LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY
COMMITTEE
ITEM: |
DISCUSSION
ITEMS |
||||
|
|||||
3. |
UPDATE ON STATE WATER BOND AND STRATEGIES FOR GETTING FIRST IN LINE |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
August 20, 2014 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
David J.
Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
|
||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
Summary: On
August 13, 2014 the California Legislature approved AB 1471, a new Water Bond
that will be placed before the voters in the November election.
Attached as Exhibit 3-A is a summary of the
bill. Of the $7.5 billion, only
approximately $2.4 billion will be relevant to the needs of the Monterey
Peninsula.
Section |
Amount in AB 1471 ($million) |
Amount Relevant To Monterey Peninsula |
Discussion |
Ch. 5 |
$520 |
$0 |
Water quality for small and disadvantaged
communities;
Unlikely to help Peninsula, but would be relevant to assist
Watsonville and other impaired areas of the County; However, limits construction grants to $5
million ($20 million for regional projects) which doesn’t help enough. |
Ch. 6 |
$1,495 |
$505 |
Most of this money is earmarked. Of $302.5 million in Section 79731 only
$100.5 is to the State Coastal Conservancy and most of that will be expended elsewhere; Other possible
moneys include Section 79733 with $200
million for enhanced stream flows, Section79735(b) with $20 million for urban
watersheds, but 25% is earmarked for disadvantaged communities, and Section
79737 with $285 million for watershed restoration outside of the Delta. All other monies in this Chapter are
earmarked for elsewhere in the State. |
Ch. 7 |
$810 |
$343 |
Section 79744 is $510 million of geographic
funding through the IRWM program. The
Central Coast has only $43 million authorized. In earlier Rendon
and Hueso bills, $58 million was targeted for the
Central Coast region. In the June
revision to SB 848 (Wolk) the regional amount was $85
million. This is a reduction. However, we favorably view Section 79746
with $100 million for water conservation and Section 79747 with $200 million
for stormwater.
However, this is a reduction for stormwater
from $500 million in the June version.
We on the Central Coast are faced with other California regulatory
mandates to eliminate stormwater discharges to
Areas of Special Biological Significance (i.e. Monterey Bay) so a higher
funding level is preferred and assurances that ocean dischargers can compete
for the funds is needed. Prop 84’s stormwater rules excluded ocean dischargers. |
Ch. 8 |
$2,700 |
$0 |
State Water Project, CALFED, Bay-Delta
only. |
Ch. 9 |
$725 |
$725 |
We love this. Includes water recycling, desalination, and
potable reuse. This is up from $500
million in the June version. |
Ch. 10 |
$900 |
$730 |
We might be able to apply for funding of
the Aquifer Storage and Recovery or Groundwater Replenishment projects here,
but will be a stretch. 10% set aside
for disadvantaged communities. |
Ch. 11 |
$395 |
$100 |
This is primarily a Delta levee protection
chapter. However, the Carmel River
lagoon barrier and other flood control measures would compete for crumbs of
the remainder. |
TOTAL |
$7,195 |
$2,403 |
|
EXHIBIT
3-A Summary of AB 1471
U:\staff\Board_Committees\Legislative\2014\20140820\03\item3.docx