ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEM/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
20. |
WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM
REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
July 16, 2012 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Michael
Boles |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
I. MANDATORY WATER CONSERVATION RETROFIT PROGRAM
District
Regulation XIV requires the retrofit of water fixtures upon Change of Ownership
or Use with Ultra-Low Flush Toilets (ULF) (1.6 gallons-per-flush), 2.0
gallons-per-minute (gpm) Showerheads, 2.2 gpm faucet aerators, and Rain Sensors on all automatic
Irrigation Systems. Property owners must
certify the Site meets the District’s water efficiency standards by submitting
a Water Conservation Certification Form (WCC), and a Site inspection is often
conducted to verify compliance.
Information
is obtained weekly from Realquest.com on properties transferring
ownership within the District. The
information is entered into the database and compared against the properties
that have submitted WCCs. Details on 159 property transfers that occurred in
June 2012 were entered into the database.
The District
received 59 WCCs between June 1 and June 30, 2012.
Data on ownership, transfer date, and status of water efficiency
standard compliance were entered into the database.
In June, 98
inspections were performed to verify compliance with Rule 144 (Retrofit Upon Change of
Ownership or Use). Of the 98
inspections performed, 66 (67%)
were in compliance. Four of the properties that passed inspection involved more than
one visit to verify compliance with all water efficiency standards.
District
inspectors have also been tracking toilet replacement with High Efficiency
Toilets (HET) in place of ULF toilets. These
retrofits are occurring in remodels and new construction, and are the toilet of
choice for Rule 144 compliance. State
law mandates the sale and installation of HET by January 1, 2014, with a
phase-in period that began in 2010. The
majority of toilets sold in California are HET.
Savings Estimate
Water savings
from ULF retrofits triggered by Rule 144 verified in June 2012 are estimated at
0.329 acre-feet annually (AFA).
Water savings from retrofits that exceeded requirements (i.e., Ultra-Low
Flush Toilets to HET) is estimated at 0.300
AFA (30 toilets). Year-to-date
estimated savings occurring as a result of toilet retrofits is 4.031
AFA.
There were three Water Waste complaints reported
by the public. Staff made several verbal contacts in the field after observing
Water Waste. Follow-up letters are sent
as needed to respond to Water Waste.
II.
WATER
DEMAND MANAGEMENT
District Rule
23 requires a Water Permit application for all properties that propose to
Expand or modify water use on a Site, including New Construction and
Remodels. District staff processed and
issued 51 Water Permits in June 2012.
Six Water Permits were issued using Water
Entitlements (Macomber, Pebble Beach Company, Griffin
Estates, Quail Meadows, Water West, etc).
No Water Permits involved a debit to a Public Water Credit Account.
All Water
Permit Applicants have received a disclaimer informing them of the Cease and
Desist Order against California American Water and that MPWMD reports Water
Permit details to California American Water.
Disclaimers will continue to be provided to all Water Permit recipients
with property supplied by a California American Water Distribution System.
District Rule 24-3-A allows the addition of a second Bathroom in an
existing Single-Family Dwelling on a Single-Family Residential Site. Of the 51 Water Permits issued in June, two were issued under this provision.
B.
Permit
Compliance
District
staff completed 56 Water Permit
final inspections during June 2012. Eight of the final inspections failed
due to unpermitted fixtures. Of the 47
properties that were in compliance, 45 passed
on the first visit. In addition, nine pre-inspections
were conducted in response to Water Permit applications received by the
District.
District
staff prepares deed restrictions that are recorded on the property title to
provide notice of District Rules and Regulations, enforce Water Permit
conditions, and provide notice of public access to water records. In March 2001, the District Board of
Directors adopted a policy regarding the processing of deed restrictions. In the month of June, the District prepared 38 deed restrictions. Of the 51
Water Permits issued in June, 19 (37%) required deed
restrictions. District staff provided
deed restriction Notary services for 50 Water
Permit Applicants.
Rebate funding for customers of California
American Water was depleted on May 18, 2011. The Cal-Am Rebate Program will
continue when additional funding is available. The Rebate Program for
non-California American Water Company customers, including Seaside Municipal
Water District customers, will continue until funding is depleted.
There were two Rebate applications
received and denied for California American Water customers in June 2012.
There were no Rebate applications
received for Non-California American Water customers in June 2012.
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2012\20120716\InfoItems\20\item20.docx