Exhibit 1-C

Comparison of Existing vs. Proposed WDS Review Levels

(for Selected EXAMPLES/Scenarios)

 

AREA

EXAMPLE/SCENARIO

EXISTING REVIEW

PROPOSED REVIEW

LEVEL

CHANGE

 

C.V.

Uplands

Low use, single parcel in Carmel River Watershed and >1000’ from any well, alluvium or listed tributary

3-Hearing Officer

1-Waiver

 

 

C.V.

Uplands

High use, single parcel in Carmel River Watershed but <1000’ from alluvium or listed tributary

3-Hearing Officer

 

Same

C.V.

Uplands

High use, single parcel, in Carmel River Watershed, commercial/industrial project

3-Hearing Officer

 

4-Full Board Hearing

 

C.V.

Uplands

Low use, multiple parcel system in Carmel River Watershed with small parcels

4-Full Board Hearing

3-Hearing Officer

Seaside non-coastal

Low use, single parcel system with small parcel

0-Exempt

 

3-Hearing Officer

Seaside all areas

Low use, multiple parcel system with small parcels

4-Full Board Hearing

3-Hearing Officer

Seaside non-coastal

Single parcel commercial/industrial project

0-Exempt

 

3-Hearing Officer or

4-Full Board Hearing

C.V.

Alluvium

Two parcel system with small lots and low water use

4-Full Board Hearing

3-Hearing Officer

C.V.

Alluvium

Single parcel, but with large lot or high water use

3-Hearing Officer

 

4-Full Board Hearing

 

Other Areas

Single parcel with small lot and low water use

0-Exempt

 

Same

Other Areas

High use, single parcel or with large lot

0-Exempt

 

3-Hearing Officer

Other Areas

Single parcel commercial/industrial project

0-Exempt

 

3-Hearing Officer

All Areas

All subdivisions

Various

3-Hearing Officer or

4-Full Board Hearing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

______ White = level of review unchanged from existing Rules and Regulations

 

______ Grey   = level of review streamlined

 

______ Black  = level of review increased

 

▼ = level of review streamlined

▲=  level of review increased

= level of review the same            

U:\Henri\wp\staffnote\2004\WDSrevuexamples062204.doc (prepared by MDias/JO/HS)