ITEM: |
PUBLIC
HEARINGS |
||||
|
|||||
9. |
CONSIDER APPLICATION TO
AMEND |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting
Date: |
September 22, 2008
|
Budgeted:
|
N/A
|
||
|
|||||
From: |
Darby Fuerst,
|
Program/ |
N/A |
||
|
General
Manager |
Line Item No.: N/A |
|||
|
|||||
Prepared
By: |
Henrietta
Stern |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: Yes
|
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A
|
|||||
CEQA Compliance: The MPWMD, as a Responsible Agency for this
project, will rely on environmental documents previously approved by the |
|||||
SUMMARY: The District Board will consider Application
#20071212CVR-L4 (Exhibit 9-A) from applicants California Am
When the 12-lot subdivision was approved in December 2006, the County action included re-designation of water that had been previously earmarked for 25 residential lots in Area F of the CVR Specific Plan in 1997; these lots had been previously approved for development, but were no longer planned to be developed. The County action also included rezoning of eleven existing legal residential lots of record in the Oakshire Subdivision area to open space. The Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA) confirmed in January 2008 that the County “continues to hold 8.807 acre-feet per year” (AFY) from its existing MPWMD allocation of CAW water for the 12-lot CVR subdivision (Exhibit 9-C). District records indicate there is roughly 12 AF remaining in the County’s CAW allocation.
The MPWMD serves as a Responsible Agency in this matter in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and relies on environmental documents, mitigation plan and certain conditions of approval adopted by the Monterey County BOS in December 2006. The County’s Mitigated Negative Declaration concluded that there would be no increase in water use by the 12-lot subdivision due to the rezoning of other parcels and re-designation of water allotments from undeveloped residential lots to the new 12 lots as described above. Also, the applicant has agreed to MPWMD WDS permit conditions and deed restrictions requiring monitoring, reporting and compliance with MPWMD enforcement actions to ensure the 8.807 AFY limit will not be exceeded for the 12 future lots when treated as a group. Please refer to the “Background” and “Discussion” sections below for more information.
Documentation to substantiate the approved county project and the existing WDS and proposed water allocation is incorporated herein by reference. All files associated with the application are available for review at the District office. Under separate cover, the District Board has been provided a copy of the relevant CEQA documents adopted by the County. Public notice of this hearing through a variety of means was provided in the manner required by the applicable District rules, as described below.
RECOMMENDATIONS: District staff recommends that the Board take the following actions:
1. Adopt the MPWMD Findings of Approval for Application #20071212CVR-L4 to Amend the CAW WDS (Exhibit 9-D) with specific reference to Finding #21, District compliance with CEQA as a Responsible Agency.
2. Approve Application #20071212CVR-L4; authorize issuance of MPWMD Permit #M08-02-L4 with the 27 Conditions of Approval specified in Exhibit 9-E. The Conditions of Approval include required conditions as specified in MPWMD Rule 22-D as well as special conditions for this project. They also reiterate five adopted County conditions related to water supply, conservation, and reporting.
3. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Monterey County Clerk in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15096(i).
BACKGROUND: The
CVR subdivision project has a lengthy history, including litigation. The original project (PLN 020280) was
approved by
MPWMD Application #20071212CVR-L4 was submitted on December 12, 2007 and
was found to be incomplete, as described in the letter from the District to the
applicant on January 11, 2008. In a
letter dated January 28, 2008, the applicant provided the requested information
about project maps, water availability from
DISCUSSION: Key application materials on file at the District office (hard copy or CD) include:
Ø MPWMD Application #20071212CVR-L4 to Amend CAW WDS dated December 12, 2007;
Ø Proposed annexation map;
Ø Monterey County Water Resources Agency letter dated January 30, 2008 regarding 8.807 AFY available for the proposed 12-lot subdivision at Carmel Valley Ranch;
Ø
Ø
Monterey County Notice of Determination for CVR
project filed with the
Ø Monterey County Resolution #06-366 approving the 12-lot subdivision on APN 416-522-020;
Ø County Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the 12-lot subdivision (PLN020280);
Ø
December
19, 2006
Ø
Approval of Application #20071212CVR-L4
The Findings of Approval (Exhibit 9-D) are based on evidence provided
in the application materials, including supporting documents on file at the
District office. Staff believes the
application meets the criteria and minimum standards for Approval set by
District Rules 22-B and C. Pertinent
information includes the approved County environmental document, technical
studies and reports, technical memoranda and maps, correspondence between MPWMD
staff and the applicant, and previous approvals by other governmental entities.
MPWMD approval of the application, as
conditioned, is not anticipated to result in a further effect to the
The Conditions of Approval (Exhibit 9-E) proposed for Permit #M08-02-L4 are
consistent with MPWMD Rule 22-D governing approval of water distribution
systems. Conditions #1-4 define the
Permitted System, including designation of up to 8.807 AFY of metered CAW sales
to serve the 12 future lots; the 8.807 AFY would be deducted from the
Conditions #5-23 reflect standard MPWMD mandatory conditions, including water quality, metering and annual reporting, conservation, required Indemnification Agreement, fee payments, timely notice of pending or actual changes to the system, and other required elements. Other Conditions of Approval (Conditions #24-25) address water rights and the Endangered Species Act; these are not required by District rules, but are included in all MPWMD WDS permits. It is notable that the SWRCB is in the process of finalizing a Cease and Desist Order against CAW, but it is unknown at this time what the final Order will require, and how the Order may affect the ability of CAW to serve lots that are not yet hooked up to the CAW system.
Special Condition #26 addresses the need to ensure that no more than 8.807 AFY is used on the 12 lots as a group, given the sensitivity of the CVAA and pending actions that affect it. The proposed District condition includes a deed restriction to be placed on each of the 12 future parcels advising owners of the water use restrictions, the additional monitoring and reporting of metered sales to MPWMD to ascertain that no more than 8.807 AFY is used; and the authority to enforce actions to reduce water use if more than 8.807 AFY is used in any one year. This condition also reiterates five County conditions relating to water supply. The applicant’s attorney in a letter dated January 28, 2008 (Exhibit 9-F), has agreed to such restrictions. The letter also notes that the December 2006 County conditions of approval already mandate a deed restriction requiring water-saving fixtures, drought tolerant landscaping and water efficient irrigation (County Conditions 33 and 34); water balance analysis of pre-and post-development water use (Condition 35); and proof of water availability by County and MPWMD staff (Condition 59).
Special Condition #27 requires that a copy of California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Confirmation of the annexation be provided to the District. Special Condition #28 mandates that the District be provided copies of all pertinent water monitoring reports associated with the 12 lots, and have physical access to each of the 12 lots for onsite inspections, if needed.
In an e-mail dated September 15, 2008, the applicant’s attorney expressed concerns about certain language in the standard Indemnification Agreement that is required as a condition of permit approval (Attachment 2 to Exhibit 9-E). Staff has asked the attorney to discuss the matter with District Counsel, and it is not known at this writing whether the concerns have been resolved.
The District Board action must
comply with CEQA as well as MPWMD regulations.
In the review of this application, MPWMD has followed those guidelines
adopted by the State of
The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) contains a detailed review of how water from previously approved, but undeveloped, projects within CVR is available for re-allocation to the 12-lot subdivision. The IS/MND concluded that development of the project will result in no net increase of water use, and is consistent with both MPWMD Ordinance No. 70 and County approval for water dated October 11, 1994. Therefore, there would not be an increase in water use as there is no addition to the total water use approved for the allowed development under the Carmel Valley Ranch Specific Plan. At the request of District staff, MCWRA re-confirmed that 8.807 AFY of water is designated for the CVR project in a letter dated January 30, 2008 (Exhibit 9-C).
Public notice has been provided
no later than 10 days prior to this public hearing in several ways, including:
(1) mailed notices to property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel; (2)
posted notices at the project site; (3) posted notice at the MPWMD office; (4)
notice of the public hearing to recipients of District agendas for the
September 22, 2008 meeting; (5) standard agenda/hearing notices to local media;
and (6) posting of the September 22, 2008 agenda and agenda materials on the
District website.
EXHIBITS
9-A Application #20071212CVR to amend the CAW WDS
(without attachments)
9–B Map of proposed CAW service area
9–C MCWRA letter dated January 30, 2008 confirming
available CAW water
9–D Findings of Approval for Application #20071212CVR
9–E Conditions of Approval for Application
#20071212CVR
9–F Letter from Tony Lombardo dated January
28, 2008 regarding permit conditions
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2008\2008boardpackets\20080922\PublicHrgs\09\item9.doc