ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE |
||||
|
||||
3. |
Consider Expenditure of
Budgeted Funds to Contract with DHDettman to Provide Support on Sleepy Hollow
Steelhead Rearing Facility Priority Tasks |
|||
|
||||
Meeting Date: |
August 6, 2010 |
Budgeted: |
FY 2009-10 |
|
|
||||
From: |
Darby W. Fuerst, |
Program |
Project Expenditures |
|
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
2-3-1 I. |
|
|
||||
Prepared By: |
|
Cost Estimate: |
$4,000 |
|
|
||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
||||
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee considered this item on August 6, 2010 and recommended ________________. |
||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
||||
SUMMARY: The Board will consider authorizing the
General Manager to enter into a contract with DHDettman, Aquatic Biologist
(DHDettman) for an amount not-to-exceed $4,000, to assist with (a) advising
staff and contractors on the best approaches to take for emergency repairs
necessary to prevent immediate loss of steelhead being reared at the Sleepy
Hollow Steelhead Rearing Facility (SHSRF), (b) assisting with the review of any
proposals, grant applications, or vendor contracts in FY 2010-2011 to update
and retrofit the Sleepy Hollow
Steelhead Rearing Facility’s sediment control and raw water intake structures,
and (c) assisting the Senior Fisheries Biologist in responding to final public
and interagency comments on the SHSRF’s Rescue and Rearing Management Plan (RRMP) that result from the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishing the final draft of the RRMP
in the Federal Record. District
staff selected DHDettman for this work because of the consultant’s familiarity
with the design, construction, and operation of the SHSRF. Based on this experience and expertise,
District staff believes that DHDettman will provide the most cost-effective and
timely assistance in responding to these issues.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve expenditure of the funds in the not-to-exceed amount of $4,000 to contract with DHDettman to (1) provide ongoing advice on recommended approaches for emergency repairs at the SHSRF, (2) assist District staff in the review and revision of plans, grants and contracts to retrofit the water intake at the SHSRF, and (3) assist District staff in the final review and revision of the SHSRF’s RRMP, based on final public comments received after NMFS publishes the RRMP in the Federal Record. The Administrative Committee considered this matter at its August 6, 2010 meeting and recommended .
IMPACT ON FISCAL AND STAFF RESOURCES: The funds for the contract proposed in Exhibits 3-A, 3-B, & 3-C are included in the Fiscal Year 2010-2011 budget under Project Expenditures, Line Item No. 2-3-1 H., Consulting Services.
BACKGROUND: The
MPWMD operates and maintains the SHSRF as an integral component of the
Mitigation Program for the MPWMD Water Allocation Program, and following its
mission statement and legislative directive to manage, augment and protect
water resources for the benefit of the community and environment. The SHSRF
serves as a temporary holding and rearing environment for fish that are rescued
from habitats in the lower
In 1997, steelhead in
south-central
One of the primary purposes of this contract is represented by Task #1 in the Scope of Work (Exhibit 3-A) to allow DHDettman to provide on-call advice to staff or the District’s contractors for urgent repairs needed at the SHSRF. DHDettman is the designer of, and was the project manager for the construction of the SHSRF, so is more familiar with it than any other person. The rate that DHDettman is proposing for on-call services is slightly less than what is charged for emergency response by the available high voltage electrical contractors, generator service repairmen, or agricultural pump and plumbing contractors that the District normally uses for regular repairs and maintenance at the SHSRF. In addition, DHDettman’s familiarity with the SHSRF enables him to diagnose problems far faster than any on-call service person could, who might be mostly unfamiliar with the layout of the SHSRF, thereby having to spend considerable time and expense reviewing as-built blueprints or wiring diagrams before beginning repair or diagnosis of the SHSRF’s systems. His advice will likely accelerate the rate at which the proper repair is made, and likely save considerable costs that would otherwise have to be billed to diagnose the problem by the contractor hired to make the repairs.
Also attached are a Fee Schedule for each task, including the estimated time to be allocated to it, and a not-to-exceed cost for Tasks #1, #2, and #3 (Exhibit 3-B), and a simplified proposed Work Schedule for Tasks #1, #2, and #3 (Exhibit 3-C).
3-A Scope of Work for DHDettman.
3-B Fee Schedule provided by DHDettman.
3-C Work Schedule for DHDettman.
U:\staff\word\committees\Admin\2010\20100806\03\item3.doc