ITEM: |
PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
|||||
17. |
CONSIDER
DISTRIBUTION OF LOCAL PROJECT GRANT FUNDS TO CITY OF PACIFIC GROVE |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
February 18, 2015 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
Local Water
Projects |
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item
No.: 1-10-1 |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
Not to exceed $100,000 |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: At its February 10, 2015 meeting the Water Supply Planning Committee recommended approval of the grant to Pacific Grove by a vote of 3 to 0 |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: At
its June meeting the District Board adopted a budget that included expenditure
of up to $200,000 of the Water Supply Charge for development expenses for local
water projects. The program requires
matching by the local project sponsor.
Each jurisdiction and other interested parties (potential Project
Sponsors) were solicited to submit an application.
At its July meeting the Board authorized distribution of the grant/loan
application for FY2014-15. Applications
were due by October 1. Two applications were received. The application from the
City of Pacific Grove was initially rejected because Directors expressed
concern that the Pure Water Monterey groundwater replenishment project
negotiations for a definitive agreement are at a critical stage and it would
not be appropriate at this time to financially support a potential reduction in
wastewater flows from Pacific Grove to the Regional Treatment Plant.
The Committee did, however, restate its support for local projects like
Pacific Grove’s that free-up potable water supply and directed staff and the
City to revisit its proposal to focus on the stormwater
components. The City has done so with a
revised application that is attached as Exhibit 17-A. At its February 10, 2015 meeting the Water
Supply Planning Committee recommended approval of this revised request.
RECOMMENDATION: The
Water Supply Planning Committee recommends approval of the grant to the City of
Pacific Grove.
DISCUSSION:
Project eligibility, requirements that staff and Water Supply Planning
Committee will consider are as follows:
Project Purpose: Direct water supply benefit includes the
development of a new water supply that may be used to offset the existing
unlawful diversions of the California American Water Company from the Carmel
River, as affected by the 2009 Cease and Desist Order imposed by the State
Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”), or may result in a new additional
supply of water that may serve future needs of the Monterey Peninsula.
Ancillary benefits may include, but are not
limited to, the following:
·
Water
supply reliability, conservation, and efficiency of use;
·
Water
quality improvement – river, ocean, groundwater;
·
Recycling
or reuse of wastewater consistent with SWRCB Recycled Water Policy;
·
Reduction
of non-point source pollution, or point source discharge consistent with SWRCB
Ocean Plan;
·
Reduction
of carbon-based emissions consistent with California AB32 goals;
·
Storm
Water capture and reuse consistent with California ASBS policy goals;
·
Groundwater
recharge;
·
Flood
management and protection of property; and
·
Environmental
mitigation, fisheries protection, or habitat restoration;
District Goals: Does the proposed
project provide water to meet additional District goals? District goals include the following four
goals:
·
Can the
Project provide water supply to the District for drought/rationing reserve
(i.e. water that is not supplied to a beneficial use immediately upon project
completion) and if so, how much?
·
Can the
Project provide water supply to the District for potential future reallocation
to the jurisdictions (i.e. water that is not supplied to a beneficial use
immediately upon project completion) and if so, how much?
·
Can the
project be run in a manner that would provide surplus production that could be
“banked” into the Seaside Groundwater Basin utilizing the District’s Aquifer
Storage and Recovery project?
·
Are
there multiple benefits to the region or the State as described above?
Evaluation:
Projects are evaluated by staff and recommendations made to the
Committee based upon the following “Merit Factors.”
·
Application
contains basic information requested
·
Project
produces new water supply
·
Amount
of new supply
·
Ancillary
benefits demonstrated and determined to be of value to community
·
District
goals identified above, are met by project.
·
Feasibility
of Project has been demonstrated.
·
Project
Schedule is well defined and feasible.
·
Project
Financing is well defined and contingencies examined and identified.
·
Annual
Cost of Water is well defined and determined by the District to be consistent
with alternate water supply projects, with consideration for ancillary
benefits.
·
Project
status with respect to permits, consultants, and land appear to be consistent
with successful project completion.
EXHIBIT
17-A City of Pacific Grove REVISED Local Water Project
Grant/Loan Application
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2015\20150218\PublicHrngs\17\Item
17.docx