WATER SUPPLY PLANNING COMMITTEE |
||||
|
||||
PRESENTATION |
||||
|
||||
6. |
EXPLANATION OF
TABLE 13 WATER RIGHTS |
|||
|
||||
Meeting Date: |
May 4, 2020 |
Budgeted: |
N/A |
|
|
||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
|
|
General Manager |
Line Item
No.: |
N/A |
|
|
||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
|
|
||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
||||
CEQA
Compliance: This action does not
constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines Section 15378. |
||||
SUMMARY: On July 6, 1995 the State Water Board issued Decision No.
1632 which approved Application 27614 by the Monterey Peninsula Water
Management District for the appropriation of water from the Carmel River by the
New Los Padres Project. This became the
District’s Permit 20808 water right.
The
District was approved for up to 42 cubic feet per second of direct diversion
and 24,000 acre feet annually (afa) to storage, not to exceed a combined total
diversion of 29,000 afa. The authorized
season of direct diversion and diversion to storage was from November 1 of each
year to June 30 of the following year.
The
decision included conditions which provide that any permit issued to the
District shall:
a.
Be
junior in priority to the rights of persons diverting water for reasonable
beneficial use under valid and properly exercised riparian, overlying, pre- and
post-1914 appropriative claims of right (which were then currently prior to the
District’s Application 27614), and
b. Be junior to any approved
application for an appropriative right for certain persons identified in the
decision who are using established quantities of water within the watershed of
origin, irrespective of the priority of such applications vis a vis the District's application.
The
“certain persons” under “b” above were
identified in Table 13 of the Decision.
Condition 10 of the Decision provided an opportunity for the persons
named in Table 13 to obtain a water right permit with a priority superior to
the District’s Permit 20808. The Table
13 list were given an opportunity to document their water use and seek
revisions to the Table 13 quantities listed in the original decision. Decision 1632 and its Table 13 were amended
March 17, 1997 and the restated Table 13 is included as Exhibit 6-A.
In 1993, California American Water (Cal-Am) was
issued its Permit 30215A – its Table 13 water right – for the diversion shall
not exceed 4.1 cubic feet per second from December 1 of each year to May
31 of the succeeding year. The maximum annual diversion shall not exceed 1,488
acre-feet during the authorized diversion season. Because the permit is seasonally limited to
December 1 through May 31 each year and subject to instream flow requirements actual
production will vary by water year. In
the District’s Supply and Demand analysis, we assumed 300 AFA on average. The place of use is limited to within the California-American Water Company service area, Carmel River watershed area only.
Very few applications associated with Table 13 have
been processed. It turns out that many of the applications made back in
the 1990s have been cancelled. After the National Marine Fishing Service
(NMFS) introduced instream flow requirements in 2002, several applicants balked
at completing the permit process, so there are several “pending”
applications. Also, SWRCB has routinely been writing permits for much
less than the “face value” amount in the application (Cal-Am’s Table 13 permit
is a prime example).
Many of the applicants on Table 13 are also current
riparian diverters, so it’s a bit messy trying to parse riparian use and Table
13 applications and permits. In the future, some of the riparian
diverters that hold a Table 13 permit may be able to divert under either right
– but not both at the same time. So, for those diverters, it would be
double-counting potential water use to add riparian and appropriative rights
together. The non-Cal-Am production from the alluvial aquifer has
averaged a little more than 2,300 AFY. Exhibit
6-B shows how all of the Carmel River water
rights interact, as of 2015.
EXHIBITS
6-A Table
13 Water Rights Holders
6-B Summary
of Carmel River Water Rights (2015)
U:\staff\Board_Committees\WSP\2020\20200504\06\Item-6.docx