ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
|||||
|
||||||
23. |
SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER-QUALITY
MONITORING REPORT |
|||||
|
||||||
Meeting
Date: |
January 23, 2011 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
|||
|
||||||
From: |
David
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
Hydrologic Monitoring 2.6 |
|||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
2-6-1 G, and 2-6-2 D |
|||
|
||||||
Prepared
By: |
Joe Oliver/ |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
|||
|
Tom Lindberg |
|||||
|
||||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
||||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
||||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
||||||
SUMMARY: Water-quality results from the Fall 2011 sampling of the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District’s (District’s) monitor well networks in the Carmel Valley aquifer and the coastal areas of the Seaside Groundwater Basin are presented and briefly summarized below.
BACKGROUND: The District has maintained a groundwater-quality
monitoring program in the Carmel Valley Aquifer since 1981,
and in the
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Carmel
Valley Aquifer Monitor Wells - Results from the Fall 2011 sampling are
provided in Exhibit 23-A. Six monitor wells in the lower Carmel Valley
were sampled during Fall 2011, per the sampling
schedule described above. A seventh well
that is normally sampled in the Fall (16S/1E-13Md),
was not sampled in Fall 2011 or Fall 2010 because it was submerged under high
water in the Carmel River Lagoon during the sampling period. Another well that had been sampled during
this period was destroyed by flooding in March of 2011 when the river scoured
away the south end of the Carmel River State Beach parking lot. Three other wells in upper Carmel
Valley that are usually sampled in the Spring were
also sampled in Fall 2011. Due to other demands
for time, these three wells were not sampled in the Spring,
but were sampled in the Fall rather than missing a full year of sample
collection. The locations of the
sampling points are shown on the maps in Exhibits 23-C and 23-D. Review of these water-quality results
indicates that, in general, there are minor changes in overall water quality
compared to samples collected in 2010 (data originally reported in the August
16, 2010 and February 24, 2011 Board packets and provided here as a reference
in Exhibit 23-B).
Changes in water quality for specific wells are discussed below. Staff is particularly interested in tracking
indicators of potential seawater intrusion in the coastal portion of
Well 16S/1W-13Lc is the deepest in the array of three wells located State Parks property near the Carmel Area Wastewater District treatment plant at River Mile (RM) 0.65, currently the most proximate well to the ocean in Carmel Valley that is available for sampling. There is an increasing trend in Specific Electrical Conductance (SEC) and Chloride from 2008 to 2011, after a noticeable decline from 2006 to 2008 (Exhibit 23-E). Current levels are below peak levels observed at this location in Water Year 2001, however. Additional background on historical water-quality at the coastal monitor well sites can be found in District Technical Memorandum 90-04, Summary of Carmel Valley Groundwater-quality from Coastal Monitor Wells, which is available at the District office. Staff will continue to track future results for trends that might indicate significant changes in concentrations of these or other constituents in the coastal area of the aquifer.
Well 16S/1E-23E4, located 6.53 miles upstream
from the mouth of the Carmel River, shows a slight decline
in overall water quality in 2011 relative to 2010. A decline in water quality was noted at this
site in 2007, and in 2008 staff made improvements to the wellhead at
this site to reduce potential flooding along the roadside where this well is
located. Attempts have been made to improve
results through air-lifting and more extensive and rigorous pumping, but due to
the relatively small amount of available saturation below the water table at
this well, these efforts have not been successful. Staff will continue to
monitor the site to ensure the wellhead is secure from surface-water sources.
Well 16S/1E-23La, located 6.72 miles upstream from the river mouth, does not show a significant change in 2011 relative to 2010, but a graph of SEC and Chloride is included to track long-term trends as was described in the March 21, 2009 Board packet (Exhibit 23-F).
Well
16S/2E-33Q1, located 12.52 miles upstream
from the river mouth, is one of the three upper valley wells that is normally
sampled in the Spring, but was sampled in the Fall in
2011. This well was replaced with a new
monitor well approximately 100 feet away in August 2007 to accommodate a new
septic system on a neighboring parcel. The
concentration of Iron increased by two orders of magnitude and the
concentration of Manganese increased by one order of magnitude between 2010 and
2011 for unknown reasons. This well may
be a good candidate for more rigorous development through airlifting, and in
any case, staff will continue to watch for changes.
Seaside
Groundwater Basin Coastal Monitor Wells - Since 1990, the District has
been collecting water-quality samples from coastal monitor wells in the Seaside
Groundwater Basin, for the purposes of water-quality characterization and
sea-water intrusion monitoring. In 2009
District staff switched from air-lifting samples from wells in Seaside to
“micro-purging”, which is generally less destructive to the well and less
dangerous to the operator, but requires additional sampling at each well. In Fall 2011, 11
dedicated monitor wells at six different sites were sampled. One well (15S/1E-23Cb) that is part of the network
was not sampled in 2011 due to a temporary obstruction that prevented
collection of samples. Results of water-quality
sampling from 2011 and 2010 for the Seaside wells are provided in Exhibit
23-A and Exhibit 23-B, respectively. Because laboratory results for the Fall 2011 samples needed to be received and processed
earlier than in years prior to 2008 in order to complete an Annual Report to
the Seaside Groundwater Basin Watermaster, the Seaside wells were actually
sampled in July and August of 2011. The
locations of the Seaside monitor wells are shown on the map in Exhibit 23-G.
These results indicate little change from previous results over the
period of record for the existing wells, and that there is no indication of
sea-water intrusion in these wells that are completed in the two principal
aquifer units -- the Paso Robles Formation (i.e., shallower unit) and Santa
Margarita Sandstone (i.e., deeper unit) -- in this area of the Seaside
Groundwater Basin at the present time.
Results for most constituents in most of the wells were not
significantly different in 2011 relative to 2010, with few exceptions. Marked increases in Iron in wells 15S/1E-11Pb
and 15S/1E-12Fa were noted in 2010, but in 2011 the concentrations dropped
significantly in those wells. Staff will continue to track results for all
wells for trends that might indicate significant changes in the basin. A more complete historical summary of the
EXHIBITS
23-A Groundwater-quality Monitoring Results - Fall 2011
23-B Groundwater-quality Monitoring Results - Fall 2010
23-C Location of MPWMD Lower Carmel Valley Water-quality Monitoring Wells
23-D Location of MPWMD Upper Carmel Valley Water-quality Monitoring Wells
23-E Water-quality Results in Well 16S/1W-13Lc in Carmel Valley
23-F Water-quality Results in Well
16S/1E-23La in Carmel Valley
23-G Location of MPWMD Seaside Basin Water-quality Monitoring Wells
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2012\20120123\InfoItems\23\item23.docx