WATER SUPPLY PLANNING
COMMITTEE
ITEM: |
DISCUSSION
ITEMS |
||||
|
|||||
2. |
UPDATE ON POTENTIAL FOR
SEAWATER DESALINATION WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES |
||||
Meeting
Date: |
January 28, 2011 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
From: |
|
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
Andrew
Bell |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Review: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA Compliance: N/A |
|||||
District Engineer Andrew Bell
sent to Steven Quimby of the
·
a site map of the former
·
a summary of MPWMD investigations in 1990 of
water supply potential on the
In his letter, Mr. Bell requested a follow-up meeting with Mr. Quimby to address any questions he may have regarding the transmitted information and to discuss the process for pursuing a project at this site.
Moss Landing Water Project
At the November 15, 2010
Committee meeting, David Armanasco and representatives of Desal America,
Calera, and
District Engineer Andrew Bell attended an open house at the Moss Landing Water Project’s proposed plant site on January 7, 2010. He spoke with engineers from Desal America and Calera regarding the proposed project.
City of
At the December 8, 2010 Committee meeting, the Committee directed staff to select the three most promising sites along the coast in Sand City, and to provide Committee members with information regarding potential locations of desalination project facilities, site access, potential yield for each site, and permitting needs. Committee members intend to use this information in discussions with the respective property owners. Staff is in the process of preparing this information and will provide it to the Committee members when it is completed.
At the December 8, 2010 meeting, the Committee also requested that staff speak with Martin Feeney, hydrogeology consultant on the City of Sand City’s desalination project, regarding the impacts of additional wells on the City’s project. District Engineer Andrew Bell contacted Mr. Feeney, who stated that additional wells in the vicinity of the City’s intake and discharge facilities would disrupt the location of the fresh water/sea water interface, causing a greater portion of seawater to be drawn into the intake wells. The vertical intake wells draw water from both the seawater and the fresh water sides of the interface. The project is designed so that the reject water, which is discharged via a horizontal “concentrate discharge well” located along the coast between the intake wells, is salinity neutral in comparison with the adjacent seawater. If the feedwater produced by the intake wells becomes more saline, the resulting higher salinity of the reject water causes a violation of the conditions of the City’s discharge permit for the project.
EXHIBITS
None
U:\staff\word\committees\WaterSupply\2011\20110128\02\item2.doc