|
ADMINISTRATIVE
COMMITTEE |
||||
|
|
||||
|
8. |
AUTHORIZE CONTRACT FOR BOND
COUNSEL SERVICES RELATED TO GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT PROJECT WATER PURCHASE
AGREEMENT |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Meeting
Date: |
September 9, 2013 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
|
|
|
||||
|
From: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Program/ |
TBA |
|
|
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
TBA |
|
|
|
||||
|
Prepared
By: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
Not to exceed $90,000 |
|
|
|
||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
||||
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee reviewed this item on September 9, 2013 and recommended ____________________. |
||||
|
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
||||
SUMMARY: The successful permanent financing of the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) project will depend on a secure contract for the purchase of potable product water by Cal-Am. That contract will be known as a Water Purchase Agreement (WPA).
In the July 31, 2013 ”Large” Settlement Agreement the Parties agreed to proceed expeditiously with development of a WPA. There are many layers of complexity and specialized Bond Counsel services are required. The section of the Settlement Agreement relating to GWR is attached as Exhibit 8-A. Issues relating to the WPA appear throughout. The General Manager is proposing extending the District’s existing Bond Counsel, Sidley Austin, represented by Eric Tashman, to serve in this capacity. Costs will be recovered from the issuance of the debt, however if the GWR project does not go forward and debt is not issued, then the District will have incurred the costs out-of-pocket.
RECOMMENDATION: The General Manager recommends that the Committee recommend that the Board of Directors approve extending the services of Sidley Austin to provide Bond Counsel services for a GWR WPA and the expenditure of up to $90,000.
8-A Overview of Settlement
Agreement as it relates to GWR
U:\staff\Board_Committees\Admin\2013\20130909\08\item8.docx