ITEM:
|
CONSENT
CALENDAR
|
|
4.
|
RECEIVE AND FILE FOURTH QUARTER
FINANCIAL ACTIVITY REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-2019
|
|
Meeting
Date:
|
October 21, 2019
|
Budgeted:
|
N/A
|
|
From:
|
David J.
Stoldt,
|
Program/
|
N/A
|
|
General
Manager
|
Line Item No.:
|
|
|
Prepared
By:
|
Suresh
Prasad
|
Cost
Estimate:
|
N/A
|
|
General Counsel Review: N/A
|
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee reviewed this
item on October 14, 2019 and recommended approval.
|
CEQA Compliance: This action does not constitute a project
as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section
15378.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY: The fourth quarter of Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019
concluded on June 30, 2019. Table
comparing budgeted and actual year-to-date revenues and expenditures for the
period are included as Exhibit 4-A. Exhibits
4-B and 4-C
presents the same information in bar graph format. The following comments summarize District
staff's observations:
REVENUES
The revenue table
compares amounts received through the third quarter and conclusion of FY 2018-2019
to the amounts budgeted for that same time-period. Total revenues collected were $14,296,787, or
85.1% of the budgeted amount of $16,803,000.
Variances within the individual revenue categories are described below:
- Water Supply Charge revenues were $3,401,940, or 100.1%
of the budget for the period. This
was in line with the expected budgeted figure.
- Property tax revenues were $2,054,056, or 105.3% of
the budget for the period. This was
higher than anticipated due to increase in property values resulting in
higher property tax allocation for the District.
- User fee revenues were $4,862,354, or about 108.1% of
the amount budgeted. The User Fee
was implemented from April 19, 2017. This was the second full year of User
Fee collections, and thus the budgeted figures are not in line with the
actual collections since the District did not have historical figures on
collections.
- Connection Charge revenues were $591,241, or 131.4%
of the budget for the period. Actual
collection was higher than anticipated budgeted figure as the forecasted
figures are based on estimated number of customers pulling permits. There was more connection charge received
than budgeted for the fiscal year.
- Permit Fees revenues were $251,850, or 109.0% of the
budget for the period. Actual
collection was higher than anticipated budgeted figure as the forecasted
figures are based on estimated number of customers pulling permits. There was more permit fees received than
budgeted for the fiscal year.
- Interest revenues were $292,581, or 162.5% of the
budget for the period. Actual
interest received was higher than budgeted due to increase in fund balance
and investment strategies.
- Reimbursements of $1,153,911, or 65.9% of the
budget. This is based on actual
spending and collection of reimbursement project funds. The actual collections were lower tha the expected budgeted figure.
- Grant revenue of 1,675,836, or 78.0% of the
budget. This was slightly lower due
to grant reimbursement projects being deferred and continued to next fiscal
year.
- The Other revenue category totaled $13,018 or about 25.5%
of the budgeted amount. This
category includes reimbursement revenues from legal and other miscellaneous
services. Actual collections were
lower than anticipated.
- The Reserves category totaled $0 or about 0.00% of
the budgeted amount. This category
includes potential use of reserves and the water supply carry forward
balance during the fiscal year for which adjustments were not made due to
actual revenues coming in higher than the expenditures.
EXPENDITURES
Expenditure
activity as depicted on the expenditure table is similar to patterns seen in
past fiscal years. Total expenditures of
$11,208,122 were about 66.7% of the budgeted amount of $16,803,000 for the period. Variances within the individual expenditure
categories are described below:
- Personnel costs of $3,789,751 were about 97.8% of the
budget. This was in line with the anticipated budget.
- Expenditures for supplies and services were $1,205,997,
or about 90.0% of the budgeted amount. This was lower than the anticipated
budget primarily due to the professional fees and legal expenses coming in
lower than the expected budgeted numbers.
- Fixed assets purchases of $425,271 represented around
77.5% of the budgeted amount as some of the purchases were deferred to
next quarter.
- Funds spent for project expenditures were $5,437,138,
or approximately 63.1% of the amount budgeted for the period. This is due to most projects spending being
deferred to next fiscal year.
- Debt Service included costs of $128,961, or 56.1% of
the budget for the period. Debt
service is paid semi-annually, in December and June. Principal paid on the debt was recorded
against the outstanding liability.
- Contingencies/Other expenditures $0, or 0% of the
budgeted amount. This was due to
the contingency budget not spent during this fiscal year.
- Reserve expenditures of $0, or 0% of the budgeted
amount. This was due to the adjustments
made at the conclusion of the fiscal year.
EXHIBITS
4-A Revenue and Expenditure Table
4-B Revenue
Graph
4-C Expenditure Graph
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2019\20191021\ConsentClndr\04\Item-4.docx