EXHIBIT 2-D
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ORDINANCE
OPTIONAL ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS
Use of OAH where potential fine exceeds
$25,000 or repeat violations, or other administrative compliance issues
including public nuisance abatement
RULE 111.5 ALTERNATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLIANCE
A. The District Board may refer to its
General Counsel administrative actions for violations of District Rules and
Regulations which involve continuing or recurring violations, actions where the
potential penalty would exceed $25,000, or actions for administrative abatement
of public nuisances.
B.
The
action shall commence with the issuance of a written order to the Person
responsible for the violation setting forth
a description of the observed violation(s), a description of what the
Responsible Party is required to do to bring the water use or property into
compliance, and the date by which compliance must be achieved. The order provides notice as to
administrative penalties that shall accrue if compliance with the order is not
achieved by the date listed on the order.
The order may be contested through an administrative hearing
process. An Administrative Order issued
after hearing may contain a requirement to correct any violations determined to
exist, together with an order to pay administrative penalties and costs.
C.
An administrative action order pursuant to this Rule
shall be served in accord with the provisions of Rule 111.7, and shall contain
the following information:
1. The date of the violation or, if the date
of the violation is unknown, then the date the violation is identified;
2. The address or a definite description of
the location where the violation occurred;
3. Reference to the section of the Rules and
Regulations violated and a description of the circumstances pertaining to the violation;
4.
The actions required to correct the violation;
5.
The penalty related to the violation, if compliance is
not achieved;
6. A prohibition on the continuation or
repeated occurrence of the Rules and Regulations violation described in the order;
7.
A
description of the administrative compliance process, including the time within
which the order may be contested and the place from which a request for hearing
form may be obtained and an explanation of
the consequences of noncompliance with this Rule; and
8. The name and signature of the General Counsel
or his delegated agent acting as Enforcement Officer.
D. Any recipient of a Rule 111.5 order may
contest that there was a violation of District Rules and Regulations, or that
he or she is the Responsible Party, or that a penalty should not be imposed by
completing a request for hearing form and returning it to the District within
thirty (30 days from the date of the order.
E. If the District General Counsel
determines that all violations have been corrected within the time specified in
the order, no further action shall be taken.
Notice of this action shall be forwarded to any party requesting a
hearing. If full compliance with each
violation is not achieved within the time specified in the order, the General
Counsel shall coordinate with an Administrative Law Judge and prepare a written
notice of hearing for the judge’s signature to be served on the violator and,
where real property is involved, a notice of hearing shall be served on the
property owner at the address as it appears on the last equalized county
assessment roll available on the date the notice is prepared.
F. Actions brought pursuant to this Rule
shall be heard by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) retained through the
California Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) in accord with Government
Code §27727. Compensation for ALJ
services shall be by contract with OAH.
G. The General Manager is authorized to
enter into contract with OAH for these services and to budget for this expense.
H. The provisions of Rules 114.3 through 119.6
apply to a Rule 111.5 proceeding.
U:\General (NEW)\MPWMD - Main\WMD
Ordinances\Administrative Enforcement Ordinance Alternative Language.doc
U:\staff\word\committees\RulesRegsReview\2008\02\item2_exh2d.doc