ITEM: |
DISCUSSION ITEM |
||||
|
|||||
14. |
UPDATE ON WATER DEMAND BY
JURISDICTION |
||||
|
|||||
Meeting Date: |
November 13, 2023 |
Budgeted: |
No |
||
|
|||||
From: |
David J. Stoldt |
Program/ |
|
||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
Prepared By: |
David J. Stoldt |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
||
|
|||||
General Counsel Approval: N/A |
|||||
Committee Recommendation: N/A |
|||||
CEQA
Compliance: This action does not
constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines section 15378. |
|||||
SUMMARY: The District adopted a Supply and Demand forecast at its September
19, 2022 Board meeting. The forecast was based on the 25-year Association of
Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG) 2022 Regional Growth Forecast, a 25-year
model that informs the AMBAG Metropolitan Transportation Plan and is intended
to be consistent with the 6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs
Allocation (RHNA). The Adopted forecast showed an incremental need of 944
acre-feet (AF) of new supply to meet demand.
While the AMBAG documents purport
consistency between the 6th Cycle RHNA Plan 2023-2031, the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and the Regional Growth Forecast (see Exhibit
14-A highlighted sections), upon review
of the AMBAG documents District staff discovered some disconnect between RHNA
housing numbers and Regional Growth Forecast population numbers. Such
inconsistencies are shown below:
Jurisdiction |
6th Cycle RHNA Units Required (2023) by AMBAG |
25-Year Population Growth in
AMBAG MTP and Regional Growth Forecast 2020-2045 |
Carmel |
349 |
35 |
Del Rey Oaks |
184 |
988 |
Monterey |
3,654 |
1,469 |
Pacific Grove |
1,125 |
552 |
Sand City |
260 |
813 |
Seaside |
616 |
4,779 |
Further, the County while not yet
completing its 2023-2031 Draft Housing Element has preliminarily indicated
that it will attempt to locate as many as 1,966 housing units within the
Districts jurisdiction, almost 1,200 of which would be along the Route 68
corridor. Jurisdictions draft 2023-2031 Housing Elements consistent with the 6th
Cycle RHNA are due to be submitted to the State by December, however it is now
expected that the County will be late.
While the District typically relies
on population rather than housing (people use water, not houses) for its
adopted residential water demand forecast, water demand based on proposed
housing stock yields slightly different outcomes. Therefore, staff also
analyzed the proposed RHNA housing units by capacity for water use, mix of
stock per income class, water service provided outside the District and Cal-Am,
among other things, as shown in Exhibit 14-B.
It may be instructive to look at
other assumptions that might change based on the differences between the RHNA
target and the AMBAG Regional Growth Forecast population.[1] District
Staff presented preliminary analysis to the Water Demand Committee on October
2, 2023. Staff also made certain assumptions about non-residential water use as
a result of job growth. Two different residential water demand forecast
outcomes, added to the non-residential water demand forecast, will be discussed
at the November 13, 2023 Board meeting, and are shown in Exhibit 14-C.
To this forecast, the separate
needs of the Airport District and the Department of Defense installations must
be added. Additional information on those additions is presented in Agenda Item
15.
EXHIBITS
14-A Excerpts
of AMBAG Documents 2022 and 2023
14-B Summary
of Water Supply Requirements for Housing
14-C Water
Required for RHNA Units / Combined Water Demand Forecast
U:\staff\Boardpacket\2023\20231113\Discussion
Items\14\Item-14.docx
[1] Note: Jurisdictions that believe they will accomplish their housing buildout much earlier than the 25-year horizon of the AMBAG Regional Growth Forecast have not adequately answered the questions as to how that affects population growth forecasts, what happens to population after the housing is built, is there a mis-match between housing and people, etc?