1. Management Objectives
The
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (District) desires to maximize the
long-term production potential and protect the environmental quality of the
2. Quarterly Water Supply Strategy: April - June 2013
On
March 12, 2013, staff from the District, Cal-Am, the California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG), NMFS, and met and discussed the proposed water supply
strategy and related topics for the April - June 2013 period. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
was unable to attend, but staff from the State Water resources Control Board’s,
Division of Water Rights participated by conference call for the first
time. Currently, flow in the Carmel
River is unregulated and Los Padres Reservoir (LPR) is spilling. LPR is currently at ~103% of maximum
effective storage capacity, i.e., 1,731 AF that occurs with the Los Padres Dam
(LPD) spillway’s notch flashboard removed, or 101% of the 1,775 AF of storage
capacity achieved when the notch’s flashboard is back in place, later this
spring. The LPD notch is open to
hypothetically enhance steelhead smolt emigration,
but since this is such a dry water year, the flashboard may be replaced into
the notch earlier than normal during the coming Quarter. This is done in order to maximize any
potential storage that can be gained each year, so that it can be allocated to
sustaining minimum flows in the river over the summer and fall. Flow in the Carmel River is continuous to
the lagoon, but the lagoon mouth is predominantly closed, though it is
breaching periodically at the prior low point that resulted from prior
mechanical breaches that were conducted by Monterey County in December 2012 to
prevent the lagoon from inundating nearby homes. Rainfall during Water Year (WY) 2013 to date
at San Clemente Dam in the upper watershed has totaled 13.53 inches or 87% of
the long-term average to date at this site, and 63% of the long-term annual
average of 21.44 inches. Further,
unimpaired runoff at San Clemente Dam for WY 2013 through February has totaled
approximately 22,628 AF or about 62% of the long-term average to date for this
site, and 33% of the long-term annual average of 68,756 AF, making this a
“Below Normal” Water Year Type, to date.
Carmel River Basin Given these
conditions, and runoff to date, it was agreed that “Below Normal” year inflows
would be initially assumed to assess Cal-Am’s
operations during the April through June 2013 period. To meet customer demand, Cal-Am would
operate its wells in the Lower Carmel Valley in a downstream-to-upstream
sequence, as needed. For the quarterly
budget, it was agreed that Cal-Am would attempt to produce no groundwater from
its wells in the Upper Carmel Valley during April through June 2013. If sufficient flow in the
Lastly, it was assumed that 260 and 145 AF of water would be
diverted from the Carmel River Basin and injected into the Seaside Groundwater
Basin during April and May 2013, respectively.
Because of the uncertainty in predicting future rainfall and runoff
amounts, this assumption is subject to change.
Seaside
Groundwater Basin It was also agreed that, subject to
rainfall and runoff conditions in the Carmel River, Cal-Am would reinitiate
production at 250 AF per month from their wells in the Coastal Subareas, for
May and June 2013, in addition to the planned 25 AF per month of production
from the Sand City Desalination Plant, so as to achieve maximum utilization of
the native water available in the basin under the Seaside Basin Adjudication
Decision and in compliance with SWRCB Orders 95-10 and 2002-0060. For this budget period, projected Coastal
Subarea production could vary from the values shown, if flows increase
sufficiently to reinitiate Water Project 1 and 2 (ASR) injection
operations. These operations may require
some minor production from the Seaside wells in April to pressurize the
delivery system and enable ASR injection.
It was also agreed that only 10, 14, and 16 AF of groundwater would be
budgeted from Cal-Am’s wells in the Laguna Seca Subarea of the Seaside Basin for customers in the Ryan
Ranch, Bishop, and Hidden Hills systems during April, May and June 2013,
respectively. It is recognized that,
based on recent historical use, Cal-Am’s actual
production from the Laguna Seca Subarea during this
period will likely exceed the proposed monthly targets, which are based on Cal-Am’s allocation specified in the Seaside Basin Adjudication
Decision. For example, in the April
through June 2012 period, Cal-Am produced 15, 20, and 19 AF from the Laguna Seca Subarea to meet customer demand in the Ryan Ranch,
Bishop, and Hidden Hills systems. In
this context, the production targets represent the maximum monthly production
that should occur so that Cal-Am remains within its adjudicated allocation for
the Laguna Seca Subarea. Under the amended Seaside Basin Adjudication
Decision, Cal-Am is allowed to use production savings in the Coastal Subareas
to offset over-production in the Laguna Seca Subarea.
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2013\20130318\PubHrng\14\item14_exh14c.docx