ITEM: |
ACTION ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
13. |
CONSIDER DENIAL OF REQUEST FROM CITY OF MONTEREY RE ALLOCATION FOR
2000 AND 2600 GARDEN ROAD, MONTEREY |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
May 18, 2020 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: The Water Demand Committee met May 7, 2020 and voted to deny the request 3-0. |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: Action does not constitute a project as
defined by the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15378. |
|||||
SUMMARY:
At its March 5,
2020 Water Demand Committee meeting, the Committee
discussed a letter dated February 18, 2020 from the City of Monterey requesting
a water allocation for affordable housing projects on Garden Road. The allocation would come from the District
Reserve initially,
but shifted to a future
District allocation for jurisdictional use based on housing needs.
The allocation would allow 31
additional 100% affordable units at 2000 Garden Road and 35 additional 100%
affordable units at 2600 Garden Road.
The day prior to the March Committee
meeting, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) submitted an email
expressing its concerns with such an approach.
The email simply clouded any decision to release water at this time,
prior to having discussion with SWRCB staff once total Peninsula needs are
identified. At its April 2, 2020 meeting
the Water Demand Committee took up this matter with Director Hoffmann initially
making a motion for the committee to defer action until after staff and the
SWRCB meet and come to some accommodation regarding use of the District
Reserve. However, Director Edwards then
suggested staff bring the item back in May and Director Hoffmann agreed. Director Edwards then turned that suggestion
into a motion and it passed 3-0.
At this time,
staff is recommending denial of the request because of the SWRCB email still
being unresolved, as well as the policy for the use of the District Reserve is
under separate discussion (see agenda Item 14.)
Water Demand Committee concurred with a 3-0 vote to recommend denial by
the Board at its May 18th meeting.
The Committee supports the
projects, but believes it is appropriate to wait until a Peninsula-wide
solution can be brought forward. District
staff is still planning to visit with SWRCB staff about water for housing needs
under the Cease and Desist Order (CDO) once the various jurisdictional needs
are known, as an outcome of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) process. The General Manager spoke with the SWRCB
attorney assigned to the CDO on April 30, 2020 to begin the process of seeking
accommodation for near-term housing needs under the existing CDO.
RECOMMENDATION: The Committee recommends the
Board deny the Citys request at this time and direct
staff to interact with SWRCB on Peninsula-wide housing needs and the CDO,
pursuant to the TAC process.
EXHIBIT
None
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2020\20200518\ActionItems\13\Item-13.docx