WATER SUPPLY
PLANNING COMMITTEE |
||||
|
||||
ITEM: |
DISCUSSION ITEMS |
|||
|
||||
4. |
DISCUSS PURE WATER
MONTEREY BUDGET REVISION AND EXPECTATIONS FOR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR |
|||
|
||||
Meeting Date: |
October 14, 2014 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
|
|
||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
Groundwater Replenishment
Project |
|
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: 1-5-1 |
||
|
||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
$1,405,000 |
|
|
||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
||||
Committee Recommendation: |
||||
CEQA
Compliance: N/A |
||||
SUMMARY: At
its June meeting the District Board adopted a budget that included expenditure
of up to $1,405,000 of the Water Supply Charge for the Groundwater
Replenishment Project. This was based
upon a 75% share of the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency
(MRWPCA) May 22nd “bare bones” GWR total budget of $1,580,000 plus
what we believed was an additional $293,000 of incremental needs for the
externalities study, water purchase agreement, outreach, etc.
After the District Board adopted its budget, MRWPCA subsequently adopted
a budget of $1,000,000 which, based on the cost sharing percentages, implied a
total GWR budget of $4,000,000. We have
not ever agreed to a budget of that magnitude, nor do we have budgeted funds
for a $3 million cost share.
Subsequently, MRWPCA adopted monthly budgets totaling $1,083,000 year to
date.
At its September 29, 2014 meeting the MRWPCA adopted a revised
Groundwater Replenishment budget of $2,339,000 (Exhibit 4-A).
This was done with input from the District as described in Exhibit 4-B, where we requested an incremental
addition of $607,000. That amount was
pared down at the request of MRWPCA to $344,000 by reducing the Public Outreach
budget to $90,000 and defining the time period as through the end of January
2015, rather than the whole year.
Please note that the District’s adopted number is also very close to 75%
of the “Budget A” figure from MRWPCA’s June 19th Recycled Water
Committee memorandum (Exhibit 4-C),
minus $74,883 in grant funds and minus $100,000 in carry forward balances. That number would be $1,417,000 hence our
adopted budget was built on the bare bones, but consistent with MRWPCA
representations. MRWPCA’s Recycled Water
Committee initially recommended their Board adopt Budget A.
Now it is clear that are not sufficient funds available for GWR purposes
this fiscal year. The newly adopted
MRWPCA budget would yield a 75% cost share of $1,635,000 – an amount the
District has not agreed to fund. The
adopted MRWPCA budget at this time does not assume the 75%-25% cost
sharing. Further, the adopted MRWPCA
budget is now only through January 2015, so clearly additional funding will be
required, for which the District has not identified sources of funds.
The Committee should discuss the funding situation and prepare for
mid-year budget adjustments in January.
EXHIBITS
4-A MRWPCA Groundwater Replenishment Budget
Approved September 29, 2014
4-B MPWMD Letter to MRWPCA Dated September 12,
2014
4-C MRWPCA Alternative GWR budgets
U:\staff\Board_Committees\WSP\2014\20141014\04\item4.docx