ITEM: |
CONSENT
CALENDAR |
||||
|
|||||
2. |
CONSIDER
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR UPGRADES AT THE SLEEPY
HOLLOW STEELHEAD REARING FACILITY |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
August
16, 2021 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt, General Manager |
Program/ |
Protect
Environmental Quality
|
||
|
|
Line Item
No.: |
2-3-1-O |
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
Thomas
Christensen and Larry
Hampson |
Cost
Estimate: |
$
67,500 |
||
|
|||||
General
Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee
Recommendation: The Administrative
Committee reviewed this item on August 9, 2021 and recommended approval. |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: Exempt
under §15262. |
|||||
SUMMARY: Staff proposes to retain Tetra Tech to assist
with preparation of plans, specifications, and a cost estimate for completing maintenance
work to the Sleepy Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility (SHSRF or Facility). Although recent upgrades were completed to
improve the reliability and quality of the water supply for the facility, other
portions of the facility including the rearing channel liner, quarantine tanks,
and refrigeration systems have reached their end-of-life cycles and need
maintenance and upgrades.
Staff requested proposals from four
consulting firms. Two (Tetra Tech and
Harris and Associates) responded with proposals (Exhibits
2-A
and 2-B). Both consulting firms have the needed
expertise and understanding of services required and provided similar scopes of
work. Tetra Tech has considerable
experience with design and construction at the Facility and their proposal was
about $34,000 less than the Harris and Associates proposal.
Tetra Tech proposal is a lump sum,
percentage of effort (i.e., each task would be billed on a percentage completed
up to 100% for each item).
RECOMMENDATION: The Administrative Committee recommends that
the Board authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Tetra
Tech for consultant services in an amount not-to-exceed $61,338 and approve a 10%
contingency (approximately $6,100) for additional consultant work.
DISCUSSION: The Sleepy Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility
was constructed in 1996 and was intended at the time to be a short-term
mitigation activity for impacts to Carmel River steelhead from diverting Carmel
River flows until a new water supply was built.
Recent upgrades to the facility were designed to improve the reliability
and quality of the water supply after the removal of San Clemente Dam led to an
increase in fine sediment in the Facility’s water supply. However, the upgrades did not address other
components at the facility that have reached or exceeded their life expectancy.
Staff proposes to carry out replacement of
portions of the Hypalon liner used to prevent water from leaking out of the
rearing channel. The liner, which has a
life expectancy of less than 20 years, has deteriorated, leaks in several
areas, and needs replacement.[1]
While the entire liner should eventually be
replaced, staff is proposing to replace only the liner in 16 of the 17 pools in
the rearing channel (one pool liner was recently replaced). Cobbles originally installed in the pools in
1996 to mimic natural habitat have been removed, which simplifies the removal
of the existing liner and reinstallation of a new liner. Work to replace this portion of the liner
would be carried out in the winter of 2021-22.
Staff may replace the liner in the remainder of the channel as a
separate project in the future.
In addition to the channel work proposed
for the upcoming winter, five fiberglass tanks used for quarantine purposes are
cracked and/or the bases supporting the tanks are deteriorating. These would be replaced and refrigeration
units for the tanks would be removed and replaced. The existing chillers are more than 20 years
old and chiller technology has advanced significantly since the original
installation. New chiller technology
includes the use of variable-speed drives, an evolution in control hardware, software,
and sensors that have led to improvements in industrial chiller reliability, accuracy,
and energy efficiency. Staff is also
considering centralization of
refrigeration into one unit that can quickly cool individual tanks or be
used to cool specific portions of the rearing channel when water temperatures
are too high.
Project construction work, which will be
subject to future bid processes, consists of:
Rearing channel pool maintenance (16
total):
•
Remove
existing Hypalon liner in each pool
•
Excavate
and dispose on site of approximately 6 inches of native material under the
pools
•
Shape
pool to drain
•
Pour
steel reinforced waterproof concrete slab (e.g., add Xypex to the concrete
mix); integrate into existing rearing channel concrete walls; work would
require inspection for rebar and concrete testing (minimum 4,000 psi concrete)
•
Install
new liner and integrate existing liner with new pool configuration at upstream
and downstream edges of the pool
•
Repair
top boards on rearing channel walls (if required)
•
Fill
rearing channel and inspect for water leakage
The plan set would include a site plan,
typical sections, and details of the rearing channel pool and rebar
configuration. Specifications would
include concrete strength, rebar size, concrete additives, and liner specifications.
There may be a need for a shoring design for the existing walls during
excavation and concrete pouring.
Approximately 6 inches of material will be removed from under the
existing pool walls, which are 18 inches thick at the base and 10 inches thick
at the top. Symmetrical pools may not
require shoring; however, non-symmetrical pools may need temporary supports
across the tops of the pool.
Quarantine Tanks (5 total)
•
Remove
and salvage decking
•
Cut
plumbing (air, water, drain); disconnect electrical service and monitoring
cables
•
Remove
and dispose existing quarantine tanks
•
Remove
existing chillers and replace with individual chillers or a centralized unit capable of lowering water temperature up to
approximately 10 degrees (TBD through calculation)
•
Excavate
and dispose native material under the existing tanks (depth TBD)
•
Determine
adequacy of native fill and import, compact, and test new base material as
required
•
Pour
steel reinforced, waterproof concrete slab
•
Build
new steel or aluminum support frames and reset tanks; connect plumbing, air,
electrical, drains, and monitoring cables above the decking or in an easily
accessible “critter-proof” box
•
Reinstall
decking
•
Test
all components
Consultant services would include remote site
inspection conducted with help from staff (e.g., pictures and video), a new set
of plans and specifications, and preparation of a class 2 Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost. An issue at the
facility to be addressed is how to reduce daytime temperatures in the quarantine
tanks, which can rise into a range that is stressful or lethal to young
steelhead. To determine appropriate
equipment for an upgrade of refrigeration facilities, an analysis of the
existing power supply and loads at the facility would be performed.
Staff requested proposals from three local
firms – Whitson Engineering, the Wallace Group, and Harris and Associates – and
from Tetra Tech, the firm that provided design and construction expertise for
the recently completed upgrade to the water supply. Whitson Engineering declined to propose
citing a lack of expertise for the requested services. The Wallace Group declined to propose and
stated that they would not be able to meet the schedule for the work. Tetra Tech and Harris and Associates both provided
proposals (see Exhibits 2-A and 2-B). Both firms provided a comprehensive
understanding of the services required; however, the Tetra Tech proposal was about
$34,000 less than the Harris & Associates proposal for approximately the
same scope of service (when excluding biddability review, bid phase support,
and optional items from Harris & Associates proposal).
Much of the facility infrastructure is
underground, is somewhat complex, and the proposed upgrades do not have
comprehensive as-built information.
Staff recommends a 10% contingency be approved for this work to cover
unexpected conditions at the site and to allow additional engineering services
during the bidding phase for construction.
Because of a potentially long lead time to
procure replacement tanks, MPWMD staff intend to prepare plans and
specifications as a separate project and invitation for bids. Approval for purchase of the tanks would come
before the Board of Directors for consideration at a future meeting, possibly
early in the fall of 2021. Similarly, should
it be warranted due to a long lead time, staff may seek approval for purchase
of new refrigeration unit(s) under a separate bid in advance of
construction and will seek approval for
construction of the project. These items would also come before the Board
of Directors for consideration at future meetings.
IMPACTS ON STAFF AND RESOURCES: Funds for this work are budgeted under Sleepy
Hollow Operations Budget Program line item 2-3-1-O Design/Construct Rearing
Channel and Quarantine Tank Improvements.
The work would be performed under the direction of the District Engineer.
EXHIBITS
2-A Tetra Tech
proposal dated July 12, 2021 “Rearing Channel and Quarantine Tank Maintenance
Upgrades”
2-B Harris &
Associates proposal dated July 30, 2021 “PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING
SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING FACILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE
SLEEPY HOLLOW STEELHEAD REARING FACILITY”
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2021\20210816\Consent
Calendar\02\Item-2.docx
[1] Hypalon is a chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE or CSE) synthetic rubber (CSM) noted for its resistance to chemicals, temperature extremes, and ultraviolet light. It was a product of DuPont Performance Elastomers containing trace amounts of carbon tetrachloride (< 0.2%), chloroform (< 0.02%), and talc (< 2%). It was popular as a material for rubber boats and was used by the US Navy. Production was discontinued in 2009. Internet citations show that burning Hypalon can release highly toxic fumes that are considered environmental pollutants. Additionally, some forms of Hypalon contain additives made from lead or lead compounds known for their danger. However, the 2007 DuPont company Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) recommends landfill or incineration for waste disposal (the material is insoluble in water). A contractor for the District (Scardina Builders) recently removed a portion of the rearing channel liner and disposed of it at the Marina landfill.