Among California-American Water [California-American],
the State Coastal Conservancy [the Conservancy],
the Natural
Resources Agency,
the Division
of Safety of Dams [DSOD] of the Department of Water Resources [DWR],
the Monterey County Water Resources Agency [MCWRA],
the Monterey
Peninsula Water Management District [MPWMD],
the
Assemblyman
Bill Monning,
Congressman
Sam Farr, and
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s
Fisheries Service
[NOAA
Fisheries]
Regarding
River Reroute and Dam Removal
San Clemente Dam,
A. California-American
is a
B. The
Conservancy is an agency of the State of
C. The Division
of Safety of Dams (“DSOD”), whose purpose is to protect people
against loss of life and property from dam failure, is a division of the epartment of Water Resources (“DWR”),
which is charged with improving and sustaining
D. NOAA
Fisheries is an agency of the federal government within the Department of
Commerce, charged in part with conserving and protecting natural resources.
E. The CPUC
regulates privately owned electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water,
railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies, pursuant to
Article XII of the California Constitution.
The CPUC regulates the rates California- American can charge its
F. The MCWRA is
the entity charged with responsibility for the flood and storm waters of Cooperate
and act in conjunction with, the state, or any of its engineers, officers
Boards, commissions, departments, or agencies, or with the United States, or
any of its engineers, officers, Boards, commissions, departments, or agencies,
or with any public or private corporation, or with the County, in the
construction of any work for the controlling of flood or storm waters of, or
flowing into, the Agency, or for the protection of life or property therein, or
for the purpose of conserving those waters for beneficial use within the
Agency, or in any other works, acts, or purposes provided for herein, and adopt
and carry out any definite plan or system of work for any such purpose.
G. The MPWMD is a special district created by the State
Legislature in 1977 with for the
integrated management of ground and surface water supplies of the jurisdiction
over the recreational uses of, and work within, the Carmel River watershed. The MPWMD has the power to control the flood
and storm waters of the district and the flood and storm waters of streams that
have their sources outside of the district, which streams and floodwaters flow
into the district, and to conserve such waters for beneficial and useful
purposes of the district by spreading, storing, retaining, and causing to
percolate into the soil within or without the district, or to save or conserve
in any manner all or any of such waters and protect from damage from such flood
or storm waters the watercourses, watersheds, public highways, life and
property in the district, and the watercourses outside of the district of
streams flowing into the district. However, as stated in Agreement No.
A-06181 dated December 15, 1991 among
MCWRA, MPWMD, and the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency regarding the
exercise of the three agencies’ respective responsibilities, MCWRA has the
primary responsibility for flood control and drainage activities in the
H. California-American
owns the San Clemente Dam (“the dam”), located on the Carmel River in Monterey
County approximately 18 miles upstream from the mouth of the river in Monterey
Bay,. The dam was built in 1921 as a point of
diversion for potable water serving California-American’s
I. The
J. DSOD has
determined that the dam presents a safety hazard, and is requiring
California-American to remediate the hazard.
In December 2007, DWR completed the San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety
Project Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (“EIR/EIS”),
under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental
Policy Act, analyzing alternatives for addressing the safety issues. Alternatives reviewed include buttressing the
dam and removing it. DWR certified the
Final EIR on December 31, 2007.
K. Buttressing
the dam would resolve the immediate safety issue, and has the lowest construction
costs of the alternatives evaluated by DSOD, and would provide no benefits to
water supply.
L. Various
government agencies, including NOAA Fisheries, contend the dam constitutes a
significant barrier to steelhead trout, a threatened species under the federal
Endangered Species Act; and a partial barrier to the dispersal of the
M. The Parties
agree that the River Reroute and Dam Removal Project would result in multiple
public environmental benefits. These
benefits include improving restoring access
to 40 25 miles
of spawning and rearing habitat located upstream of the dam for
steelhead trout, restoring a portion of the natural sediment
supply to the downstream river and Carmel River State Bbeach,
restoring the ecological connectivity of the river and riparian corridor, and
providing new public recreational opportunities.
N. The
Conservancy has funded several recent studies concluding that the River Reroute
and Dam Removal Project is a feasible alternative.
O. California-American
is amenable to removal of the dam instead of buttressing it, provided that the
project will timely satisfy the safety concerns of DSOD and will not burden
California-American’s ratepayers and shareholders with excessive costs.
1. Purpose
a. The main purpose of this MOU is to
memorialize the commitment of all parties to devote staff time and other
available resources for the duration of this MOU to develop an implementation
strategy for the River Rereoute and Dam Removal Project that
meets the needs and constraints of all Parties.
b. To fulfill this purpose, the parties agree
that an evaluation of the comparative risks of buttressing to the River Reroute
and Dam Removal Project is necessary to informed decisionmaking, and agree to
pursue several efforts for the duration of this MOU in the next
year including studies necessary to fully and properly identify,
evaluate, and, if possible, quantify, the comparative risks and long-term
management costs to either (a) removing San Clemente Dam and re-routing the
Carmel River through San Clemente Creek; or (b) buttressing San Clemente Dam in
place, and constructing and maintaining fish passage over the buttressed San
Clemente Dam.
c. Another purpose of this MOU is to express the
willingness of various regulatory agencies, including but not limited to, DSOD
and NOAA Fisheries, to exercise prosecutorial discretion in enforcing various
orders or other mandates relating to San Clemente Dam while the aforementioned
studies are being completed.
d. All Parties agree that during the period of
this MOU careful consideration must be given to the risks and which Party is
best positioned to assume these risks to enable the River Reroute and Dam
Removal Project to proceed. Although it
is understood the Parties will require more information on the project risks
before deciding whether they are positioned to assume them, it is understood
that for the River Reroute and Dam Removal Project to proceed, these risks will
need to be apportioned between the Parties, or to other entities. The Parties agree to cooperate in achieving
this objective through participation in this MOU.
2. Cooperative
Efforts For Risk Assessment
a. Quarterly Meetings. All Parties agree to commit staff to
participate in quarterly meetings to discuss the progress and implementation
strategy. The first meeting will occur
in mid- to late- October 2009 and subsequent meeting dates will be selected at
the first meeting.
b. Risk Management Analysis. The Conservancy provided California-American
with a rough comparison of the major risks for both the buttressing and the dam
removal project and an analysis of the dam removal project’s potential long-term
failures based upon risk assessment work performed by Environmental Risk
Services (ERS) under contract to the Conservancy. The Conservancy agrees to
fund the approximately $7,000 for ERS to complete the risk table that
identifies and qualitatively assesses the risks of the Dam Removal
project. Further work will be based on
recommendations from all Parties pursuant to Paragraph 2.g.
c. Draft
Long Term Sediment Monitoring and Management Plan. URS Corporation, under contract to the
Conservancy has developed a scope of work for preparing a Long Term Sediment
Monitoring and Management Plan. This
plan would recommend tasks necessary to manage and monitor sequestered sediment
from San Clemente Dam to ensure the sediment does not mobilize and become a
safety hazard. California-American will
fund implementation of this scope of work, estimated to cost approximately
$40,000.
d. Geotechnical Analysis of San Clemente
Creek. URS Corporation and its
subconsultants under contract to the Conservancy completed geotechnical field
work, and had begun preparing a Draft Geotechnical Data Report (GDR) to
summarize the findings. In addition, the consultants conducted a geomorphologic
survey to inform design of the channel restoration. The Parties agree that the
Draft GDR and a summary memo of geomorphologic work need to be completed. The Conservancy SCC will fund
completion of these reports, estimated to cost $25,000.
e. Total Cost of Ownership. The Parties agree that it is important to
understand any differences in the long-term operation and maintenance costs of
a buttressed dam with fish passage facilities, compared to the River Reroute
and Dam Removal project.
California-American, with the assistance of the other Parties, will
prepare an analysis of the long term costs of maintaining the buttressed dam
and assess the long-term costs of the River Reroute and Dam Removal project.
f. Available Funding. The parties agree that the estimates to
remove San Clemente Dam and re-route the
g. Review and Consultation. The MPWMD, MCWRA, DSOD, NOAA Fisheries,
California-American and the Conservancy will make staff and other resources
available for consultation in the preparation of the above-referenced studies,
and shall review and provide comments on the accuracy, and completeness of the
studies, and whether there is a sufficient benefit to additional studies to
justify the expenditure of public and customer funds on such additional
studies.
3. Exercise
of Prosecutorial Discretion
a. State of
b.
NOAA
Fisheries. NOAA Fisheries has contended that San
Clemente Dam presents a barrier to fish passage and may constitute a take of
South Central California Coast Steelhead.
NOAA Fisheries also contends that the removal of San Clemente Dam would
represent a major improvement in steelhead habitat. NOAA Fisheries agrees that for the duration
of this MOU it will exercise prosecutorial discretion in enforcing the federal
Endangered Species Act with respect to fish passage at San Clemente Dam.
5. Miscellaneous
a. Sharing of information. The Parties will share information with the
other parties as needed to facilitate the completion of the studies identified
in Section 2.
b. Cooperation. Each of the parties will use its contacts and
abilities to assist in completion of the necessary studies and assessments.
c. Duration
of MOU. This MOU shall take effect
when fully signed, on the date last signed below and shall expire on July 6,
2010.
d. Authority. The persons signing below represent that they
have authority to sign the MOU on behalf of their respective entities.
e. Signatures
and counterparts. This MOU may be
signed in counterpart originals, which, when assembled together, shall
constitute one original agreement. The
Conservancy shall collect and collate the original signature pages, and shall
then provide to each signatory entity a copy of the fully signed MOU.
CONGRESSMAN
SAM FARR
_________________________ _____________________
Sam Farr Date
Member, House of Representatives,
ASSMEBLYMAN
BILL MONNING
_________________________ _____________________
Bill Monning Date
Member,
SUPERVISOR
DAVE POTTER
_________________________ _____________________
Dave Potter Date
Supervisor – Fifth District
NATURAL
RESOURCES AGENCY
_________________________ _____________________
Michael Chrisman Date
Secretary of Natural Resources
_________________________ _____________________
John Bohn Date
Commissioner
DIVISION OF
SAFETY OF DAMS, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
_________________________ _____________________
Dave Guiterriez Date
Chief, Division of Safety of Dams
NATIONAL
MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
_________________________ ______________________
Rodney McInnis Date
Regional Administrator
CALIFORNIA
STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY
_________________________ _____________________
Samuel Schuchat Date
Executive Officer
MONTEREY
COUNTY WATER RESOURCES AGENCY
_________________________ _____________________
Curtis Weeks Date
General Manager
MONTEREY
PENINSULA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
_________________________ _____________________
Darby Fuerst Date
General Manager
CALIFORNIA-AMERICAN
WATER CO.
_________________________ ______________________
Robert MacLean Date
President
U:\mpwmd\San Clemente
Dam\SCD Removal and River Reroute Alternative\MOU\Sept. 21, 2009 Board
meeting\item4_exh4a.doc