ITEM: |
INFORMATIONAL
ITEMS/STAFF REPORTS |
||||
|
|||||
26. |
QUARTERLY CARMEL RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM REPORT |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
January 24, 2018 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
Dave Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
Thomas Christensen and |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
Larry Hampson |
|
|
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: This
action does not constitute a project as defined by the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15378. |
|||||
IRRIGATION
OF RIPARIAN VEGETATION: The
supplemental watering of riparian restoration plantings resumed for the summer
season in 2017 at six Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (District)
riparian habitat restoration sites. The
following irrigation systems were in use May through November: deDampierre, Trail and Saddle Club, Begonia, Schulte, Dow,
and Schulte Bridge.
Water Use in Acre-Feet (AF)
(preliminary values subject
to revision)
April - June 2017 1.39
MONITORING
OF RIPARIAN VEGETATION: Starting in June 2017, staff recorded monthly
observations of canopy vigor on target willow and cottonwood trees to provide
an indication of plant water stress and corresponding soil moisture
levels. Four locations (Rancho Cañada,
San Carlos, Valley Hills, and Schulte) are monitored monthly for canopy ratings
based on a scale from one to ten. This scale evaluates characteristics such as
yellowing leaves and percentages of defoliation (see scale on Exhibit 26-A). A total of 12 willows and 12 cottonwoods at
these locations provide a data set of established and planted sample trees that
are representative of trees in the Carmel River riparian corridor. Combined
with monthly readings from the District’s array of monitoring wells and pumping
records for large-capacity Carmel Valley wells in the California American Water
service area, the District’s monitoring provides insight into the status of
soil moisture through the riparian corridor.
Monitoring
results for the 2017 season show that riparian vegetation was below threshold moisture
stress levels. This was due to the fact
that the Carmel River flowed all year to the lagoon and provided plenty of
water for established plants along the riparian corridor. The graph in Exhibit
26-A
shows average canopy ratings for willows and cottonwoods in selected
restoration sites in lower Carmel Valley.
The graph in Exhibit 26-B shows
impacts to water table elevations.
The
types of monitoring measurements made during June - October 2017 are as
follows:
Monitoring Measurement
Canopy
ratings (See
Exhibit 26-A for trends.)
Groundwater
levels (monitoring wells) (See Exhibit
26-B for
trends.)
Groundwater pumping (production
wells)
OTHER
TASKS PERFORMED SINCE THE OCTOBER 2017 QUARTERLY REPORT:
1.
Carmel
River Mitigation Plantings: During
the months of November and December, District staff have been planting riparian trees along the
Carmel River to mitigate for in channel Vegetation Management activities where
downed trees or standing vegetation created blockages in the active channel.
This work is carried out with permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
NOAA Fisheries, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish
and Wildlife (CDFW), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The
goal of the vegetation management activities is to reduce the risk of
streambank erosion along riverfront properties where vegetation encroachment
could potentially divert river flows into streambanks during high
flow periods.
2.
Instream Flow Incremental Method Study: MPWMD fisheries staff collected additional data from
the river channel about fish presence and effects of winter storms, which
filled many of the deep pools with sand.
The District’s Consultant (Normandeau Inc.) will test whether these changes significantly
affect steelhead habitat. A final IFIM
report and memo on changes in channel conditions should be available in the 4th
quarter of 2017.
3.
Los Padres Dam Long-Term Plan: The first
Technical Review Committee (TRC) meeting was held on August 3, 2017. For a dredging operation, the Consultant team
recommended against using steep canyon areas upstream of the reservoir for placing
dredged material and instead determined that all material presently within the
reservoir could be placed on Cal-Am property downstream of the existing
dam. It was estimated that an average of
16,000 to 34,000 cubic yards of material per year accumulates in the reservoir
(about 32,000 to 68,000 tons).
For a reservoir expansion alternative, options include
installing a temporary rubber dam or permanent dam raise, a new dam downstream
or a combination. For a dam removal alternative, phased
(multi-year) removal by elevation was deemed not feasible because an operating
spillway would be required after each removal.
Partial or full removal of the embankment is feasible if the reservoir
is to be abandoned.
The Consultant will refine
alternatives before convening the second TRC meeting in January, which will
focus on evaluating alternatives.
4.
Los Padres Dam Fish Passage Study: The
Consultant team presented a preliminary ranking of passage alternatives showing
a retrofit or replacement of the existing trap and truck operation as the
highest ranked alternative for upstream passage. The highest ranked alternatives for
downstream passage were a floating surface collector placed at the head or reservoir or at about
mid-reservoir to capture downstream migrating fish and transport them to the
dam. The Technical Review Committee was asked to comment on evaluation criteria
and rankings.
5.
Stormwater Resource Plan
(SRP):
Staff participated in the first Technical Advisory Committee meeting to develop
the Stormwater Resource Plan and provided requested information to the
consultant team developing the plan. The
focus of the SRP is to identify sources of stormwater throughout the Monterey
Peninsula that can be recycled as new water supply.
EXHIBITS
26-A Average
Willow and Cottonwood Canopy Rating
26-B Depth to
Groundwater
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2018\20180124\InfoItems\26\Item-26.docx