ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
21. |
SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER-QUALITY
MONITORING REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
December 10, 2012 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
Hydrologic Monitoring 2.6 |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
2-6-1 G, and 2-6-2 D |
||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Joe Oliver/ |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
Tom Lindberg |
||||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: Water-quality results from the Fall 2012 sampling of the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District’s (District’s) monitor well networks in the Carmel Valley aquifer and the coastal areas of the Seaside Groundwater Basin are presented and briefly summarized below.
BACKGROUND: The District has maintained a groundwater-quality
monitoring program in the Carmel Valley Aquifer since 1981,
and in the
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Carmel
Valley Aquifer Monitor Wells - Results from the Fall 2012 sampling are
provided in Exhibit 21-A. Six monitor wells in the lower Carmel Valley
were sampled during Fall 2012, per the sampling
schedule described above. A seventh well
that is normally sampled in the Fall (16S/1E-13Md), was not sampled in Fall
2012, Fall 2011 or Fall 2010 because it was submerged under high water in the
Carmel River Lagoon during the sampling period.
Another nearby well that had been sampled during this period (16S/1W-14Jg)
was destroyed by flooding in March 2011 when the river scoured away the south
end of the Carmel River State Beach parking lot. The locations of the lower valley sampling points are shown on the
map in Exhibit 21-C. Review of these water-quality results
indicates that, in general, there are minor changes in overall water quality
compared to samples collected in 2011 (data originally reported in the January 23,
2012 Board packet and provided here as a reference in Exhibit 21-B). It should be noted that
the Fall 2011 data in Exhibit 21-B include three
wells in the upper Carmel Valley Aquifer that were not sampled during the
normal collection time in Spring 2011. Changes
in water quality for specific wells are discussed below. Staff is particularly interested in tracking
indicators of potential seawater intrusion in the coastal portion of
Well 16S/1W-13Lc is the deepest in the array of three wells located State Parks property near the Carmel Area Wastewater District treatment plant at River Mile (RM) 0.65, currently the most proximate well to the ocean in Carmel Valley that is available for sampling. There was an increasing trend in Specific Electrical Conductance (SEC) and Chloride from 2008 to 2011, after a noticeable decline from 2006 to 2008, but in 2012 both constituents were lower than in 2011 (Exhibit 21-D). Current levels are below peak levels observed at this location in Water Year 2001, however. Additional background on historical water-quality at the coastal monitor well sites can be found in District Technical Memorandum 90-04, Summary of Carmel Valley Groundwater-quality from Coastal Monitor Wells, which is available at the District office. Staff will continue to track future results for trends that might indicate significant changes in concentrations of these or other constituents in the coastal area of the aquifer.
Results for well 16S/1E-23E4, located 6.53
miles upstream from the mouth of the Carmel River, show a slight decline in
overall water quality in 2012 relative to 2011.
A decline in water quality was noted at this site in 2007, and in 2008 staff
made improvements to the wellhead at this site to reduce potential
flooding along the roadside where this well is located. Attempts have been made to improve results
through air-lifting and more extensive and rigorous pumping, but due to the
relatively small amount of available saturation below the water table at this
well, these efforts have had limited success. Staff will continue to monitor
the site to ensure the wellhead is secure from surface-water sources.
Results for well 16S/1E-23La, located 6.72 miles upstream from the river mouth, show an increase in both SEC and Chloride in 2012 relative to 2011. In fact, both SEC and Chloride were higher in 2012 than any year since 2006 (Exhibit 21-E). Other constituents were not significantly changed from last year.
Seaside Groundwater Basin Coastal Monitor Wells - Since 1990, the District has been collecting water-quality samples from coastal monitor wells in the Seaside Groundwater Basin, for the purposes of water-quality characterization and sea-water intrusion monitoring. In 2009 District staff switched from air-lifting samples from wells in Seaside to “micro-purging”, which is generally less destructive to the well and less dangerous to the operator, but requires additional sampling time at each well. In Fall 2012, 11 dedicated monitor wells at six different sites were sampled. One well (15S/1E-23Cb) that is part of the network was not sampled in 2012 due to a temporary obstruction that prevented collection of samples. Results of water-quality sampling from 2012 and 2011 for the Seaside wells are provided in Exhibit 21-A and Exhibit 21-B, respectively. Because laboratory results for the Fall 2012 samples needed to be received and processed earlier than in years prior to 2008 in order to complete an Annual Report to the Watermaster, six Seaside wells were actually sampled in June and July 2012, while the remaining six were sampled in late September 2012. The locations of the Seaside monitor wells are shown on the map in Exhibit 21-F. These wells are completed in the two principal aquifer units -- the Paso Robles Formation (i.e., shallower unit) and Santa Margarita Sandstone (i.e., deeper unit) – of the Seaside Groundwater Basin. These results indicate little change from previous results over the period of record for the existing wells, and that there is no indication of sea-water intrusion at the locations and depths of these monitor wells at the present time. Results for most constituents in most of the wells were not significantly different in 2012 relative to 2011, with few exceptions. Marked increases in Iron concentration in wells 15S/1E-11Pb and 15S/1E-12Fa were noted in 2010, but in 2011 the concentrations dropped significantly in those wells. In 2012, the Iron concentration in well 15S/1E-11Pb had dropped below practical quantifiable limits, but in well 15S/1E-12Fa it had increased significantly relative to results from 2011. Staff will continue to track results for all wells for trends that might indicate significant changes in the basin. A more complete historical summary of the Seaside Basin coastal groundwater-quality data is contained in District Technical Memorandum 97-02 Seaside Basin Coastal Monitor Wells: Ground Water-quality Monitoring Results, 1990-1996, which is available at the District office.
EXHIBITS
21-A Groundwater-quality Monitoring Results - Fall 2012
21-B Groundwater-quality Monitoring Results - Fall 2011
21-C Location of MPWMD Lower Carmel Valley Water-quality Monitoring Wells
21-D Water-quality Results in Well 16S/1W-13Lc in Carmel Valley
21-E Water-quality Results in Well 16S/1E-23La in Carmel Valley
21-F Location of MPWMD Seaside Basin
Water-quality Monitoring Wells
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2012\20121210\InfoItems\21\item21.docx