WATER
DEMAND COMMITTEE |
|||||
|
|
||||
ITEM: |
ACTION
ITEMS |
||||
|
|||||
2. |
REVIEW AND DISCUSS DRAFT CONCEPT
ORDINANCE—ADDING A PROCESS FOR SUB-POTABLE WATER USE CREDITS TO THE
DISTRICT’S RULES AND REGULATIONS |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
October 16, 2007 |
|
|
||
|
|||||
From: |
David A. Berger, |
|
|
||
|
General Manager |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
Prepared by: |
|
|
|||
SUMMARY: At the September 17, 2007 Board meeting the
General Manager of the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency made a presentation
on the recycled water component of the agency’s proposed Regional Urban Water
Augmentation (RUWA) Project. Following the
presentation, the Board discussed the concept of allowing Sub-potable Water Use
Credits as a potential incentive for owners of
The Water Demand Committee is expected to discuss: 1) preparation of a revised concept ordinance that includes Sub-potable Water Use Credit transfers; (2) what level of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review will be required before the ordinance can be considered by the Board; and (3) the fiscal consequences of expanding the concept ordinance to include a transfer provision. District General Counsel, David Laredo, will address CEQA as it pertains to potentially including in the concept ordinance a provision that would allow consideration of transferring Sub-potable open space Water Use Credit, as requested by the Board on September 17. The Sub-potable Water Use Credit first reading draft ordinance reviewed on August 14 by the Water Demand Committee, previously known as No. 130, did not contain a transfer provision. Staff completed and circulated an initial study and proposed negative declaration analyzing the potential environmental effects of that version of the ordinance, in compliance with CEQA, and written comments thereon were received from attorney Michael Stamp and staff of the Monterey County Department of Environmental Health (Exhibit 2-B). Since the draft first reading version of the ordinance was not considered by the Board, staff has not responded to the CEQA comments. At a minimum, a new initial study would be necessary to address the potential direct and cumulative environmental impacts of allowing consideration of applications to transfer Sub-potable Water Use Credits created under the draft concept ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: The Water Demand Committee should review and comment on the draft Concept Ordinance (“Adding a Process for Sub-potable Water Use Credits”), including a revision to the ordinance that would enable consideration of Sub-potable Water Use transfers, including the CEQA review required for same; and provide guidance to staff and legal counsel regarding processing of the Concept Ordinance for future consideration by the Board.
BACKGROUND: (Note: The text of the following section of this staff report is substantively the same as the Background section in the report provided for the August 14, 2007 Water Demand Committee meeting.) The draft Concept Ordinance, as written, provides an incentive for replacing existing Non-Residential Potable water irrigation with Sub-potable Water. This ordinance adds the new definition “Sub-potable Water Use Credit” to the District’s Rules and Regulations. The prerequisite for a Sub-potable Water Use Credit is the permanent replacement of Non-Residential Potable water irrigation (originating from the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System or Seaside Groundwater Basin) with: (1) Sub-potable Water originating from outside the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System and the Seaside Groundwater Basin, or (2) Recycled or Reclaimed Water from the Carmel Area Wastewater District or Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control District wastewater treatment facilities.
The
cost of re-plumbing existing Irrigation Systems to accommodate Sub-potable
Water can be daunting. For this reason,
at the May 9, 2007, Water Demand Committee meeting, staff requested the
committee’s input on preparation of an ordinance that would allow a Water Use
Credit for conversion of Potable irrigation water to Sub-potable Water. The Water Demand Committee consensus was to
draft an ordinance that would offer an On-Site Water Use Credit incentive for
irrigation conversion from Potable to Sub-potable water, as an incentive for
participation by the
The draft Concept Ordinance enacts a process similar to the one set forth in Rule 25.5 for Water Use Credits: Sub-potable Water Use Credits would be available for the permanent replacement of all Potable water irrigation with Sub-potable Water. A Sub-potable Water Use Credit would be non-transferable and would allow reuse of up to 75 percent of the Potable water reduction on the Site. A Sub-potable Water Use Credit can be applied to future water use on that Site at any time within a period of 60 months. After the 60th month, the Sub-potable Water Use Credit is renewed only after verification that some or all water savings represented by that credit are current (i.e. no Water Permit or other use of the Water Use Credit has occurred). If all savings are not current, a pro-rata reduction occurs. A single renewal period of 60 months is allowed; thereafter any remaining unused Sub-potable Water Use Credit expires. A Sub-potable Water Use Credit on a Redevelopment Project Site is allowed to have its expiration date extended for two (2) additional periods of sixty (60) months each, providing a maximum period of two hundred forty (240) months to use a credit on a Redevelopment Project Site.
Landscape Water Budgets are the basis for the Sub-potable Water Use Credit calculation. Rather than using actual water consumption records for the Site, which can be higher or lower depending on a number of factors, the Landscape Water Budget, required of most of the potential conversion Sites, is the method proposed for calculation of the Sub-potable Water Use Credit. Landscape Water Budgets are based on reasonable and efficient irrigation practices and considers the type of landscaping and other factors. Landscape Water Budgets are prepared by Landscape Irrigation Auditors who have been trained to assess the water needs of various plants based on soil types, Irrigation System efficiency criteria, location, etc. The use of the Landscape Water Budget for establishing the Sub-potable Water Use Credit will ensure that artificial inflation of Potable water use can not occur, and that the credit reflects a reasonable amount of water required for the specific Landscaping. The procedure for documenting a Sub-potable Water Use Credit is proposed in Section 5-G of the draft Concept Ordinance.
A number of checks are put into place in this ordinance to ensure that any use of a Sub-potable Water Use Credit could not exceed the prior Potable use and would result in water savings. The ordinance limits the source of Sub-potable Water to (1) either an On-Site well or other Water Distribution System with a Source of Supply outside the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System and the Seaside Groundwater Basin, or (2) Reclaimed or Recycled Water from the Carmel Area Wastewater District (CAWD) or Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency (MRWPCA). The ordinance further limits the amount of credit to 75 percent of the original Potable use as determined using the Landscape Water Budget (i.e., Estimated Applied Water) developed for the existing Landscaping and verified with both On-Site inspection and by review of orthophotography of the Site to verify that all Landscaping has been permitted by the District (if required). The remaining 25 percent of the saved water is permanently reserved as conservation savings to reduce overall local water consumption.
Potential for
Sub-potable Water Use Credit
The potential
for Sub-potable Water Use Credits is somewhat limited. There are two tertiary treatment facilities
that have existing Recycled Water distribution systems that serve or will serve
a portion of the general
MRWPCA has proposed
the Regional Urban Recycled Water Distribution Project which would provide Recycled
Water to replace current Potable and Sub-potable Water uses within the Marina
Coast Water District, former
MRWPCA has
identified a number of potential Sites in the City of
Small Water Distribution Systems (water Wells) are located throughout the District that pump water from water sources not connected to either the Monterey Peninsula Water Resource System or the Seaside Groundwater Basin, both of which are under legal pumping constraints. Conversion of Non-Residential Potable water irrigation to Small Water Distribution System Sources of Supply outside the regulated systems would qualify for credit under the proposed ordinance. As the ordinance limits credit to Non-Residential uses, the number of Sites that could potentially qualify is limited.
Restricting the Sub-potable Water Use Credit to 75 percent of the converted demand, and limiting qualification for a Sub-potable Water Use Credit to Non-Residential use, reduces the potential for consumption above the Landscape Water Budget. Furthermore, as discussed above, the potential for On-Site reuse is limited. The ordinance does not allow transferring Sub-potable Water Use Credits to another Site, thereby eliminating any possibility for relocation of the former use.
District
Regulation XIII
District staff has identified two scenarios where reduced water savings within the District may occur as the result of this project.
Currently,
District Regulation XIII controls the use of Sub-potable Water. Under Rule 131, the MPWMD Board can declare
the availability of Sub-potable Water as an alternative to irrigating
Rule 131 is patterned after California Water Code Section 13550, which declares the use of Potable domestic water for nonpotable uses as Water Waste or an unreasonable use of water within the meaning of Section 2 of Article X of the California Constitution, if Recycled Water is available that meets certain conditions.
Creation of Sub-potable Water Use Credits saves about 25 percent of the Potable irrigation, whereas implementation of Rules 131 and 132, as well as Water Code Section 13550, would save 100 percent.
Similarly,
State Water Resources Control Board Order No. WR 95-10 ordered California
American Water to “obtain water from other sources of supply and make
one-for-one reductions in unlawful diversions from the
An
argument for adoption of this ordinance as it relates to the potential
substitution of 300 AFY of Potable water with Recycled Water from MRWPCA
without District Board action to implement Rules 131 and 132 is the cost of
moving Recycled Water from MRWPCA into the District. That cost could be as high as $3,000 per
acre-foot[4]. In conversations with staff from the City of
The second scenario identifies the impact to community water use due to the potential for Non-Residential water use that could otherwise be stopped during water rationing or emergencies by prohibitions on water use for irrigation. Stages 6 and 7 Water Rationing of the District’s Expanded Water Conservation and Standby Rationing Plan contain a provision whereby Non-Residential outdoor water use and operation and maintenance of ornamental water uses could be prohibited[5]. Allowing reuse of 75 percent of the water saved for new or expanded Non-Residential uses on the Site reduces the water savings associated with these rules and could potentially impact the amount of water available to other Non-Residential water users. Using the MRWPCA capacity (300 AFY) as an example, the maximum potential loss in water savings is 225 AFY during Stages 6 and 7. The loss of this savings could impact Non-Residential water users who would be rationed together as a group.
EXHIBITS
2-A Draft Concept Ordinance--Adding a Process for Sub-potable Water Use Credits
2-B Written Comments Received on Initial Study/Proposed Negative Declaration for Concept Ordinance (formerly know as No. 130)
U:\staff\word\committees\waterdemand\2007\20071016\02\item2.doc
[1] Per Amended and Restated Reclamation Project Construction and Operation Agreement (2004), between CAWD, PBCSD, MPWMD and Pebble Beach Company.
[2] Agreement for Sale of Recycled Water between MPWMD and each of the five entities receiving the recycled water (December 15, 2004)
[3] Regional Urban Recycled Water Distribution Project, prepared by RBF Consulting for Marina Coast Water District and the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency, July 2003
[4] Presentation by MRWPCA, April 16, 2007, titled
“Interest in Providing Recycled Water to the
[5] District Rule 166-M, Rule 166-O, and Rule 167-L, found in the Rules and Regulations of the MPWMD.