ITEM: |
ACTION ITEMS |
||||
|
|||||
15. |
APPROVE RESPONSE TO
2015-2016 MONTEREY COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
September 19, 2016
|
Budgeted:
|
N/A
|
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
|
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval:
N/A
|
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A
|
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
SUMMARY: The Monterey County Civil
Grand Jury submitted a Final Report to MRWPCA entitled “Striving for
Sustainability” (Exhibit 15-B) on June
24, 2016. The report focused on groundwater and how important this resource is
to every citizen in the county. The Grand Jury requested the District to
respond affirmatively or negatively to their Findings and Recommendations.
With respect to each finding, the Board shall indicate one of the
following:
1)
That the
Board/Agency/You agree with the finding; or
2)
That the
Board/Agency/You disagree wholly or partially with the finding, in which case
the Board must specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall
include in the response an explanation of the reasons for the disagreement.
With respect to each recommendation, the Board of Directors must report
one of the following actions:
1)
That the
recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented
action;
2)
That the
recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the
future, with a timeframe for implementation;
3)
That the
recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and
parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be
prepared for discussion by the Board (this timeframe not to exceed six months
from the date of publication); or
4)
The
recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not
reasonable, with an explanation.
District staff reviewed the report and recommends the response attached
as Exhibit 15-A.
The District understands that civil grand juries have no enforcement
authority, although we certainly know that they perform an important community
function. The reports the Grand Jury generate are in response to citizen
inquiries. The individuals who make up the Grand Jury are local citizens
appointed by a judge.
The report constitutes a Final Report for purposes of Penal Code section 933.
Pursuant to that section, the District Board must submit comments on the report
to within ninety (90) days following its transmittal, which is October 12th.
Pursuant to the Grand Jury’s letter the Board is responsible for Finding
Nos. F1 through F16, and Recommendation Nos. R1 through R16.
RECOMMENDATION: The
General Manager recommends the Board discuss the proposed response letter
attached as Exhibit 15-A, recommend changes, if any, and authorize the Chair to
sign on behalf of the Board.
EXHIBITS
15-A Draft Proposed Response to Civil Grand Jury
Report
15-B 2015-16
Monterey County Civil Grand Jury Final Report “Striving for Sustainability”
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2016\20160919\ActionItems\15\Item-15.docx