ITEM: |
ACTION ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
13. |
Consider Sending the State Water Resources Control Board
Correspondence Addressing Timelines and Penalties under the Cease and Desist
Order WR2016-0016 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
July 20, 2020 |
Budgeted: |
|
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt, |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
|
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: None |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: This action does not
constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines Section 15378. |
|||||
SUMMARY: On April 29, 2020
California American Water (Cal-Am) filed with the State Water Resources Control
Board its 2nd Quarterly Report for the 2019-2020 Water Year Addressing
Operations for the Period of January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020. Such a report is required under the extended
Cease and Desist Order (CDO). In the
report, Cal-Am stated that it is unlikely to meet Milestone 5 under the CDO due
to reasons outside of Cal-Am’s control (see “DISCUSSION” below.)
The penalty for missing a Milestone is a reduction
in the allowable Effective Diversion Limit from the Carmel River by 1,000
acre-feet. In effect, it reduces water
available for Cal-Am pumping by that amount.
The
District is defined as one of the “Applicants” under the CDO. If the report indicates that a Milestone is
likely to be missed for reasons beyond Applicants’ control, the State Water
Board may make a determination whether the cause for delay is beyond
Applicants’ control. If the State Water
Board determines that the cause is beyond Applicants' control, it may suspend
any corresponding reductions under Condition 3.b.vi until such time as the
Applicants can reasonably control progress towards the Milestone.
At
this time, the District as an Applicant, may seek to request suspension of a
reduction in the diversion limit in order to protect the interests of the
community, especially in light of the economic consequences of Covid-19 on the
local economy. Additionally, it is quite
apparent that the final December 31, 2021 Milestone will not be met by any
proposed water supply project, hence the proposed letter attached as Exhibit
13-A also includes a request to begin
discussions for a reasonable accommodation and extension of the CDO.
RECOMMENDATION: The General Manager recommends the Board approve sending
the correspondence attached as Exhibit 13-A.
DISCUSSION: Cal-Am’s 2nd Quarterly Report for the
2019-2020 Water Year Addressing Operations for the Period of January 1, 2020 to
March 31, 2020 filing included the following passages (emphasis added):
·
“Milestone 5, Water Year 2019-2020 ((1) Drilling activity for at least one
MPWSP Desalination Plant source water production well complete; (2) foundation
and structural framing complete for MPWSP Desalination Plant pretreatment
seawater reverse osmosis, and administration buildings at desalination plant;
(3) excavation complete for MPWSP Desalination Plant brine and backwash storage
basins; and (4) 25% of Desalination Plant transmission pipelines installed
based on total length, including 100% installation of the "Monterey
Pipeline and other ASR related improvements".)
·
The stay on physical construction of the desalination plant imposed by
the Monterey Superior Court currently remains in place until at least April 21,
2020. Although Cal-Am had been on track to complete permitting and begin
construction activities at the site, the court's stay precludes Cal-Am from
starting the necessary activities at the plant site in order to be able to
complete construction of the various plant facilities required under Milestone
5 by September 30, 2020. It is therefore unlikely that Cal-Am will be able
to complete all of the activities required under Milestone 5 by September 30,
2020. This setback resulting from the court's stay is beyond Cal-Am's control.
·
The Coastal Commission has not set a date for the continued hearing and
determination on Cal-Am's application for a coastal development permit for the
project's slant wells. Without a permit, Cal-Am cannot begin the necessary
activities in order to complete drilling activities for a slant well, as
required under Milestone 5. The delay caused by the Coastal Commission's
decision to continue the hearing, based on a determination made just 10 days
before the scheduled hearing that additional investigation was required, is
beyond Cal-Am's control.”
This highlights a need to revisit what the CDO milestones
dictate going forward. The attached
letter offers an opening to renew discussions with the State Water Board.
EXHIBIT
13-A Proposed Correspondence
to SWRCB
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2020\20200720\ActionItem\13\Item-13.docx