ITEM: |
CONSENT CALENDAR |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
6. |
CONSIDER
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 2015-24 IN SUPPORT OF FILING AN APPLICATION TO THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, STEELHEAD REPORT AND RESTORATION CARD
PROGRAM |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Meeting
Date: |
December 14, 2015 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
|||||||
|
||||||||||
From: |
David
Stoldt, |
Program/
|
N/A |
|||||||
|
General
Manager |
Line
Item No.: |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||
Prepared
By: |
Kevan
Urquhart |
Cost
Estimate: |
N/A |
|||||||
|
||||||||||
General
Counsel Review: N/A |
||||||||||
Committee
Recommendation: The Administrative
Committee reviewed this item on December 7, 2015 and recommended approval. |
||||||||||
CEQA
Compliance: N/A |
||||||||||
SUMMARY: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW) Steelhead Report and Restoration Card (SHRCC) program is soliciting proposals for projects that monitor
anadromous steelhead in the coastal watersheds of California. The Monterey Peninsula Water Management
District (MPWMD or District) was previously co-funded by the CDFW Fisheries
Restoration Grants Program in 2012 to install and operate a dual
frequency identification sonar (DIDSON) imaging system to count adult steelhead
immigrating into the Carmel River watershed.
Applications for grant funds to help support continued operation of the
DIDSON were due to CDFW on or before November 13, 2015, and submitted on
November 12, 2015. Authorization from
the District Board is required to enter into a contract with CDFW (see Exhibit 6-A,
Resolution 2015-24).
RECOMMENDATION: If this item is
approved as part of the Consent Calendar, the Board will adopt Resolution 2015-24
in support of applying for grant funding from the CDFW SHRRC Program and will
authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract with the CDFW to receive
grant funds.
BACKGROUND:
In late 2015, CDFW acquired additional funding to expand grants made
from this dedicated fund account, and issued a second Proposal Solicitation
Notice for 2015 on October 19, 2015, with a due date of November 13, 2015. The Fisheries Program Supervisor responded to
this solicitation with a proposal to fund the cost of supplies and labor by
Water Resources Assistants to review the incoming data sets and develop the
annual counts of steelhead passing the monitoring station. For the second solicitation of 2015, MD-Monitoring
Status and Trends was one of the focus areas to be funded. Statewide applications for funds are in the
process of being judged on a competitive basis, with a final decision scheduled
for January 2016.
Reinstallation, Operation and Maintenance of a Sonic Fish
Counting Device in the Lower Carmel River. Steelhead
migrating upstream were historically counted at the San Clemente Dam
fish ladder at RM 18.6 and Los Padres Dam at RM 24.8. San Clemente Dam was removed this year,
precluding any further data collection there by prior methods. Additionally, an unknown but potentially
significant number of fish (estimated at more than 40% of the annual run) may
spawn in the lower river below the San Clemente Dam ladder and were not historically
counted as part of the annual run. A DIDSON
device is installed annually at a location in the lower three to eight miles of
the Carmel River to count immigrating
adult steelhead in the Lower Carmel River. This DIDSON installation
allows the District to enumerate the entire Carmel River steelhead run. Ongoing monitoring with this technology
can: a) prove whether or not there is a
significant amount of spawning occurring below Los Padres Dam, b) conclusively
document increased utilization of and spawning in the Lower Carmel River that
likely resulted from decades of the District’s riparian and stream restoration
projects, and c) document progress towards Endangered Species Act Recovery
goals.
IMPACT
ON FISCAL AND STAFF RESOURCES: No cash funds are proposed to be used by MPWMD
as a local match in grant applications.
However, several District staff are involved on an ongoing basis in annual
reinstallation, operation and maintenance of the DIDSON; as well as data
review, report writing, and managing grant contracts if the District is
successful in obtaining grants. The
costs for their time will be documented and reported for credit as the local
funding match. In addition, the District
may be eligible for reimbursement of up to 15% of the requested amount of grant
funding for administrative overhead.
EXHIBIT
6-A MPWMD Board Resolution 2015-24
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2015\20151214\ConsentClndr\06\Item6.docx