ITEM: |
CONSENT CALENDAR |
||||
|
|||||
8. |
Consider Rescinding Board Action on Item No. 14-B
Made on Monday, March 20, 2023 and Re-Authorizing the General Manager to
Approve Additional Funding for Raftelis in an Amount Not-To-Exceed $60,000 |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
April
17, 2023 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David
J. Stoldt, |
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line
Item No.: |
|
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David
J. Stoldt |
Cost
Estimate: |
$60,000 |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel
Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee
Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: This action does not
constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines Section 15378. |
|||||
SUMMARY:
At the March 20, 2023 Board meeting, the chair inquired whether there
were any additions or corrections to the agenda. The clerk answered in the
affirmative, stating that “due to the need for immediate consideration by the Board
for matters that arose after the posting of the published agenda and as
provided by Government Code section 54954.2 . . . the Board is being asked to
make the following addition . . .” The clerk went on to describe a request from
Director Karen Paull to appear remotely pursuant to Government Code section
54954.2(b)(4). General Manager Dave Stoldt then interjected that there was
another addition, Action Item 14.b, “and this would be to authorize expenditure
of up to $60,000 for an update to the rate study for Measure J by the Raftelis
financial consulting team.” A motion and a second to approve both items
immediately followed, and the Board took a roll call vote which passed
unanimously, 6 to 0 with one absence.
On March 31, 2023 California
American Water, through its attorney Nossaman LLP, sent a notice to the County
District Attorney of what it thought was a Brown Act violation in how the
District noticed, described, and voted on the item (see Exhibit 8-A).
The District Attorney responded on
April 4, 2023 that it determined no Brown Act violation occurred and the Board
took the requisite procedural steps to put item 14.b on the agenda and act upon
it (see Exhibit 8-B).
Nevertheless, Government Code
54960.1 (c) (2) provides the MPWMD Board, as a legislative body, the
opportunity to cure or correct action that has been challenged as failing to
comply with the Brown Act. Out of an abundance of caution, it is recommended
that the Board rescind its March 20, 2023 vote in favor of Item 14.b of that
meeting agenda and to re-authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract
amendment with Raftelis Financial Consultants not to exceed $60,000 to update
the rate study related to Measure J activities.
RECOMMENDATION: District General Counsel recommends that the Board
rescind its March 20, 2023 vote in favor of Item 14.b of that meeting agenda
and to re-authorize the General Manager to enter into a contract amendment with
Raftelis Financial Consultants not to exceed $60,000 to update the rate study
related to Measure J activities.
BACKGROUND: On March
13, 2023 District staff asked Raftelis for an estimate of cost and schedule to
update the Financial Plan/Rate Analysis (aka Rate Study) to reflect the new
appraisal of the Cal Am Monterey Water System and the Cal AM current GRC
application. On May 19, 2023 Raftelis provided an estimate of cost to be
$60,000 and completion by the end of May. This information came too late
to be noticed in the published agenda for the March 20, 2023 meeting.
EXHIBITS
8-A Cal-Am Letter Alleging Brown Act Violation
8-B Monterey
County District Attorney Determination of No Brown Act Violation
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2023\20230417\Consent
Calendar\08\Item-8.docx