ITEM: |
CONSENT CALENDAR |
||||
|
|||||
6. |
CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION
OF EXPENDITURE FOR FINANCIAL CONSULTANT TO EVALUATE
EXPANSION OF PURE WATER MONTEREY PROJECT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
January 24, 2018 |
Budgeted: |
No |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item
No.: |
35-03-786010 |
||
|
|||||
|
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
Not to exceed $50,000 |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee reviewed this item on January 17, 2018 and recommended approval. |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: Action does not constitute a project as
defined by the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15378. |
|||||
SUMMARY: On November 13, 2017 Board approve the expenditure of up to $360,000 in support of qualifying an expansion of Pure Water Monterey for approval by the CPUC on or about April 2018.
Recall that when the Pure Water Monterey project was first approved, it was required to meet 9 tests:
(i)
MRWPCA
has approved the GWR Project pursuant to a certified
Final EIR;
(ii)
The
status of required permits is consistent with the published project schedule;
(iii)
There
is sufficient legal certainty as to agreements or other determinations in place
to secure delivery of source water(s)
(iv) The weight of the evidence in the record does not show that the California Department of Health or the Regional Water Quality Control Board will decline to accept or approve the GWR extraction or GWR treatment and injection processes, respectively;
(v)
The
GWR Project is on schedule, as verified by a report issued by an engineer
licensed in California, to be operable;
(vi)
Preliminary
design for the GWR Project is at least at the 10% level, represented by a basis
of design report;
(vii)
A
GWR Project funding plan is in place;
(viii) California American Water, MPWMD, and MRWPCA have agreed on a WPA whose terms are just and reasonable; and
(ix) The revenue requirement for the combination of the GWR Project and the desalination project is just and reasonable when compared to the revenue requirement for a larger desalination project alone.
In order to gain greater certainty and make representative strides toward each of the 9 criteria by an April hearing date, it was estimated that $480,000 will need to be expended. Under Amendment 2 of the Cost Sharing Agreement the District would fund up to $360,000 of such costs. The source of the funds will be reimbursements for the Phase 1 Pure Water Monterey pre-construction costs, which were outside the District’s adopted FY 2017-18 budget.
This item will authorize work to be done in support of criteria (ix) and (vii), above.
It is possible that an expansion
of Pure Water Monterey will be deemed unnecessary or infeasible and the costs
will be stranded.
RECOMMENDATION:
The General
Manager recommends the Board approve the expenditure of up to $50,000 for a financial consultant to evaluate
expansion of the Pure Water Monterey project.
EXHIBIT
None
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2018\20180124\ConsentClndr\06\Item-6.docx