ITEM: |
ACTION ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
34. |
BOARD REVIEW AND ACTION RELATED TO RECENT CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO
MONTEREY ONE WATER |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
June 15, 2020 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: Action does not constitute a project as
defined by the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15378. |
|||||
Also on May 1, 2020 the same date
the District letter was forwarded to M1W, Director Hoffmann independently authored
and distributed his own letter to the M1W Board. His letter is attached as Exhibit 34-A.
A M1W board member, Tom Moore, then responded to Mr. Hoffmann’s
letter. (Mr. Moore’s response and a copy
of a related email were distributed to the MPWMD District Board on Monday May 4th.
Note: highlighting in the letter was done by M1W board member Moore.) District Chair Edwards and Vice-Chair Byrne instructed
District General Counsel Laredo and General Manager Stoldt to draft and send a
letter to the M1W Board to clarify that Director Hoffmann did not speak on
behalf of the Board pursuant to limits set by MPWMD District Meeting Rule 6. The May 6, 2020 letter is attached as Exhibit
34-B.
Mr. Hoffmann’s
letter represented that it forwarded by him in his capacity as an MPWMD Board
member. This deviates from the
requirements of District Meeting Rule 6 which authorizes only the Chair, or
another Board member designated by the Chair, or the General Manager to be the
spokesperson for the District. District’s
Meeting Rule 6 is attached as Exhibit 34-C.
The Chair now requests this circumstance
be presented to the full District Board for discussion and action, as may be desired.
Under this Action Item, the Board may
review and consider action as appropriate related to (1) the May 1, 2020 communication
sent by Director Hoffmann to board members of M1W, (2) the May 6, 2020 letter
sent jointly by General Manager Stoldt and General Counsel Laredo District at
the direction of the District Chair and Vice-Chair, (3) circumstances
referenced in any of these communications, and (4) consequences that may result
from these communications.
Options under discussion or action
are for the Board to (i) take no action, (ii) provide additional direction to
the General Manager and General Counsel, and/or (iii) provide direction to
Director Hoffmann.
Robert’s Rules of Order, Revised,
provides guidance under the topic of The Right of a Deliberative Assembly to
Punish its Members: “A deliberative assembly has the inherent right to make and
enforce its own laws and punish an offender...”
Robert’s Rules the following option, among others:
Censure: Censure is an
expression of strong disapproval or harsh criticism. It can be adopted without
formal disciplinary procedures.
For the sale of completeness,
Robert’s Rules of Order, Revised, also references addition modes of punishment
of members, but these consequences are not available to a member of the
District Board for the reasons noted:
Fine: A member may be
assessed a fine for not following a rule. For example, in a club, if a member
is not wearing a name badge, that member may be charged a fine. Fines may
be assessed only if authorized in the bylaws of the organization, and the
District Enabling Law provides no such authority.
Suspension: A member may have a right, some rights, or
all rights of membership suspended for a period of time. This action may result
in a loss of "good standing" within the organization. The Board may not suspend or refuse to
count the vote of an elected member
Removal from
office: A
member may be removed from office. For example, the president could be
temporarily removed from presiding over a meeting using a suspension of the rules. Procedures
to permanently remove members from office vary; some organizations allow
removal only for cause, while in others, removal may be done at the pleasure of
the membership. California
Law does not authorize a Board to remove an elected member from office. Only a court of law holds such power.
Expulsion: A member may be
expelled from the organization or assembly. California Law does not
authorize a Board to expel an elected member from office. Only a court of law holds such power.
Some agencies also consider “no
action” and or demand of an “apology” as potential actions less severe than a
censure.
If action is to occur, the motion
to censure is a main motion; it requires a second; it is debatable and is amendable.
Subsidiary motions may be made. To be
adopted, a quorum must be present and a majority vote is required to approve
the motion. A member who is subject to censure may debate the censure measure, but
cannot vote on the motion.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board should discuss
these circumstances and may take action as it deems appropriate.
EXHIBITS
34-A May 1st Letter
from Director Hoffmann to M1W Board
34-B May 6th Letter
from General Manager and General Counsel to M1W Board
34-C District Meeting Rule 6
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2020\20200615\ActionItems\34\Item-34.docx