ITEM: |
DISCUSSION
ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
18. |
REVIEW PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR
2016-2017 MPWMD BUDGET AND RESOLUTION
2016-10 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
May 16, 2016 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Suresh
Prasad |
Cost
Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: The proposed budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-2017 is attached as Exhibit 18-C (separate document). While preparing the proposed budget, District staff was mindful of the continued economic conditions as well as the current status of the District’s three main funding sources (Mitigation Program revenue, Property Tax Revenue, and Water Supply Charge). This budget assumes continuation of the adopted annual Water Supply Charge and continued collection of the Mitigation Program revenue from ratepayers of California American Water in FY 2016-2017. This budget does not include collection of user fee revenue from California American Water ratepayers. This budget also takes into account District’s existing Rabobank ASR loan debt obligation. Proposed expenditures and revenues each total $11,810,100, which is a decrease of 12% for expenditures and revenues from the amount budgeted in FY 2015-2016. A more detailed justification of the proposed budget is provided in the transmittal letter which is part of the budget document. This proposed budget does not include the use of reserves to balance the proposed budget. The FY 2016-2017 Budget also assumes payment of $230,000 towards debt service (interest and principal) for the Rabobank ASR Loan. The budget document has been presented in same format as in prior years.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board discuss the proposed FY 2016-2017 budget and give general direction to staff to prepare the final budget document for adoption at the June 20th Board Meeting. No formal action is required at this meeting.
In the
past, District budgets had been balanced by use of previously accumulated
reserves. At the District’s strategic
planning session on September 29, 2004, staff recommended that a balanced
budget be prepared for FY 2005-2006 using a combination of revenue and
expenditure adjustments to eliminate the use of reserve funds. At the January 19, 2005 budget workshop, the
Board adopted an eight-part strategy for balancing the FY 2005-2006 Budget. In being mindful of the 2005 Board adopted
strategy, every effort was made to balance this proposed budget without the use
of reserves. This proposed FY 2016-2017
Budget was balanced without the use of reserves to maintain all of District’s
programs and services. This budget
assumes the continued collection of the annual Water Supply Charge and
California American Water Mitigation Program revenues. This budget does not include user fee
revenue.
18-A Draft Resolution No. 2016-10
18-B Draft Copy Certification
18-C Draft Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Proposed Budget (separate document)
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2016\20160516\DiscussionItems\18\Item-18.docx