Board to negotiate with the National Marine Fisheries Service on
reconsideration of the New Los Padres Dam project. He stated that the community is waiting to
learn how the District proposes to augment the water supply. (8)
An email from Charles Page was
read into the record. Mr. Page
expressed support for opinions expressed by Dick Heuer in articles he
authored for the Monterey County Herald |
|
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS |
||
|
|
|
||
On a motion by Director
Potter and second of Director Doyle, the Consent Calendar items were adopted
unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0. |
|
CONSENT CALENDAR |
||
Adopted. |
|
1. |
Consider Adoption of Minutes of the August 15, 2011
Regular Board Meeting and August 25, 2011 Board Workshop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
2. |
Consider Adoption of Findings of Approval – Consider
Request for Variance from District
Rule 23-B-2-a Requiring a Separate Water Meter for Each Water User at 10
Vista Ladera, Carmel Valley (APN 187-111-027), Applicant:
Elaine Rankin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
3. |
Authorize Expenditure of Reimbursable Funds Obtained
from the California Department of Fish and Game to Contract with List
Engineering to Complete Final Design and Denise Duffy & Associates to
Complete Environmental Review and Permitting for the Sleepy Hollow Steelhead
Rearing Facility (SHSRF) Sediment Control and Intake Retrofit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
4. |
Consider Budgeted Expenditure for Pump Maintenance
at Sleepy Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
5. |
Consider Authorization of Sub-Grantee Agreements,
Consultant Contracts, and Purchase Orders for Projects to Update the
Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the Monterey Peninsula, Carmel
Bay and Southern Monterey Bay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
6. |
Consider Adoption of Administrative Committee Recommendation
that No Action be Taken on Establishment of an Annual Limit per Director on
Expenditures for Board Conference/Travel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
7. |
Ratify Amendments to Board Committee Assignments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
8. |
Appoint David J. Stoldt to the Position of Board
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adopted. |
|
9. |
Consider Adoption of Treasurer's Report for June
2011 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
PRESENTATIONS |
||
The report was presented by
Craig Anthony, General Manager of California American Water, Monterey
District. His report is on file at the
District office and can be viewed on the District’s website. He noted that water consumption continues
to decline over a twelve-month rolling period. Mr. Anthony advised the Board
that he discovered inconsistencies in the consumption information collected
by meter-read date and meter-bill date.
The consumption report presented that evening had been corrected. Inconsistencies were also discovered in
production estimates from the Begonia Iron Removal Plant, such that
production was incorrectly measured by approximately 1 acre-foot per
day. There are several probable
causes, and Cal-Am is working to correct the problem. |
|
10. |
Report from California-American Water re Progress on
Reducing Non-Revenue Water Use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephanie Pintar, Water
Demand Manager, presented the report.
A summary is on file at the District office and can be viewed on the
District’s website. In response to an
inquiry from the Board, Ms. Pintar said that she would investigate methods of
withdrawing water from the atmosphere as a source for outdoor irrigation. |
|
11. |
Water Conservation Program Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henrietta Stern, Project
Manager, presented the report. A
summary is on file at the District office and can be viewed on the District’s
website. |
|
12. |
Update on Development of Water Supply Project
Alternatives Including Recycled Water |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT |
||
David Stoldt, General
Manager, presented the report. An
outline of the presentation is on file at the District office and can be
viewed at the District’s website. Mr.
Stoldt reported that for the period ending August 31, 2011, California
American Water (Cal-Am) production from the Carmel River Basin was 1,267
acre-feet under the production target of 8,119 acre-feet established as a
result of State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order 2009-0060. Production from the Coastal Subareas of
the Seaside Basin was 262 acre-feet below the production target of 2,790
acre-feet. Production from the Laguna
Seca Subarea was 124 acre-feet over the production target of 218 acre-feet
established by the Seaside Groundwater Basin Adjudication. Production from the City of Sand City
Desalination plant was 257 acre-feet, which was 18 acre-feet below the
production target. Total Cal-Am
production from the Monterey Peninsula Water Resources System was 11,090
acre-feet, which is 1,423 acre-feet below the target of 12,513 acre-feet. |
|
13. |
Status Report on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board reviewed the
exhibits provided in the staff report and a revised version of Exhibit 14-C
presented at the meeting. No action
was taken. |
|
14. |
Report
on Follow-Up from Public Input Received at August 25, 2011 Board Workshop on
Alternative Water Supply Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATTORNEY’S REPORT |
||
District Counsel reported
that he provided status reports on items A through D listed on the Closed
Session. The Board provided general
direction, but no reportable action was taken. |
|
15. |
Report
on 5:30 pm Closed Session of the Board |
|
|
|
3. |
Conference with Legal
Counsel – Existing Litigation (Gov. Code 54956.9 (a)) |
|
|
|
|
A. |
Application
of California American Water Company to CPUC Application No.10-01-012 –Mitigation
Cost Reimbursement |
|
|
|
B. |
MPWMD v. State Water
Resources Control Board; Superior Court Case No. 1-10-CV-163328 |
|
|
|
C. |
California-American Water
Company v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management District. Monterey County
Superior Court Case No: M113336 |
|
|
|
D. |
Application of California American Water to the CPUC (Application No.
04-09-019) Coastal Water Project |
|
|
|
||
|
|
DIRECTORS’ REPORTS (INCLUDING AB 1234 REPORTS ON
TRIPS, CONFERENCE ATTENDANCE AND MEETINGS) |
||
Director Lehman reported
that owners of property located near the former City of Monterey wastewater
treatment plant, have contacted her about the desalination project proposed
to be constructed at that location. A
meeting will be organized so that MPWMD staff can respond to those questions
and provide current info on the proposed desalination plant. Director Brower reported that he spoke at a
town hall meeting sponsored by Jason Burnett.
He also gave a speech to the Carmel Valley Association. |
|
16. |
Oral Report on Activities of County, Cities, Other
Agencies/Committees/ Associations |
|
|
|
PUBLIC HEARINGS |
||
Director Markey offered
a motion that a hearing be scheduled for the Board to consider her appeal of
: (1) subordinate decisions
related to the appeal by Judy and David Beech, (2) subordinate decisions
related to the water distribution system applications by Flores and Pisenti,
and (3) as further outlined in the
August 5, 2011 email from Director Markey to Darby Fuerst, admitted as
Exhibit 17-A of the staff report on this item. The motion was approved
unanimously on a vote of 7 – 0. The following persons
addressed the Board during the public hearing on this item. (1)
David Beech, the applicant, requested that the Board consider the
substance of the original July 11, 2011 appeal at the next meeting, and also
reconsider the General Manager’s determination that the Flores and Pisenti
applications were complete. (2) Aaron Bierman, Hydrologist,
reported that results from the Pisenti and Flores well tests suggested that
there was no constructive interference between those wells. He noted that the Beech well is in
continuous operation. (3) Molly Erickson, Attorney for
David and Judith Beech, requested that the Board set a hearing in October
2011 to consider the Beech appeal, and the Flores and Pisenti application
completeness determinations Report of Ex Parte communications. Directors
Pendergrass, Doyle, Markey, Potter and Brower reported ex parte communications
with David and Judy Beech and their attorney, Molly Erickson. Directors Lehman and Lewis reported ex
parte communications with Molly Erickson. |
|
17. |
Consider Board Member Referral
Regarding General Manager Direction for Assessment of Flores Well #1 and
Pisenti Well #2 (APN 103-071-002 and 103-071-019, Respectively) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Potter exited the meeting at 9:15 pm,
following public hearing item 17. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Pendergrass
offered a motion that was seconded by Director Doyle, that the Board adopt
the second reading of Ordinance No. 149.
The motion was approved on a vote of 6 – 0. Directors Brower, Doyle, Lehman, Lewis,
Markey and Pendergrass voted in support of the motion. Director Potter was absent. No public
comment was directed to the Board during the public hearing on this item. |
|
18. |
Consider Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance
No. 149, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors Amending the Rebate Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a motion by Director
Doyle and second of Director Lewis, the Board adopted the October through
December 2011 Quarterly Water Supply Strategy and Budget on a vote of 6 –
0. Directors Brower, Doyle, Lehman,
Lewis, Markey and Pendergrass voted in support of the motion. Director Potter was absent. No public
comment was directed to the Board during the public hearing on this item. |
|
19. |
Consider Adoption of October through December 2011
Quarterly Water Supply Strategy and Budget |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACTION ITEMS |
||
Director Pendergrass
offered a motion to adopt Resolution 2011-12, modifying Rule 162. The motion was seconded by Direct Lewis and
approved on a vote of 6 – 0. Directors
Brower, Doyle, Lehman, Lewis, Markey and Pendergrass voted in support of the
motion. Director Potter was absent. The following comments were
received during the public comment period on this item. (1)
Larry Silver, representing the Sierra Club, requested that a notation be
added to Table XV-1 stating that the District is aware of the Cease and
Desist Order (SWRCB Order 2009-0060) and will assert its regulatory authority
to assure in a dry water year that there will be no shift of production from
the Carmel River attributable to losses in the Seaside Aquifer. Mr. Silver’s statement is on file at the
District office and on the District’s website. (2) Craig Anthony
requested that the Board adopt Resolution 2011-12 as presented. |
|
20. |
Consider Adoption of
Resolution 2011-12 Modifying Rule 162 – Regulatory Water Production Targets
for California American Water Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No discussion. |
|
21. |
Agenda Item 21 removed
from the agenda prior to publication. |
|
|
|
|
||
There was no discussion of
the Informational Items/Staff Reports. |
|
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
||
|
|
22. |
Letters Received |
|
|
|
23. |
Committee
Reports |
|
|
|
|
Carmel River Fishery Report for August 2011 |
|
|
|
24. |
Water Conservation Program Report for July 2011 |
|
|
|
25. |
Water
Conservation Report for August 2011 |
|
|
|
26. |
Monthly
Allocation Report |
|
|
|
27. |
Monthly
California American Water Production Report |
|
|
|
28. |
Monthly Water Supply Status Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The meeting was adjourned
at 9:40 pm. |
|
ADJOURNMENT |
_______________________________________
Arlene M. Tavani, Deputy Secretary to the Board
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2011\20111017\ConsentCal\01\item1_exh1a.docx