ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEM/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
21. |
WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM
REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
June 12, 2012 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Michael
Boles |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
I. MANDATORY WATER CONSERVATION RETROFIT PROGRAM
District
Regulation XIV requires the retrofit of water fixtures upon Change of Ownership
or Use with Ultra-Low Flush Toilets (ULF) (1.6 gallons-per-flush), 2.0
gallons-per-minute (gpm) Showerheads, 2.2 gpm faucet aerators, and Rain Sensors on all automatic
Irrigation Systems. Property owners must
certify the Site meets the District’s water efficiency standards by submitting
a Water Conservation Certification Form (WCC), and a Site inspection is often
conducted to verify compliance.
Information
is obtained weekly from Realquest.com on properties transferring
ownership within the District. The
information is entered into the database and compared against the properties
that have submitted WCCs. Details on 125 property transfers that occurred in
May 2012 were entered into the database.
The District
received 85 WCCs between May 1 and May 31, 2012.
Data on ownership, transfer date, and status of water efficiency
standard compliance were entered into the database.
In May, 123
inspections were performed to verify compliance with Rule 144 (Retrofit Upon Change of
Ownership or Use). Of the 123
inspections performed, 92 (75%)
were in compliance. Ten of the properties that passed inspection involved more than one
visit to verify compliance with all water efficiency standards.
District
inspectors have also been tracking toilet replacement with High Efficiency
Toilets (HET) in place of ULF toilets. These
retrofits are occurring in remodels and new construction, and are the toilet of
choice for Rule 144 compliance. State
law mandates the sale and installation of HET by January 1, 2014, with a
phase-in period that began in 2010. The
majority of toilets sold in California are HET.
Savings Estimate
Water savings
from ULF retrofits triggered by Rule 144 verified in May 2012 are estimated at 0.320 acre-feet annually (AFA).
Water savings from retrofits that exceeded requirements (i.e., Ultra-Low
Flush Toilets to HET) is estimated at 0.360
AFA (36 toilets). Year-to-date
estimated savings occurring as a result of toilet retrofits is 3.402
AFA.
There were two Water Waste complaints reported by
the public. Staff made several verbal contacts in the field after observing
Water Waste. Follow-up letters are sent
as needed to respond to Water Waste.
II.
WATER
DEMAND MANAGEMENT
District Rule
23 requires a Water Permit application for all properties that propose to
Expand or modify water use on a Site, including New Construction and
Remodels. District staff processed and issued
70 Water Permits in May 2012. Five Water Permits were issued using Water Entitlements (Macomber,
Pebble Beach Company, Griffin Estates, Quail Meadows, Water West, etc). No Water Permits involved a debit to a Public
Water Credit Account.
All Water
Permit Applicants have received a disclaimer informing them of the Cease and
Desist Order against California American Water and that MPWMD reports Water
Permit details to California American Water.
Disclaimers will continue to be provided to all Water Permit recipients
with property supplied by a California American Water Distribution System.
District Rule 24-3-A allows the addition of a second Bathroom in an
existing Single-Family Dwelling on a Single-Family Residential Site. Of the 70 Water Permits issued in May, five were issued under this provision.
B.
Permit
Compliance
District
staff completed 90 Water Permit
final inspections during May 2012. Twenty-seven of the final inspections
failed due to unpermitted fixtures. Of the 59
properties that were in compliance, 52 passed
on the first visit. In addition, four pre-inspections
were conducted in response to Water Permit applications received by the
District.
District
staff prepares deed restrictions that are recorded on the property title to
provide notice of District Rules and Regulations, enforce Water Permit
conditions, and provide notice of public access to water records. In March 2001, the District Board of
Directors adopted a policy regarding the processing of deed restrictions. In the month of May, the District prepared 38 deed restrictions. Of the 70
Water Permits issued in May, 19 (27%) required deed
restrictions. District staff provided
deed restriction Notary services for 22 Water
Permit Applicants.
Rebate funding for customers of California
American Water was depleted on May 18, 2011. The Cal-Am Rebate Program will
continue when additional funding is available. The Rebate Program for
non-California American Water Company customers, including Seaside Municipal
Water District customers, will continue until funding is depleted.
There were no Rebate applications
received for California American Water customers in May 2012.
One Rebate application was
received and approved for Non-California American Water customers in May 2012.
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2012\20120612\InfoItems\21\item21.docx