ITEM: |
CONSENT CALENDAR |
||||
|
|||||
8. |
RECEIVE AND FILE 2014-2015 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE
MPWMD MITIGATION PROGRAM |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
May 16, 2016 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/
|
N/A |
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
|
Cost
Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance:
N/A for report |
|||||
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Board should receive and review the Executive Summary for the 2014-2015
Mitigation Program Annual Report. If adopted along with the Consent
Calendar, the full report will incorporate any comments if needed and be
finalized so it can be distributed to interested agencies and posted to the
District’s website for public availability.
The Executive Summary provides an overview of the major accomplishments,
conclusions and/or recommendations. The
Executive Summary for the 2014-2015 Mitigation Program Annual Report is
attached as Exhibit 8-A.
The annual report primarily
reviews Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD or District)
activities that address the effects of community water use on the Carmel River
environment in Fiscal Year (FY) 2014-2015, defined as the 12-month period from
July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015.
Please note that hydrologic data and well production reporting data are described
for Water Year 2015 (October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015). Use of the Water Year format for these data
is consistent with reporting required by the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB) and Seaside Basin Watermaster.
This report is the 24th annual
report since the Mitigation Program Plan was adopted by the District Board in
November 1990, as part of the certification of the MPWMD Water Allocation
Environmental Impact Report (Water Allocation EIR), in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Copies of the full annual report will be provided to the Board members
upon request, and will be provided to the required resource agencies and other
interested parties as needed.
BACKGROUND:
On November 5, 1990, the Water Allocation EIR was certified by the MPWMD
Board. The Board also adopted findings,
and passed a resolution that set Option V as the new water allocation
limit. Option V resulted in a production
limit of 16,744 acre-feet per year (AFY) for the California American Water
(Cal-Am) system. Subsequently, this
amount was increased to 17,641 AFY based on new supply provided by the
completion of the Paralta Well in Seaside in 1993, and other changes since
1993. On October 20, 2009, the SWRCB
issued Order 2009-0060, the “Cease and Desist Order” (CDO) against Cal-Am. The CDO refers to the 1995 SWRCB Order 95-10,
noting that compliance with Order 95-10 had not yet been achieved. The CDO institutes a series of cutbacks to Cal-Am
production from the Carmel River system and prohibits new or intensified
connections in the Cal-Am main system.
The CDO reduced the upper limit of diversion from the Carmel River
previously set by Order 95-10 at 11,285 AFY to 10,429 AFY beginning in WY 2010,
with additional annual reductions thereafter.
The Water Allocation EIR
determined that even though Option V is the least damaging alternative of the
five options analyzed, production at this level still may result in
significant, adverse, environmental impacts that must be mitigated. Thus, the CEQA Findings adopted by the Board
in 1990 included a "Five-Year Mitigation Program for Option V" and
several general mitigation measures. The
Five-Year Mitigation Program formally began in July 1991 with the new fiscal
year and was slated to run until June 30, 1996.
Following public hearings in May 1996 and District Board review of draft
reports through September 1996, the Five-Year Evaluation Report for the
1991-1996 comprehensive program, as well as an Implementation Plan for FY 1997
through FY 2001, were finalized in October 1996. In its July 1995 Order WR 95-10, the SWRCB
ordered Cal-Am to carry out any aspect of the “Five-Year Mitigation Program for
Option V” that the District does not continue after June 1996. To date, as part of its annual budget
approval process, the District Board has voted to continue the program. The Mitigation Program presently accounts for
a significant portion of the District budget in terms of revenue and
expenditures.
For projects or programs that
entail significant adverse impacts, CEQA requires that an annual report be
prepared documenting: (1) the actual
mitigation activities that were carried out by the lead agency, and (2) the
effectiveness of the mitigation activities, as measured via a monitoring
program. The 2014-2015 Water Allocation
Mitigation Report responds to these requirements.
The 2014-2015 report reviews
District activities relating to water supply and demand, followed by mitigation
measures for specific environmental impacts.
It also provides a summary of costs for the Mitigation Program as well
as references. For each topic, the
mitigation measure adopted as part of the certified Allocation EIR is briefly
described, followed by a summary of activities carried out in FY 2014-2015 that
relate to the topic. Monitoring results,
where applicable, are then presented.
Finally, a summary of conclusions, and/or recommendations are provided,
where pertinent. The annual report
format has been refined from earlier years to aid the efficiency of preparing
and reviewing the document.
Mitigation
Program costs for FY 2014-2015 totaled approximately $2.30 million including
direct personnel expenses, operating costs, project expenditures, capital
equipment, and fixed asset purchases. The annual cost of mitigation
efforts varies because several mitigation measures are weather dependent.
Expenditures in FY 2014-2015 were $0.11 million less than the prior fiscal year
due to decreases in Mitigation Program costs. However, the overall costs
have remained fairly constant (average of $3 million per year) for last five
years. In the past, expenditures had trended upward due to expenditures
for the Aquifer Storage Recovery (ASR) Project. ASR Project costs are no
longer captured under Mitigation Program Costs.
FY 2012-2013 expenditures were $2.22 million; and FY 2013-2014
expenditures were $2.41 million.
During
FY 2014-2015, revenues totaled $2.43 million including mitigation program
revenues, grant receipts, investment income and miscellaneous revenues.
The Mitigation Program Fund Balance as of June 30, 2015 was $461,432.
EXHIBIT
8-A Executive
Summary for 2014-2015 Annual Mitigation Report
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2016\20160516\ConsentClndr\08\Item-8.docx