ITEM: |
GENERAL
MANAGER’S REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
13. |
UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENT OF
WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
November 18, 2013 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: N/A |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
DISCUSSION:
SWRCB: On
November 12, 2013 the District General Manager and General Counsel met with
representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the
Attorney General’s office, California American Water (Cal-Am), the Regional
Water Authority, Sierra Club, attorney for water rights holders, and the Pebble
Beach Company (Parties to the lawsuit over the Cease and Desist Order (CDO))
and held initial discussions about the process for petitioning for a
modification of the CDO under section 1832 of the California Water Code. The parties agreed to work with SWRCB
enforcement staff in 2014 and consider formal action for modification in
2015. The Parties also agreed to meet
regularly and open up the group to additional interests in mid- to late-2014.
On October 16, 2013 the General Manager, General Counsel, and Stephanie
Pintar met with Barbara Evoy, John O’Hagan, and James Kassel of the SWRCB
enforcement staff in Lathrop to discuss resolving the mixed-use metering issue. The District proposed that the SWRCB allow
the water use factor methodology to be used to determine whether a proposed use
would intensify use of water. Further, in the case of determining whether
a new meter should be set, no discount or factor of safety should be applied,
so that we would be consistent with existing uses. We believe that the interpretation of the CDO
can be honored, but the April 2012 interpretative guidelines significantly
simplified. The goal is to let an
existing parcel split, subdivide, add a new address, change the type of
business, go to mixed-use, and so forth, so long as the water used at that site
will not be increased based on assumed factors. No one can presume that
the factors will precisely predict use, but since the advent of all of the
Peninsula’s conservation practices and improvements in devices, the factors now
tend to overstate water use and actual use will likely be lower – a factor of
safety is built in. We have urged the SWRCB to allow the District to use
its methodology to determine whether a building applicant or a business owner
has a plan that will not intensify water use and then direct Cal-Am to set the
meter. SWRCB staff indicated last week
that a draft letter proposal is being circulated within the SWRCB. The General Manager spoke to the SWRCB
General Counsel, the SWRCB Chair Felicia Marcus, on this issue last week and
has meetings set with two other board members on the topic in the next week.
Desalination Facility
(A.12-04-019): The District finalized the draft legislation
and one-page summary sheet for the Water Rate Relief Bonds and forwarded to
Senator Monning’s staff for them to begin working with the Legislative
Counsel’s office to convert into a Senate Bill.
The General Manager has made 8 public presentations on the status of the
water supply projects and the use of the Water Rate Relief Bond financing and
its benefits to ratepayers. He will
continue to make 4 to 8 more presentations in coming weeks.
Groundwater Replenishment
(GWR): District staff has been meeting with MRWPCA
staff and consultants every other Friday, tracking project progress. CEQA work
and source water feasibility studies continue to proceed.
With respect to GWR, the District has been developing a form of water
purchase agreement that minimizes costs to ratepayers and will provide a secure
financing source. Working with MRWPCA
the District will build a long term financing plan that will be used to secure
low cost State Revolving Fund loans and other grant monies. The District also is negotiating a consulting
contract with Schaff and Wheeler work with the District and MRWPCA on source
water rights issues.
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
(ASR): The District has reached agreement with the
City of Seaside for the size and shape of the easement for the Santa Margarita
site and will enter into a reimbursement agreement for an appraisal. Staff will be directing General Counsel to
modify proposed agreements for the City of Seaside which will enable FORA to
approve final plans. This could lead to
completion of the backflush pond, undergrounding of pipes, paving, and
landscaping in 2014.
Alternative Desalination
Project: An oral report was provided at the October 21st
Board meeting. General Manager Stoldt
has a meeting set with DeepWater representatives this week.
On November 4th, the District was formally served with a
summons advising the District that it is being sued by Water Plus over its
cost-sharing agreement with DeepWater Desal and its participation in the
project environmental and permitting work.
Local Water Projects: The
District General Counsel has drafted a grant agreement that is being finalized
by staff. This should enable actual
award of monies to the Airport District and the City of Pacific Grove before
the end of the calendar year. District
staff met with the Airport and its Army Corp contractor to discuss their
project.
MPWSP Governance Committee: Please
see agenda item 2 on the Consent Calendar.
Ordinance 152 Citizen’s Panel: The
panel will meet November 19th and discuss progress on the adopted
FY2013-14 capital improvement plan and expenditures of the Water Supply Charge.
EXHIBIT
None
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2013\20131118\ConsentClndr\GMreport\13\item13.docx