ITEM: |
PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
|||||
18. |
CONSIDER
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 157, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING RULE 11
(DEFINITIONS), REVISING RULE 23-A-1-I REGARDING WATER MEASURING DEVICE
REQUIREMENTS AND AMENDING THE TITLE OF RULE 144 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
November 18, 2013 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Stephanie
Pintar |
Cost
Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: Completed |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: On November 6, 2013, the Water Demand Committee referred this ordinance to the Board. |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: This
ordinance does not meet the “project” definition according to CEQA Guideline
§15378 (b) (5) |
|||||
SUMMARY: Draft Ordinance No. 157 (Exhibit 18-A) adds a definition to Rule 11 for the term “Capacity Fee” and clarifies Rule 23-A-1-i, Action on Application for a Water Permit to Connect to or Modify an Existing Water Distribution System.
During consideration of the first reading of Ordinance No. 156 in October 2013, the Board discussed clarification of Rule 23-A-1-i, the paragraph in Rule 23 that references the District’s metering requirements. For reference, the current Rule 23 is attached as Exhibit 18-B and a list of definitions included in this ordinance is attached as Exhibit 18-C. Draft Ordinance No. 157 replaces the existing Rule 23-A-1-i with clearer policy and implements a specific variance process for unique metering situations.
Draft Ordinance No. 157 amends the definition of the term “Connection Charge” to provide a historical context. In addition, an identical definition is added for the term “Capacity Fee.” The ordinance then globally replaces the former with the latter to avoid confusion with the connection charge proposed by California American Water in its 2013 General Rate Case (A.13-07-002).
Finally, Ordinance No. 157 amends
the title of Rule 144 - Retrofit Upon Change of
Ownership or Use, to reflect that the rule also applies to Expansions of Use.
The proposed ordinance is not a project under CEQA and is therefore not
subject to CEQA evaluation. CEQA Guideline §15378 (a) defines a “project” as an
action that has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in
the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment. The proposed amendments to Rules 11 and 23 do not contemplate
approval of any project, and therefore the ordinance does not meet the
“project” definition according to CEQA Guideline §15378 (b) (5) which states:
“Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not
result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.”
RECOMMENDATION: The Board should receive public comment and approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 157.
EXHIBITS
18-A Draft Ordinance No. 157
18-B Rule 23
18-C Definitions
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2013\20131118\PubHrngs\18\item18.docx